TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
03.07.2008
Does Steve Schmidt Have Crazy Cojones?

Since it's the afternoon before a three-day weekend and no one seems inclined to call me back for the magazine story I'm working on, I guess I'll pass the time by indulging in some more semi-informed McCainland blogging. At the end of today's NYT article on the campaign shakeup, there's this interesting tidbit:

Mr. McCain spent Wednesday in Colombia, his second overseas trip in a week, and one that he took despite the urging of Republicans who said he needed to convey his concerns about domestic problems to voters at home.

“Somebody asked, ‘What’s the strategy behind this?’ ” [Charlie] Black said of the foreign travel. “It’s simple. McCain says he wants to go to these places, and we say, of course.”

I gather Black was joking, but I think there's more truth in what he said than he'd like to admit. When I did this McCainland story a few months ago, one of the biggest complaints from McCain supporters about the Davis/Black regime was that it was too deferential to McCain's wishes:

"My criticism of the current operation," says one McCainiac, "is that it's much more inclined to figure out what the senator wants and then organize that, as opposed to doing what's in his best interest to win." This McCainiac cites the use of Joe Lieberman, who often served as McCain's travel companion rather than as a surrogate: "McCain likes to have some people with him, but it didn't make sense to have Lieberman with him. You could have had twice the benefit if Lieberman went someplace else. But John didn't feel that way." Complains one Republican leader: "There's got to be someone or some people around with the kind of crazy cojones or attitude to tell the candidate no. Charlie's not going to do it because lobbyists by nature don't do that; they're in the making-friends business. And Mark [Salter] can only do it so much."

Schmidt was obviously a member of McCain's inner circle back when these complaints were being voiced, but I wonder if, in his new elevated position, he'll feel empowered enough to order McCain around rather than accommodate him. One potential sign: McCain's going to spend all of next week doing economy-related events; something tells me he would rather have spent that week down Mexico way.

--Jason Zengerle 

Posted: Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:24 PM with 2 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Rhubarbs said:

So John McCain would rather do what feels good personally than do what it takes to get the job done, and he surrounds himself with yes-men who are unwilling or unable to persuade him to act in the greater good when he just doesn't fee like it? Seems like that right there is all any rational person needs to know about why John McCain must not be elected president. I don't care if Good Old Joe is your pal and you enjoy hanging out with him; if you're the president, and sending Joe to Mongolia would serve your agenda, you damn well send him to Mongolia and you don't think twice about it and if that means he hates your guts and you've lost a friend, tough.

The presidency is too important for sentimentality or anything less than a ruthless devotion to accomplishment. Within the bounds of law and honor, it's a do-what-it-takes, get-the-job-done, kind of job. If McCain intends to govern like he campaigns -- and recent history shows that presidents do, in fact, run their administrations like they run their campaigns -- then he's just not up to the job.

July 3, 2008 3:17 PM

sbarr13 said:

Back in February, I heard Schmidt saying that he expected to compete in Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New York, and California if Obama became the nominee. He was absolutely certain that Hillary was the more difficult candidate. Now that Obama is crushing McCain in all of those states, according to Nate Silver, with double digits even in Pennsylvania, I gotta wonder about Schmidt's political instincts. I asked him about it at the same, and he INSISTED that McCain's maverick image could help open the map in the same way that Obama is doing. So maybe we should look for McCain to flip (or flop) back to the middle? Not that it will help him in New York and Connecticut, or ever would have,

July 3, 2008 10:04 PM