TNR BLOGS

August 29, 2008 | 4:54 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:44 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:42 PM

August 27, 2008 | 11:42 PM
August 27, 2008 | 6:45 PM
August 27, 2008 | 6:43 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

August 29, 2008 | 6:47 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:44 PM
August 28, 2008 | 6:37 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
03.07.2008
Does McCain Have One More Campaign Shakeup Left In Him?

Chait and Kaus both say there's still plenty of time for McCain Campaign 4.0 to be unveiled, with Mike Murphy running the show. I still say no way--McCain is going to sink or swim with Version 3.0 and Steve Schmidt, and yesterday's shakeup means Murphy (and John Weaver, for that matter) are going to remain on the sidelines for this one.

My reasoning is two-fold. First, I think Schmidt is going to be up to the challenge in front of him. Everyone rightly talks about his time in BushWorld, but I think the more relevant experience might be his stewardship of Arnold Schwarzenegger's 2006 reelection campaign. When Schmidt came on board, Schwarzenegger was in serious trouble, having just spent all of his political capital on four unsuccessful (and fairly conservative) ballot initiatives in 2005; his approval ratings were in the toilet. He'd been branded a conservative out of touch with California voters. But for the gubernatorial campaign, Schmidt steered Arnold to the center, which enabled the Governator to win over many of the same independents and Democrats who'd abandoned him a year earlier.

I realize there's a popular school of thought that Schmidt's elevation cements the notion that McCain is running for Bush's third term, but I think Schmidt's more likely to take the McCain campaign in the opposite direction. Under Schmidt, look for McCain to make forays onto issue terrain that typically favors Democrats--like, say, the environment--and try to compete with Obama for ownership of the change mantle. Combine Schmidt's strategic flexibility with a Rove-like tactical ruthlessness--Schmidt, a senior McCain adviser told me, was the brains behind McCain's accusation back before the Florida Primary that Romney favored "surrender" in Iraq, which may have stretched the truth but served the purpose of changing the subject from the economy to the war right when it seemed like Romney was getting traction out of the former--and, in Schmidt, I think McCain might have found a change he can believe in. None of this means I think McCain is going to win--because I don't--but I think Schmidt's the sort of campaign chief who'll give McCain his best chance of doing so.

The second reason I think this will be the final dramatic upheaval in McCainland is because, even if Schmidt tanks, I don't think McCain can afford to do any more major reshuffling without running the risk of key Republicans concluding that he's hopeless and abandoning him en masse, a la Bob Dole in 1996. "At some point, the question has to be, can McCain manage five or six people," one GOP leader complained to me after yesterday's shakeup. "That's what McCain has to show, that he can get his campaign running, because it says something about what kind of administration he'll run." Although there are still four months until November, I get the sense that people in McCainland knew this was their last shot to get things right. Plus, the fact that McCain turned to Schmidt instead of Murphy in his hour of need has to piss off Murphy, since he and Schmidt are cut from similar cloth and are said to have a pretty fierce rivalry; even if McCain wanted to bring Murphy on board at some future point, who's to say Murphy would be willing?

I love internal campaign drama as much as the next guy, and I think the McCain operation still has the potential to give us some good stuff. (How Schmidt handles his relationship with Rick Davis should be interesting; presumably he's learned a lesson from the last time Davis was pushed aside--the lesson being, as Mark Salter aptly put it, “It’s not like we can just put Rick in a corner and give him a fucking banana." ) But I think the juiciest episodes of "As McCainland Turns" are now behind us.

--Jason Zengerle

Posted: Thursday, July 03, 2008 12:17 PM with 9 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

teplukhin2you said:

Arnold and Bloomberg represent the future of the GOP-- sane, flexible, willing to expand government where necessary but fundamentally opposed to statism and identity-group pandering.

McCain's campaign will either accelerate this shift back to Your Father's GOP (Eisenhower, Rockefeller, Bill Milliken in MI, Sanforth in MO, Brooke and Javits in the NE), or represent the last gasp of the old fundie-zealot GOP. If he takes the Schwarzenegger route, he can beat Obama by a decent margin. For starters, he'd win CO and FL, probably OH and maybe even MI and MO.

July 3, 2008 12:34 PM

JSmith125 said:

If McCain could "take the Schwarzenegger route" he would have done it by now, right? Instead he's been doing the reverse, hardening his commitment to right-wing orthodoxy on most issues. Are we supposed to believe that's just because this Schmidt guy hasn't been running his campaign? And now they're just going to up and reverse course? Much more likely, it's because (a) McCain simply isn't as moderate / pragmatic / ideologically flexible as Schwarzenegger, and/or (b) the national Republican base and its various interest groups exert pressures on national GOP candidates that are totally unlike the pressures on a candidate for CA governor.

In fact I'd be amazed if even a Republican operative was stupid enough to think that you could run anything like a Schwarzenegger campaign nationally. At the time of his re-election, Scharzenegger was the incumbent, and in any case a famous movie star (which, for some reason, seems to be a political asset) who had come to office outside normal channels and without having to rely on his party's base at all. And he was running against Phil Angelides, not Barack Obama. But the main point is that CA and the nation as a whole are two quite different political landscapes. I'd love to think that "Arnold and Bloomberg [what, not "Mike"?] represent the future of the GOP," but I seriously doubt that's the case, and anyway it's a future that wouldn't come until the right's influence on the Republican Party is neutralized, which will only happen after they've been losing elections consistently for maybe 10 - 20 years.

July 3, 2008 1:04 PM

Barnacle said:

Well put, JSmith.

Schmidt wasn't the one who moved Arnold to the center. Susan Kennedy, a life-long Democrat, was hired as Arnold's chief of staff after the Nov. 2005 ballot initiative debacle. Arnold then moved to the left. He was indistinguishable from the liberal Democrats on several issues.

Schmidt ran the '06 campaign, but when your policies are all in line with what the Democrats offer, in an overwhelmingly Democratic state, all Schmidt had to do was prove that Arnold  was more interesting and able to lead than Phil Angelides. To do that, Arnold had to simply show up.

July 3, 2008 1:41 PM

JSmith125 said:

Thanks, Barnacle, I'd forgotten about Susan Kennedy. Yeah, clearly Arnold took steps that McCain just doesn't have available to him even if he wanted to copy the Schwarzenegger strategy, which I'm guessing he doesn't anyway. This new role for Schmidt might help McCain, but if so it won't be by Arnold-izing him.

July 3, 2008 3:12 PM

Wandreycer1 said:

Great posts JSmith - and you're right about Susan Kennedy Barnacle. She's amazing.

If McCain started sounding anything like Arnie, his already dwindling funds would dry up overnight.  Besides, Arnie's Caifornia platform and political world in general make Obama look like Attila the Hun.

There simply is no comparison between what Obama has to do to win this GE in a basically center-right country and what Arnie had to do to win re-election in a very liberal CA.  

McCain has to stay wed to the loser dinosaur wingers just to stay financially afloat.  Look for him to just go uglier, more personal, I don't see much else for him to work with - flip flopper just leaves him wide open to charges of hypocrisy. McCain staked his positons with his corporate/religio/gun nut paymasters just like every other Republican presidential candidate since Reagan has.  He represents change as much as black and white WWII flms.

Except for the slavering to the gun nuts, every policy position he's managed to come up with has been completely out of touch at best and assinine at best.  I deeply admire and even love John McCain and adore his wife, but his campaign has been uninspiring, incoherent and his basic politics even worse.  

July 3, 2008 3:44 PM

JSmith125 said:

"He represents change as much as black and white WWII flms." Yes, great line..... Although in fairness, I think "The Green Berets" was in color, wasn't it?

July 3, 2008 3:59 PM

Wandreycer1 said:

Fair enough JSmith, I *was* actually thinking more along the lines of the Duke - a perfect July 4th image, right?  John Wayne For Real Change.  

I am a hopeless Democrat and a big supporter of Obama's, but I love Johnnie Mac, warts and all. I want him to get his campaign together and scare me by coming closer than he has so far.  His constituency deserves it and so does he.  Honestly, I can't stand the idea of a US military man who was tortured for five years, who never cracked and who was an inspiration to a generation - losing 49 states while running for President.  There is something too awful about that.

I'm not counting my chickens, to do so tempts the Gods, but it just feels landslidey out there to me.

July 3, 2008 4:34 PM

The Plank said:

Will Mike Murphy be brought onto the McCain campaign in a major role? Jason doubts it . Bill Kristol

July 7, 2008 1:34 PM

The Plank said:

After betting --and then doubling down --that Mike Murphy would not be joining the McCain campaign, I

July 8, 2008 10:42 AM