TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
25.06.2008
Hillary's Choose Your Own Debtventure!

After 17 months of directing Operation Hillary, the would-be commander-in-chief is confronting some serious debt. $22.5 million of it. According to a report by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) released Friday, Clinton owes $10.3 million to everyone from printers in Iowa to caterers in Pennsylvania to Mark Penn's consulting firm in D.C. She's also down the $12.2 million she personally loaned her campaign.

As Clinton heads into a meeting today with Obama--at which her finances are assumed to be a topic of conversation--we decided to give her a hand and map out three options she has for settling her debt:

 



Clinton is not the only candidate this year to run into the red. Rudy Giuliani's website is actively soliciting donations to retire his campaign's still-stinging primary debts, and Giuliani teamed with McCain in a version of Debtventure No. 3 when, earlier this year, the McCain campaign promised to help Giuliani retire his debt (though these efforts have been a bit neglected, as McCain has had his mind on other things). In an infamous variation on Debtventure No. 2, beloved spaceman-cum-senator John Glenn retained a nearly $3 million debt from his 1984 presidential run until just two years ago, when the FEC let it slide. But since that option would prevent Clinton from running for future office, it's unlikely she will go that route.  

Clinton's likely course of action may be a combination of Debtventures Nos. 1 and 3: Convince her donors to reclassify their loans for her Senate campaign so that she can collect funds from her own supporters, while also gathering contributions from Obama donors. She has already sent a video to supporters asking for their continued backing. And if today's meeting goes well, she may also have Obama's support (as indicated in a Tuesday phone call during which he asked his top donors to help Clinton retire her debt). 

Happily, however financially dire things may seem for "Hillary Clinton: The Campaign," "Hillary Clinton: The Multimillion-Dollar Joint Bank Account" should more than cushion the blow in approximately 6.8 speaking engagements

--Nicole Allan and Bess Kalb

Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 8:17 PM with 11 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

aeromonas said:

Uh, how does Obama "sidestep" the law prohibiting his campaign from just writing Clinton a check?

And if you can answer this one for me, my next question is how can I sidestep the law prohibiting me from robbing a Brink's truck?  

I'd be happy to use a dummy pistol so there's no chance of anyone actually getting hurt.  

June 25, 2008 11:48 PM

apfrankel said:

Is there an option #4, where Hillary pays off the debt out of pocket?

June 26, 2008 12:30 AM

psantillana said:

apfrankel, isn't that the execution of option 2? Although I don't understand "they deem feasible".

aero, I don't think "sidestep" means break the law, just get kind of the same result. But not really, because it banks on the kind hearts of Obama donors to Clinton, and I don't see why we should do this. He never asked me to write checks to Chris Dodd, whom I liked much better. Why her? Because she's special? Because I'm chivalrous? Becuase she's 22.5 whole million worth of irresponsible? Why did he not ask me to help out Bear Stearns a while ago?

June 26, 2008 1:16 AM

apfrankel said:

I don't *think* it's option #2.  Paying off your debts out of pocket seems like it's the same thing as self-financing.  And I don't think self-financing candidates become ineligible for reelection!  But I'm not a lawyer and I have no special knowledge of election laws, so this is just a guess on my part.

June 26, 2008 1:53 AM

jcantwell said:

Recall Clinton's own words: "I am in it to win it".  She did not win it.  The $22.5 million debt should be her problem.

If the lemmings who followed her off the cliff are stupid enough to say "yeah, we really intended this donation to get her re-elected as Senator from the great state of New York in 2012 because we know it will take at least $22.5 million to make sure she sails (once again) into that role virtually unchallenged", well God love them, the rules allow them to do so.

My guess is not enough of them will convert the donations according to the rules nor will enough of Obama's supporters choose to donate even more money in his name to her.  Clinton will be left with the mundane and unfamiliar task of actually working to pay off the balance of her debts.

Oh wait, that's where Bill comes in...100 speeches to special interest groups and that debt is erased!

If only the Clintons could find the next Raffaello Follieri now - wouldn't that be great!

June 26, 2008 2:17 AM

nancy mcaleavey said:

Perhaps you should be monitoring this election cycle much more carefully.  Yesterday I received an email from the Clinton campaign saying this:

"As you know, I had to loan money to my campaign at critical moments. I'm not asking for anyone's help to pay that back. That was my investment and my commitment because I believe so deeply in our cause."

So you should be excluding her personal loans ($11 million, IIRC) from her debt.

June 26, 2008 10:20 AM

Rhubarbs said:

This is what Hillary's campaign emailed me yesterday, with the subject line, "Keeping My Promise."

" I made a promise to you, and I intend to keep it. I told you that if you stood up for me, I would always stand up for you. You did more for me than I could have ever imagined, and I'm going to keep my end of the bargain and keep fighting for what we believe in ..."

Which is to say, "Don't cry for me, dear supporters / The truth is, I never left you / All through my campaign / My hopeless spending / I kept my promise / Don't stop your giving."

June 26, 2008 11:55 AM

psantillana said:

apfrankel, I'm just guessing too, but I think that she becomes ineligible if there's debt left over. If she self financed the whole thing instead of what I guess is the equivalent of a campaign declaring bankruptcy, then she'd be ok.

What I want to know is - could unpaid vendors sue her personally? If the campaign were a corporation, this would be "piercing the veil" and only possible if a breach of duty or care were involved. And that campaign seems to have run its finances with the care of a compulsive gambler.

June 26, 2008 5:24 PM

aint2sure said:

It's easy, Hillary! Just loan yourself more money and pay off those bills!

June 27, 2008 12:39 AM

check said:

clinton says she still has a lot of power and wants all sorts of favors at the convention.  read the wall st journal today.  she says that she has this power because she won all those states in the latter part of the race.  ok.  that is also when she racked up the big bills.  and if she had won, then it would have been ok.  well, she didnt win  so why is she being treated so well by the party now.  she ran up the tab, she lost,  show her the door.  write her a check if you must, but show this incompetent the door at the convention.. thats whats getting me mad.  so much of the money also went to  her clothes, her makeup people and such.  obama tried to say as much once about male vs. female expenditures on that image, but all he had to do is keep his shirts clean.. she is a spending machine and let her pals pay for this.  will we ever see the end of this clinton nightmare?

July 8, 2008 3:53 PM

The Plank said:

A few weeks ago, TNR mapped out several ways Hillary Clinton could haul herself out of her $22.5 million

July 16, 2008 3:07 PM