TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.06.2008
Who Cares?

National polls mean little at this point, but let’s look at the latest Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll.  It shows Barack Obama with a 15 percentage point lead over John McCain among 1115 registered voters. That could be taken as a sign of partisan preference rather than of specific support for Obama, but one question jumps off the page. In gauging a candidate’s appeal, I always look at the “cares more about people like you” question. It is what George W. Bush did well on even when people disagreed with his policies, and what the past two Democrat nominees did relatively poorly on. What about Barack Obama against John McCain? You’d think that Obama would be hampered on this question by racial differences, as he appeared to be during the Democratic primaries, but when the poll asked, “Regardless of your choice for president, who do you think cares more about people like you?" Obama bested McCain by 50 to 23 percent--among males by 42 to 27 percent and females by 56 to 20 percent. That says a lot to me about John McCain’s difficulties as a presidential candidate and does say something about Obama’s prospects in the fall, in spite of the fact it is only June.

--John B. Judis

Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:04 PM with 4 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

emh77 said:

If this keeps up, who will look sillier? John Judis, author of "The Next McGovern"? Or Shelby Steel, he of "A Bound Man: Why we are excited about Obama and why he can't win"?

June 24, 2008 11:32 PM

anonevent said:

emh77, I do think polls like this spoil Judis's "I told you you should have voted for Hillary" narrative.  That's why you get the line "[t]hat could be taken as a sign of partisan preference rather than of specific support for Obama."  It wasn't really Obama who won, but people just really didn't like McCain.

June 25, 2008 9:51 AM

JRBehrman said:

This is especially interesting in relation to the much lower and less differentiated party ID polling.

June 25, 2008 9:57 AM

Daily Intelligencer - New York Magazine said:

One poll, that’s nothing, don't waste our time with that garbage. But two polls — that’s a horse of a completely different color.

June 25, 2008 12:11 PM