TNR BLOGS

August 29, 2008 | 4:54 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:44 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:42 PM

August 27, 2008 | 11:42 PM
August 27, 2008 | 6:45 PM
August 27, 2008 | 6:43 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

August 29, 2008 | 6:47 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:44 PM
August 28, 2008 | 6:37 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
18.06.2008
The Crappening

After reading Chris's hilariously genius "review" of The Happening and his subsequent blog post, there is really no excuse for what I did last night. In what can only be described as an act of self-masochism, I paid to see M. Night Shyamalan's debacle of a film. But take heart: Fans of "Mystery Science Theater 3000" should love this movie; it is so eminently make-fun-of-able, it's irresistible. It definitely works as a comedy. I laughed the whole way home just thinking about the tiger arm-eating scene and the weird, dischordant, faux incredulous tone of Mark Wahlberg (he says, "Oh no, that is awful" and manages to sound like Amy Adams in Enchanted).

Also several people, including Chris, told me that supposedly Shyamalan did have a cameo in the film but they couldn't remember it. I found this strange as his cameos always annoy me: Just when I am in the grip of the plot, totally submerged in the story, in walks Shyamalan, forcing me to think, Oh, there's the egoist who made this movie, utterly disengaging me from any good mojo the film had over me. So, as the last scenes were unfolding last night, I realized that I too had not yet seen Shyamalan. Was it possible that I had become so engrossed in this catastrophe of good sense that I missed him in a crowd scene somehow? So, ever the glutton for punishment, I stayed for the credits. And there it was: M. Night Shyamalan is listed as "Joey"--also known as Alma's (Zoe Deschanel) sort-of adulterous tiramisu partner, a character who is discussed but never seen on film at all. (The closest we get to meeting Joey is Alma's side of a cell phone conversation that goes something like, "We had tirmisu and that's all we are ever going to have!") How nauseatingly meta. It's time to take Shyamalan out back and kick the shit out of him.

 At least one other film-goer last night agreed. As I left, I saw a living version of comic-book guy from "The Simpsons" on a cell phone declaring, "I... am... in... awe... of how AWFUL that movie was." Here, here, comic-book guy, here, here.

--Sacha Zimmerman 

Posted: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 2:27 PM with 10 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

epicciuto said:

I have yet to see this movie, although my curiosity is piqued. But in all the hoopla over how bad this movie is, I'm concerned other bad movies might get forgotten. I just want to give a shout-out to my favorite terrible movie to watch in jaw-dropping awe, i.e., The Island of Dr. Morreau. And of course, my favorite person to snark on it with, drdannnyu!

June 18, 2008 2:54 PM

nolo93 said:

I am in awe of the bodacious critical bashing that movie has inspired.

June 18, 2008 3:19 PM

lymon1 said:

thisflicksucks.blogspot.com  (I thought the same thing).

June 18, 2008 4:09 PM

jhildner said:

I think the expression is "hear, hear!" as in "Listen to this guy!"

June 18, 2008 4:42 PM

tnr1.com said:

Hahaha!! I'm an idiot. here, here, Sacha

June 18, 2008 4:55 PM

ljviolanti said:

I have to admit the bad reviews really have me interested - in a "you don't want to be the only kid on the block who DOESN'T know how bad The Happening is" way.    And Chris and Sacha are making it sound entertainingly bad.  

The question for me is: can it possibly be worse than "Battlefield Earth"?  That's my personal gold standard for delusionally bad big budget filmmaking.  I think I need to find out.  

June 18, 2008 5:52 PM

drdannyu said:

For the record, epic, I would consider seeing this film, but only with you.

June 18, 2008 5:52 PM

aeromonas said:

No, the gold standard for delusionally bad big budget film making has to be "Waterworld."  That flick pulled off the magic trick of being the most expensive film of its day and yet looking for all the world like a low-budget knockoff of "Road Warrior."  

It also managed to deep six Kevin Costner's career, which despite his admittedly limited talents, was a net loss to Hollywood.  Costner had--past tense only because these days the only material they give him is complete drek--a kind of wry, old-school leading man appeal, sort of like a square, somewhat less intelligent George Clooney.  Hollywood needs handsome men who can deliver a joke and carry a film.  Besides Clooney who is there?

Denzel Washington?  Yes, but he's on the verge of being too old.

Leo Di Caprio?  Maybe.  He was good--very good actually--in "Blood Diamond" but he still looks like a kid to me.

Ben Affleck?  Please.  There's a reason we haven't seen much of him of late: he can't act.  

Matt Damon? Same problem as Leo.  He has the acting chops, but he looks like he's playing hookie from his Catholic boys' school.

Russell Crowe?  He's more of a character actor, really, both by appearance and by temperament.  

Tom Cruise?  You're joking, right?

June 19, 2008 8:19 AM

aeromonas said:

Can anyone tell I'm bored with electoral politics?  In the past day I've posted on leading men, the solar distillation of sea water, and pit barbecue.

June 19, 2008 8:22 AM

jobeek2 said:

Please please please: "Hear, hear!", not "Here, here"!

Thank you.

June 19, 2008 9:33 AM