TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
12.06.2008
Can Sunshine Help Obama Fight the Slime?

The fabulous Karen Tumulty has a piece up over at Time.com today (sorry, for some reason can't get our blog's link function to work; go to Time.com's home page and you'll see it) about Obama's rumor-fighting initiative, a web site called fightthesmears.com that seeks to confront head on all those nasty flasehoods being whispered--and emailed--about him and his family. In addition to debunking the more pernicious tales, the site asks Obama supporters to, with a click of a button, "Spread the Word" about the truth (or, rather, the lack thereof) behind such rumors.  

It's a risky proposition, creating a laundry list of lies and exagerations that many voters may not have yet heard. But I think it's a shrewd one. The crazies, nasties (think Roger Stone) and conspiracy theorists will only get crazier, nastier and more conspiracy-minded as this race goes on, and Obama can't risk ignoring their blatherings--no matter how unbalanced the charges seem or how many times the campagin has pointedly refuted them. (For the last time, the man is not a Muslim and he is more than happy to recite the pledge of allegiance--hand over heart--for anyone who feels compelled to test his patriotism.)

Obama's success will hinge in large part on his ability to soothe the gut-level, often subconscious fears of people who are skittish about him because they're not quite sure if he's "one of us." To do this, he will have to be more aggressive than your average white-bread candidate with a boring white-bread name like John McCain. Better still, enlisting Obama's online groundtroops in the effort seems in keeping with the grassroots, participatory nature of his campaign.

Fingers crossed. God knows someone needs to find a better way to clean up the process. 

--Michelle Cottle

Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:11 PM with 12 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

ratnerstar said:

Hmmmm ... well, it will probably be marginally helpful.  But this sort of strategy assumes a reasoning process that goes like this:

a) Obama is a Muslim (or whatever)

b) Muslims are bad

therefore

c) Obama is bad

I highly doubt that's the thought process that animates the consumers of this junk.  It's more like:

a) Obama is bad

b) Bad people do lots of bad things

therefore

c) I am prepared to believe any bad thing someone says about Obama

Addressing these rumors might change the minds of the roughly seven people who are fair minded about the candidates and also willing to entertain email rumors.  I guess elections have been decided on less....

June 12, 2008 10:36 AM

dbhuff said:

Fightthesmears.com doesn't seem to reflect right yet...but this works

my.barackobama.com/.../fightthesmearshome

June 12, 2008 10:37 AM

dbhuff said:

rat,  but there is a herd metality to people, and if a bunch of their friends start spreading the smear, they will too. But lobbing a link like this into the mob can salvage several folks before they become inculcated.

June 12, 2008 10:39 AM

newdex said:

I think the true value of a site like this would be in providing Obama supporters with the detailed facts to dispute the smears and rumors when they encounter them.  For example, if you find yourself among a crowd of in-laws talking about Obama's secret Islamic faith or whatever, just insisting "its not true!" would be less effective then being able to say, "actually that's a lie which has been spread around by X,Y and Z, even though its plainly disproved by Facts A, B and C."

June 12, 2008 11:48 AM

GSpinks said:

My concern, unfortunately, is whether or not these rumors are simply "Swiftboating '08", or something more nefarious and hateful.

Either way, it is encouraging to see that Obama is not going to be unwittingly sunk by it.

June 12, 2008 12:29 PM

tnmats said:

I found that no matter how much to try to convince someone that Barack Obama isn't (fill in the blank), it won't work with many.  Case in point:  my brother, a certified winger idiot, sent me one of those chain e-mails that have all kinds of made-up quotes that are supposd to be from Obama's books.  The "quotes" were so outrageous it was obvious they were lies.

When I sent him links to web pages like factcheck.org or snopes.com that refute the e-mail as a smear chain letter, his moronic retort was "prove those web sites aren't lying".  Idiots like him are hopeless, and I expect most dolts that fall for the lies will be.

I hope that just enough can be convinced but every day I just get more convinced the American public is dominated by idiots and dolts.  Newdex I've tried your way, using logic and reason with facts,  but I've never had it work.  Anyone who falls for such lies doesn't accept any reason.

June 12, 2008 12:32 PM

ackyri said:

Speaking of swiftboating, ask John Kerry what happens when you refuse to dignify petty attacks with a response.

Big tip of the hat to Senator Obama for having the drive to meet these lies head on and forcefully refute them.

June 12, 2008 12:41 PM

cspencef said:

Still, tnmats, there is some value in having the diehard liars and lie-believers exposed for what they are, even if it only wards off a few more naive readers from swallowing the lies.  And perhaps there is value even in the appearance of fighting the smears, compared to the passivity with which Kerry responded.

June 12, 2008 1:00 PM

tnmats said:

Cspencef I hope you're right.  I just hear too many smears that are so outrageous and ridiculous.  Maybe it's just the location or some people I'm exposed to.

Take the Muslim thing; BO goes to a church for 20 or so years, baptizes his kids in that church, and he's still considered a Muslim by many just due to his name??  If that's just doesn't tell you the mentality of many in this country I don't know what does.  'facts, I don't need no stinkin' facts' seems to be the American way.  Exposing the liars never seems to work if it's right wing lies.  How else do you explain how Mcbush gets away with his lies?

June 12, 2008 1:59 PM

liberal reformer said:

There is a fabulous piece on Roger Stone by Jeffrey Toobin in the June 9 and 16 issue of The New Yorker.  I have known of Stone for close to a third of a century, back to when he was a young man. He truly is a nasty piece of work. Google The New Yorker and scroll down - you will find the article.

June 12, 2008 3:29 PM

cspencef said:

tnmats, I have no illusions that there are waaaay too many of the truly idiotic, doltish, and flat-out evil to think the rumors will ever go away completely (and yeah, I've got family like that too, who could call Obama a Muslim out of one side of their mouths and harp on his crazy Christian pastor out of the other).  I'd rather see the Obama camp go hard after the rumors and stomp them flat than throw up their hands in despair...

June 12, 2008 5:34 PM

tnmats said:

Cspencef, agreed.  I hope they can dispell the rumors.  And glad to see I'm not the only one with stupid relatives.  I have to wonder how some people could have finished college but are still so ignorant (referring to my brother).

On second thought, we are being 'led' by a supposed Yale graduate.  So much for an Ivy League education.

June 12, 2008 10:12 PM