TNR BLOGS

September 06, 2008 | 3:43 PM
September 05, 2008 | 8:32 PM
September 05, 2008 | 8:16 PM

September 05, 2008 | 2:53 PM
September 05, 2008 | 3:45 AM
September 05, 2008 | 12:25 AM

September 06, 2008 | 3:14 PM
September 06, 2008 | 3:10 PM
September 05, 2008 | 4:28 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

September 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
September 03, 2008 | 1:01 PM
September 02, 2008 | 6:20 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
21.05.2008
Obama's Victory Lap

After these many Tuesdays, victory speeches turn into a blur. But tonight’s effort from Obama was pretty deftly crafted. A couple of new—at least to me—rhetorical moves. There were the plays for Hillary’s voters: in addition to the obvious brown-nosing, he mentioned Seneca Falls in his climatic narration of social movements through history. He also began to turn towards November by invoking “sportsmen” and “churchgoers.” These were done in passing—and when he talked about churchgoers, he didn’t muddy his play for Christians by mentioning shul and mosque-goers. It was the casual way that he dropped these references that is politically promising. I liked that he returned to his patriotism themes tonight in a more substantial way. The language of American Exceptionalism should coarse through his every speech, a wholesale theft of Reaganesque language, and he had lots of “last best hope” and “only in America” lines tonight.

The stagecraft of Obama speeches always garners a lot of attention—those annoying Abercrombie guys, dudes on cell phones etc. I thought the Iowa optics were better—a backdrop of people that didn’t seem designed to exacerbate the anxieties of Obama-skeptics. It’s not high-minded stuff, but it matters.

--Franklin Foer

Posted: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 4:52 AM with 16 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

jemerk said:

course I think - not good for an editor

May 21, 2008 12:44 AM

liberal reformer said:

I find American Exceptionalism tiring but this is sound advice Franklin. This sort of thing does matter and I imagine Obama and company, e.g., the Davids, Axelrod and Plouffe, will play close attention to such symbolism and substance.

May 21, 2008 12:44 AM

WoodyBombay said:

Indeed, I certainly hope he kisses enough Hillary supporter ass so that they actually vote their best interests - and what's best for this country - in November instead of staying home or voting or McCain.

After all, sensible health care, or sound economic sense, or getting out of the Iraq quagmire - none of that  matters. What's important is pressing those hot buttons Appalachia loves so much, and doing whatever it takes to keep some young douchebag from wrangling himself to a spot behind Obama in a speech that would be broadcast on TV. Because *that's* what matters: what guys do when they're standing behind Obama when he gives a speech.

Because, at the end of the day, American voters are fucking morons. The sooner the Obama campaign realizes this, the better. I just hope and pray they dumb themselves down fast enough.

May 21, 2008 1:17 AM

rozenson said:

Frank, I know that your family is very involved in shul life, so as a fellow observant Jew, let me say this: it's nice to be catered to in a primary, but you're right -- as far as Barack Obama is concerned now, America is composed completely of Christians.

May 21, 2008 1:23 AM

sephirothic77 said:

it wasn't much of a victory lap.  but it was a great speech, and as you point out we saw a continuation of the gradual process of obama turning toward the themes of the general.  and we still like what we see.  he seems to have ceded appalachia to her, which makes sense becasue he's not even running against her.  maybe it's all part of the master plan to court her voters by encouraging them to vote for her...  but can he lose the popular vote (a kentucky margin in puerto rico could make this very real) without tainting his win?  

May 21, 2008 1:42 AM

GSpinks said:

"he didn’t muddy his play for Christians by mentioning shul and mosque-goers"

An interesting thought; I wonder if this is an outright play for christians, or an attempt to appear more authentically christian to those who have doubts about his "real" religion?

"American voters are fucking morons"

Just the ones who voted W. in '00 and '04, as well as those who stayed home instead of voting Democrat.

May 21, 2008 1:45 AM

woland said:

You got it right WoodyBombay.  Obama better start dumbing down fast if he wants to win.  

"You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know... morons."

---Blazing Saddles

May 21, 2008 1:51 AM

lymon1 said:

It was a very good speech that few heard -- even Fox wasn't going whole-hog last night in its coverage (though watching Laura Ingrahm bully a college girl about Phyllis Schlaffley is always a treat).  Better than the shout-outs to blue collar voters was the substantive add-ons to his "change" lines.

I still think Obama will make a mistake if he abandons Puerto Rico -- a KY size loss won't risk his nominatoin, but it would give Hillary a valid total vote argument (i.e., without Michigan) and he doesn't need the pressure to make Hillary Clinton veep or to hear sniping through the campaign that the superdelagates stole the election from her.  I have no idea what their politics is like, what turnout would be, if there's a Latino "Bradley Effect" in their polls, etc.  

May 21, 2008 6:15 AM

hotshot22 said:

Off topic, anyone noticed that the Ads By Google section on tnr.com seems to mostly have links to anti-Obama sites?

May 21, 2008 7:43 AM

Wandreycer1 said:

I agree lymon (except with the "valid" popular vote thing for Hillary, an oxymoron).

Obama is not abandoning PR. I have a friend there right now volunteering (they aren't having a good time or anything like that, I promise...).  The campaign started setting up shop months ago - but so many people have very little idea of who Obama even is, even Hillary is not exactly known, just  Our Bill.  Name recognition is a killer.  But they are making progress,

May 21, 2008 7:52 AM

WaltB said:

I've got to disagree with how dumb American voters are.  Problem is more with how the media insists on sound bites instead of whole sentences. Look at the content of the moderated debates - that wasn't what voters really wanted to hear, it was what the media clowns felt was important and sensational.  

Obama has consistently given well crafted speeches with good content.  Clinton's have been more along the line of pandering and fear mongering.  I'd personally like him to continue as he has and not fall into the politics as usual trap.

May 21, 2008 9:14 AM

roidubouloi said:

Slightly off topic, but the NY Times, in its restrained style, made the point today that I have been pushing for some time, that Hillary's motivation for continuing her race to nowhere is ego and the desire not to lose the spotlight.  The Times said this:

"The darkening stage on Tuesday may be one reason that Mrs. Clinton continues so fiercely fighting to stay in the race. The alternative to victory isn’t just defeat, it’s a cloak of invisibility."

If the Times is willing to say it out loud, it must surely be on the minds of many people.

May 21, 2008 9:36 AM

Gavriel Meir-Levi said:

For me the high point was him invoking Hillary's candidacy as a role model for his daughters.  

I too was ok with there being no mention of Synagogues and such.  Obviously if he had been celebrating a primary win in NJ or Florida that may have been appropriate, but not here.  Not now.

May 21, 2008 12:41 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Very high-minded thread. Nice.

May 21, 2008 1:27 PM

jblum8156 said:

Yes, Hotshot, I have noticed those anti-Obama ads. I haven't opened any of them for fear they might poison my thoughts.

May 21, 2008 2:04 PM

mjmckay said:

jblum - open those ads, take their money and give it to the Google Guys and TNR

May 21, 2008 8:10 PM