TNR BLOGS

May 11, 2008 | 7:21 PM
May 11, 2008 | 1:47 PM
May 11, 2008 | 12:39 AM

May 09, 2008 | 2:11 PM
May 09, 2008 | 1:07 PM
May 08, 2008 | 5:01 PM

May 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
May 02, 2008 | 5:26 PM
May 02, 2008 | 2:40 PM

May 10, 2008 | 1:40 PM
May 09, 2008 | 6:40 PM
May 09, 2008 | 2:53 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
08.05.2008
Bush's Gift to McCain

The Federal Election Commission, you will recall, is currently unable to function because four of its six seats are vacant, thanks to a long-standing nomination dispute between the Bush administration and Senate Democrats. In what looked like a surprisingly conciliatory gesture, Bush agreed to send up a new slate of nominees. On closer inspection, though, what he's really done is send a big favor John McCain's way.

Democratic election-law guru Bob Bauer explains why this is the case. The primary objection Democrats had to Bush's old slate was that it included Hans von Spakovsky, a former Bush Justice Department official who turned the department's Civil Rights Division into a de facto arm of the RNC. Bush, displaying his characteristically sharp logic, attempted to resolve the situation by sending up a new slate of nominees that...still includes von Spakovsky. On the plus side, Republicans now appear willing to let the Senate vote separately on von Spakovsky (previously, Mitch McConnell had insisted all the nominees be voted on together), so Democrats will have a fair chance to vote down his nomination.

But here's what the GOP gets in return: Bush has dropped the re-nomination of Republican commissioner David Mason. It was Mason who had raised objections to McCain's sketchy, possibly illegal plan to opt out of public financing for the primaries despite initially accepting it and (sort of) using the public money to secure a bank loan to fund his campaign. Taking Mason out of the picture removes a major headache for McCain and lets him evade responsibility for the campaign's questionable financial maneuvering. It also clears his path to accept public financing for the general election, which requires a functioning FEC to approve. This likely explains why Bush is acting now--as Bauer points out, making sure the FEC can do its job is not normally a Republican priority.

Of course, the presumptive Democratic nominee has his own campaign finance conundrum, but I wouldn't be surprised if Obama ends up using McCain's flip-flopping here as an excuse for weaseling out of his own (now inconvenient) pledge to accept public financing for the fall campaign.

--Josh Patashnik 

Posted: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:54 PM with 5 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

GSpinks said:

Obama is going to eat McCain alive on this issue alone; a campaign finance scandal on the Straight Talk Express would absolutely derail McCain's draw on moderates and swing voters.

If this plays out, and Obama plays his cards right (not nasty but no pass on the financial malfeasance), he could derail the train, land-slide in the fall with better than 60% of the vote.

May 8, 2008 4:10 PM

ejbenjamin said:

Republicans are still running the show in the Senate.  Pathetic.

May 8, 2008 4:19 PM

liberal reformer said:

GSpinks: At this juncture is extremely premature to "know" what is going to happen on this issue. People were all breathless about the Vicky Iseman mini - scandal and now that has gone the way of the Edsel. Say, can you tell my how the 2012 presidential campaign is going to go down? Like you know, the candidates at the outset and the two who survive the culling and also, who will win, please?

May 8, 2008 4:21 PM

ratnerstar said:

Bush's gift to Obama: the Bush administration.

May 8, 2008 4:25 PM

GSpinks said:

Thanks lib ref. I left the conditionality unspoken because I figured that it goes without saying that if there is no legitimate issue then Obama won't touch it (like McCain's country of origin that someone was trying to make a deal over).

I will confess to being breathless over this one, but I'm not going to push the issue if its not obviously an issue.

2012? There are too many variables to take into account at this point. I will predict that if Obama loses, he'll be Gov of IL, and won't run because he is busy raising his family.

May 8, 2008 7:48 PM