TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
05.05.2008
They Should Know...

 The Weekly Standard on Hillary Clinton:

She's running a right-wing campaign. She's running the classic Republican race against her opponent, running on toughness and use-of-force issues, the campaign that the elder George Bush ran against Michael Dukakis, that the younger George Bush waged in 2000 and then again against John Kerry, and that Ronald Reagan--"The Bear in the Forest"--ran against Jimmy Carter and Walter F. Mondale. And she's doing it with much the same symbols...

Her ads are like the ones McCain would be running in her place, and they'll doubtless show up in McCain's ads should Obama defeat her. She has said that while she and McCain are both prepared to be president, Obama is not. They act, he makes speeches. They take heat, while he tends to wilt or to faint in the kitchen. He may even throw like a girl.

And better--or worse--she is becoming a social conservative, a feminist form of George Bush. Against an opponent who shops for arugula, hangs out with ex-Weathermen, and says rural residents cling to guns and to God in unenlightened despair at their circumstances, she has rushed to the defense of religion and firearms, while knocking back shots of Crown Royal and beer. Her harsh, football-playing Republican father (the villain of the piece, against whom she rebelled in earlier takes on her story) has become a role model, a working class hero, whose name she evokes with great reverence. Any day now, she'll start talking Texan, and cutting the brush out in Chappaqua or at her posh mansion on Embassy Row.

Read the whole thing (which prominently features our own Jon Chait as liberal foil) here.

--Christopher Orr

Posted: Monday, May 05, 2008 10:30 AM with 15 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

blackton said:

This marriage of convenience between the VRWC and Hillary is without doubt one of the most bizarre political happenings of my life. Hillary is a fighter, for who exactly (besides herself) I no longer have any idea.

On one hand this is so strangely entertaining I kind of hope she somehow does secure the nomination after a bloody convention battle, I am truly curious to see what new directions it can take, and the divorce between her and the VRWC will be truly wondrous to behold. Being that I think the next 4 years will be pretty bad no matter who is President I am starting to think this freakshow is far too entertaining to cancel.

Go Hillary Go.

May 5, 2008 10:59 AM

aduncanson said:

I have been wondering if Senator Clinton thought about the upcoming Kentucky primary or the importance of winning Tennessee in the general election when she ordered that notorious drink in that Indiana bar.  I wonder also if it crossed her mind that "Crown Royal" was  a pretty unlikely name for an American whiskey.  

Maybe it was just her wink to the Canadians, signaling that her anti-NAFTA talk need not distress then terribly much either.

May 5, 2008 11:08 AM

liberal reformer said:

Readers, this quote from The Weekly Standard is posted on the website of a magazine that in 2004 endorsed Joe Lieberman for president. There is some truth here but turn away from the security issues for a moment and see what remains. The Standard would not be saying that Hillary is running to the right on health care (her plan is actually more progressive than Obama's) or on trade(yes, her NAFTA - bashing is opportunistic), or on matters concerning chicanery in the financial markets, or on how to deal with home forclosures.

May 5, 2008 11:16 AM

virginiacentrist said:

I guess this is probably too obvious to post, but what the heck: If the right thought Hillary had a chance in hell at winning the Presidency, they'd go nuts.

For now, she's a thorn in the side of the likely nominee, which makes her worth rooting for.

May 5, 2008 11:20 AM

Rhubarbs said:

But why would even a tactically minded Weekly Standard post regard the drinking of Crown Royal as a sign of macho "social conservatism"? It's watery Canadian whiskey, for crying out loud. Bourbon, Tennessee whiskey, or possibly single-malt Scotch, sure, but Crown Royal? What kind of girly-man admires the drinking of second-rate Canadian hooch?

May 5, 2008 11:31 AM

WaltB said:

Great point about the Crown Royal.  If she'd really been trying to score points it would have been cheap bourbon, or at most Jack.  It just points out that neither side of Billery has a clue about the common man (or woman) in this country, they just want back into the White House and will say or do anything to get there.

May 5, 2008 11:34 AM

blackton said:

liberal, surely you know the phrase, lie down with dogs, get up with fleas? She is alienating the very people (left wing media) who she would most desperately need when the right wing media turns against her. Maybe they will fall in line behind her, but will the enthusiasm be there for her? She might be getting cred with the "powerless" poor whites, but hell, most Democrats have them already and it wasn't enough.

It is a sad day when a Democratic candidate for President comes out for anti-intellectualism.

May 5, 2008 11:38 AM

liberal reformer said:

Exactly, virginiacentrist.

May 5, 2008 11:41 AM

blackton said:

virginia, I must admit, there is a very small part of me that hopes Hillary can somehow become President because these self-same Republicans would know that they helped bring it about by providing Hillary with a life line when she needed it most. Honestly, it would be glorious to see the looks on their faces. If Obama is elected they will feign despair. (yes, they will be disappointed, but not shellshocked)

May 5, 2008 11:48 AM

liberal reformer said:

Yes, blackton, you are entirely correct. I have been blogging on this website about Hillary's disgusting new - found anti - elitism. I am just barely hanging on as a Clinton supporter because I think that Obama is much flash and little substance. I hope that events prove me in error.

May 5, 2008 12:01 PM

ratnerstar said:

Next week, Clinton will show her solidarity with the real losers of the Bush economy by downing a pint of Wild Irish Rose out of a paper bag.  Rosie with a skirt, Hillary -- that's what the voters want to see.

May 5, 2008 12:03 PM

icarusr said:

This from Mrs. Clinton's biographer:

www.huffingtonpost.com/.../the-shame-of-hillary-clin_b_99912.html

Dovetails neatly with the WS observation.

May 5, 2008 12:04 PM

Chris Orr said:

liberal reformer - It's good to have Clinton supporters posting here to keep us Obama fans honest--especially ones as honest about her flaws and compromises as you are. But please don't tie me to that Lieberman endorsement, which I strongly, and repeatedly, opposed in print at the time.

May 5, 2008 12:11 PM

blackton said:

liberal, don't worry about jacksondyer on the other thread, he can be very erudite and intelligent but also very crude. I pay attention to the former and let pass the latter.

He is also one of the few people whose reason for supporting Hillary I find reasonable. and there have been times I myself found her very appealing (a few debates, her Letterman appearance).

I truly don't understand this gas tax thing. She had Obama on the ropes (actually Wright put him there) and instead she drums up this tax issue which gave the media something else to talk about, and now she is trying to justify something she need never have done. Tactically this has to be one of her biggest blunders in a while (her Tuzla gaffe was not a tactical blunder, just a blunder).

May 5, 2008 12:26 PM

blackton said:

Chris, amen to that. jkolic, lymon, tammya, also function in this way. but some of the other Hillary supporters, good lord it is like arguing with a 3 year old.

As to the Democrats, maybe we do need our own Nixon and if it hadn't been for watergate he would have been regarded as a successful President. And I don't see Hillary getting caught.

May 5, 2008 12:34 PM