TNR BLOGS

September 06, 2008 | 3:43 PM
September 05, 2008 | 8:32 PM
September 05, 2008 | 8:16 PM

September 05, 2008 | 2:53 PM
September 05, 2008 | 3:45 AM
September 05, 2008 | 12:25 AM

September 06, 2008 | 3:14 PM
September 06, 2008 | 3:10 PM
September 05, 2008 | 4:28 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

September 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
September 03, 2008 | 1:01 PM
September 02, 2008 | 6:20 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.04.2008
The Ship of Shame

In perverse echoes of the voyage of the SS St. Louis, a shipment of Chinese arms headed for Zimbabwe has been sent back to the motherland today, after circling the Cape of Good Hope for more than a week. The An Yue Jiang, which bore three million rounds of assault rifle ammunition, 3,000 mortar rounds and 1,500 rocket-propelled grenades--all destined to serve the whims of Robert Mugabe—was stopped cold on the docks of Durban ten days ago. Happily, civilian workers orchestrated this harbor blockade, and their union stood behind them when the ruling party did not. It’s an encouraging signal of grassroots organizing and, unlike the 1939 catastrophe, demonstrates South Africans’ keen attention to the principle of combating “injustice anywhere.” As one union organizer rightly put it: "This is a great victory for the trade union movement in particular and civil society in general in putting its foot down and saying we will not allow weapons that could be used to kill and maim our fellow workers and Zimbabweans to be transported across South Africa."

Hear, hear. But in celebrating, let’s recall that such a just, nonviolent resolution is harder than it looks. For a tense moment, the South African port workers found themselves standing up to three authoritarian forces at once—China, Zimbabwe, and ruling party leader Jacob Zuma, who made haste to set up clearances as though this were typical cargo. And though Mozambique, Namibia and Tanzania gamely refused to abet the armament, earlier this week, AFP reported that longtime Mugabe ally (and Chinese trading partner) Angola would welcome the ship.

So in essence, China could have done as it pleased; that it did not highly recommends the methodology of shame that has been put to good use regarding Chinese action in Darfur last year and is a winning strategy for this year's Olympic games. Most tyrants, of course do not shame easily (cf. Mugabe and the rumblings of a power-sharing agreement); the real agency therefore lies not with the protesters, but with we onlookers, regarding and amplifying such resistance in ways history has taught us are all too rare.

--Dayo Olopade

Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:56 PM with 9 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

rozenson said:

This is why attending the Beijing Olympics is good for the cause of human rights. The media is drawing closer scrutiny to the abuses of the Chinese government. If American boycotted, suddenly our stake in the internal politcs of China decreases.

April 24, 2008 3:28 PM

adaglas said:

Thank goodness there are some brave souls in South Africa standing up for basic decency, while Mbeki continues to earn the title of Second-Most Irresponsible Leader of A Democracy Active Today.

April 24, 2008 3:44 PM

Rhubarbs said:

rozenson, even if I grant your argument -- and I'm not sure I do, though I totally agree that U.S. athletes should participate in Beijing -- I can't see how it would apply to President Bush attending the games himself. Wouldn't it be better for Bush to follow more than a century of precedent and not attend a foreign Olympics, thereby keeping the focus on China, not on himself?

April 24, 2008 3:46 PM

stgla said:

Bush should send John Yoo in his place ot the opening ceremonies. That would send a signal, no?

April 24, 2008 4:10 PM

blackton said:

stgla, sorry but sending a chinese guy to the olympics would be kind of lost on the Chinese leadership.

great post Dayo.

April 24, 2008 5:46 PM

jobeek2 said:

Encouraging news, Dayo, and thanks for bringing it.

April 24, 2008 6:03 PM

brantwill said:

Dude, I appreciate the post but I have problems with your oblique reference to the "1939 catastrophe."  I assume you're referring to the decision to remain neutral in World War II but I don't know that because, to be quite honest, I (and I daresay most the readers of TNR) don't know that much about South African history.  Of course I could be wrong and you're actually referring to some other "catastrophic" event in South Africa in 1939.  Either way, you come off, well, let's just say it's not flattering.  Please accept this as constructive criticism.  

April 24, 2008 11:14 PM

Robert Powell said:

"Constructive criticism"? brantwill should Google SS St. Louis and/or "Ship of Fools".

Great post Dayo.  I'll second adaglas on Mbeki, but if you think he's bad, just wait for Jacob Zuma...

blackton, I think stgla's  "send Yoo" idea is just fine, whether the Chinese get it right away or not. Be sure the press will draw a diagram for them.  But shouldn't we also be giving Bush credit for recognizing Morgan Tsvangirai's election victory?

April 25, 2008 3:34 AM

The Plank said:

You probably haven't heard of James McGee. He's our Ambassador in Harare, Zimbabwe. He's

May 17, 2008 10:38 PM