TNR BLOGS

July 24, 2008 | 6:54 PM
July 24, 2008 | 6:53 PM
July 24, 2008 | 6:53 PM

July 24, 2008 | 6:37 PM
July 24, 2008 | 4:58 PM
July 24, 2008 | 2:31 PM

July 23, 2008 | 7:28 PM
July 23, 2008 | 7:06 PM
July 23, 2008 | 3:04 PM

July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM
June 19, 2008 | 2:54 PM

July 23, 2008 | 1:31 PM
July 23, 2008 | 11:49 AM
July 22, 2008 | 8:06 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
21.04.2008
The Media's Eastern Centrism in Map Form

Strange Maps comes through again with this cool graphical representation of where wire stories are datelined. It's certainly not all that big a surprise that New York and DC dominate coverage, but the scale of their domination is pretty impressive--more stories are datelined in DC than in the entire state of California. And look how puny states like Texas, Illinois, and Ohio appear compared to smaller eastern states like Massachusetts and Connecticut.

It's also worth noting that perhaps the grossest political distortion journalism produces is toward federal politics, even though decisions made in state capitals and cities have nearly as much impact (if not more) on the everyday life of the average American as decisions made in Washington. The general level of awareness surrounding state and local issues is painfully low, and, as the American Journalism Review has noted:

Coverage of state government is in steep decline. In capital press rooms around the country, there are more and more empty desks and silent phones. Bureaus are shrinking, reporters are younger and less experienced, stories get less space and poorer play, and all too frequently editors just don’t care.

Not that this is all that surprising either--with a few notable exceptions, state government is decidedly unsexy, and nobody really likes writing (or reading) about policy. But the lack of quality coverage at the state level still poses a major quandary for those of us who believe that federalism is an underrated virtue.

--Josh Patashnik 

Posted: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:47 AM with 11 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

adaglas said:

I officially dub this the National Media Homunculus.

April 21, 2008 11:30 AM

ironyroad said:

Even state capitals of large states with significant economies, issues, and influence such as California have suffered that decline in media coverage.  In Sacramento the sound since the mid-90s has been the last reporters slamming the door behind them on the almost-empty press room.

April 21, 2008 11:34 AM

cspencef said:

Wow, I can barely even find my state in there...on the other hand, I'm not totally convinced this is a bad thing.

April 21, 2008 11:35 AM

derekcatsam said:

There is one factor to be considered however, which is that rather than saying that the media ignores state politics, the more likely reality is that they are given proportionate coverage within their states, and so that does not appear on a map intended, ultimately, to show the weight of national news. The states that appear here appear because of their national profile. What we are seeing is that national (and international) news stories are weighted toward these states and actually little about state news coverage assuiming that within the states local and state politics draw appropriate attention.

dcat  

April 21, 2008 11:57 AM

williamyard said:

This reminds me, I really gotta get my prostate reemed out.

April 21, 2008 2:18 PM

teplukhin2you said:

It'd be interesting to see a similar comparison of maps of the world and of US media coverage of the US vs foreign nations. China might be within striking distance of actual size but Russia, India, and other large and hugely important nations would be smaller than Rhode Island

April 21, 2008 2:40 PM

adaglas said:

"This reminds me, I really gotta get my prostate reemed out."

Medically or recreationally?

April 21, 2008 3:13 PM

williamyard said:

adaglas,

I've been relying on the latter (SH does a fine job, therapy-wise) but I'm seriously considering the former. I'd like to be able to pee even somewhat normally again, at least once in a while.

From what I can gather the gold standard is something called TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate), which is basically where they stick a Black and Decker variable-speed drill with a tiny saw on the end of the bit up Little Willie and give my prostate the Jamba Juice treatment from the inside out.

Afterwards you can recover mostly at home, at which time you do not--repeat, do not--want to accidentally step on the catheter, according to two friends who have had the procedure done. Then you're basically good to go, and go.

For obvious reasons, I've been procrastinating.

Have a nice dinner!

April 21, 2008 3:50 PM

adaglas said:

I'll take "Things You Won't Find in Official AARP Mailers" for 600, Alex.

April 21, 2008 4:22 PM

Crock1701 said:

I'd personally like to see this for sports news:  East Coast Bias seems far more prevalent there:  All the time we hear about Yanks-Sawx, or in College Hoops the ACC and UNC/Duke.

April 21, 2008 6:45 PM

ChanRobt said:

Yes, Eastern media domination, in all its parochial glory, does get damn old.  And, considering that the economy of California overshadows most of the Eastern seaboard states combined, it's way overdue stupid as well.

Which is why I could imagine a future, 50 years hence where nation-state California told the East Coast to take a big hike-ola and seceded.

Modern D.C. types are such wimps, they wouldn't pull a Lincoln.  They'd just let California walk.  Especially if it's a Democratic administration.  Copperheads to this day.

April 21, 2008 11:50 PM