TNR BLOGS

May 11, 2008 | 7:21 PM
May 11, 2008 | 1:47 PM
May 11, 2008 | 12:39 AM

May 09, 2008 | 2:11 PM
May 09, 2008 | 1:07 PM
May 08, 2008 | 5:01 PM

May 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
May 02, 2008 | 5:26 PM
May 02, 2008 | 2:40 PM

May 10, 2008 | 1:40 PM
May 09, 2008 | 6:40 PM
May 09, 2008 | 2:53 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
09.04.2008
United Colors of Obama

Via Marc Ambinder, Carnegie Mellon's student newspaper, The Tartan, exposes the sausage-making that goes into an Obama campaign event:

While the crowd was indeed diverse, some students at the event questioned the practices of Mrs. Obama’s event coordinators, who handpicked the crowd sitting behind Mrs. Obama. The Tartan’s correspondents observed one event coordinator say to another, “Get me more white people, we need more white people.” To an Asian girl sitting in the back row, one coordinator said, “We’re moving you, sorry. It’s going to look so pretty, though.”

“I didn’t know they would say, ‘We need a white person here,’ ” said attendee and senior psychology major Shayna Watson, who sat in the crowd behind Mrs. Obama. “I understood they would want a show of diversity, but to pick up people and to reseat them, I didn’t know it would be so outright.”

Ambinder deems this "[a] rare, unforced error committed by the Obama campaign's site advance teams"; but I don't really see how. Clearly, the Benneton-ish displays of diversity on the risers behind Obama (and Hillary, too) don't just happen by accident; the campaign advance teams are exquisitely sensitive to the racial make-up of the people standing behind the candidates, so, inevitably, they shuffle people around to make a prettier picture. I guess the error is the actual use of the words "white person" when doing the shuffling. Maybe they need to develop some code words: "We need a scoop of vanilla in the second row!"

--Jason Zengerle 

Posted: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:26 AM with 24 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

adaglas said:

I'd suggest using "Purple moons!  Yellow star!  Red Balloon!  Blue Horseshoes!" as codewords - a little less conspicuous who you mean, but possibly more confusing.

April 9, 2008 10:40 AM

ejbenjamin said:

Of course this is going to offend some sensibilities, but you'd be hopelessly naive to think that any serious campaign doesn't do this every day.

April 9, 2008 10:45 AM

sdmcleod said:

Years ago my mother (now 94) worked for a temp worker agency that used the term "greenies" for a particular racial group. Green was the color of the check mark next to their name. Our language is full of code words that mean something entirely different from their dictionary definition.

April 9, 2008 11:19 AM

ramboorider said:

"Of course this is going to offend some sensibilities, but you'd be hopelessly naive to think that any serious campaign doesn't do this every day."

At least the good ones do. After the Iowa caucuses, someone on Hillary's team should have ordered up a nice scoop of youth for the stage behind her and get rid of some of the gray-hairs that looked so depressed behind her. I guess she's learned that lesson since, but McCain still seems afflicted...

April 9, 2008 11:27 AM

Hungarian Great Bela Tarr said:

Ditto ej and rambo: I've been to dozens of these events, and they always hand-pick the crowd behind the candidate for maximum demographic impact. Hillary does it, Edwards did it, Obama does it. Of course, in lily-white Iowa, being non-white was much likelier to get you on the stage.

That being said: geez. Someone needs to train these people not to be so noisy and crass. Just grab people and politely ask them to move up (or down); don't shout "We need whites!"

April 9, 2008 11:58 AM

scottlooper said:

Hilarious, Zengerle: your recommendation is much like Texas's decision to implement a Top 10% rule for admissions to Texas universities so it wouldn't have to address affirmative action.  In the words of Shakespeare, "A rose by any other name . . ."

April 9, 2008 12:08 PM

WoodyBombay said:

At least no one said, "Hey, where the white women at?"

April 9, 2008 12:10 PM

marcellusw101 said:

I've never seen the pre-staging at a campaign event; I just assumed that it was done this way by everyone. How can the C-M students be so naive? I guess the Obama campaign's main mistake was using gen pop students for the backdrop instead of hardcore student supporters. The BHO campaign's apparatus is usually pretty leak-proof.

April 9, 2008 12:49 PM

williamyard said:

I would feel much better about our current election cycle if someone--Obama, Paul, whatever--had at least one cyclops in the adoring crowd.

The big, solitary central Eye leaking something disconcertingly translucent. Obama intones, "Yes we can!" and the Eye blinks back a tear!

Not just cyclops, but a couple of kids with hairlips. Also some Iraq War vets who used one side of their heads to slow down an IED. Throw in a bearded lady for good measure. With a squealing infant retching on her shoulder.

Sometimes when somebody's pushin' at ya (in this case, the MSM) you just gotta stand up and push back. Nobody gives a shit what you're talking about, anyway; you might as well try to get them to recoil from the glowing box in front of them...which they will find suddenly too fascinating to abandon.

You may not get what you (think you) want, but I guarantee the air will smell especially sweet after your well-deserved, sound sleep.

That's the problem with YouTube--as if their Jeremiah Wright snippets are the outliers, and the usual mainstream video crap is the median. In reality, freaks, maniacs, drug addicts, and desperate geniuses roam unmolested through our breakfast nooks and our minds; it's Mitt Romney or some similar clone droning on about scenic watershed funding at a Rotary Club luncheon that we should expect from YouTube--the true lies of civilization.

But somehow we've allowed the YouTube brand to be "them" and the balanced demographics behind Obama and the others to be "us." The ol' switcheroo.

[williamyard steps off the curb and barfs into the gutter, then belches happily. A pigeon waits for him to move on...]

April 9, 2008 1:23 PM

jacobt1 said:

Sure, They kicked out a black student because of color of his skin,  and nobody seems to mind. What's next?  If Obama publicly  molests a child would his supporters find excuses for him?

April 9, 2008 1:34 PM

stgla said:

Yeah, it seems like the problem is with the tact and language. I heard that someone said "We need a typical white person in the second row!"

This must happen all the time. I just assumed they have codewords for fatties, hotties, grandmas, nonthreatening black people, milfs, pink-faced lunchpail jockeys with trucker hats, and of course the elusive medditeranean-hispano-blackish-all race people that are sought after in marketing campaigns.

April 9, 2008 1:34 PM

psantillana said:

This would be a big deal if they'd hired some white people to pretend to be Obama supporters, but I can't blame them for wanting to scoot people around like that, since the other side likes to imply that white people won't vote for him. In related news, I heard from someone yesterday in North Carolina that Clinton people were handing out hand-made signs at a rally there for audience members to hold. I guess hoping people would think the crowd was so motivated that they'd made their own signs.

April 9, 2008 1:43 PM

achester99 said:

The presence of my yarmulke on my head got me right behind John Kerry in 2004. Being a token is kinda fun.

April 9, 2008 1:49 PM

blackton said:

willyard, for maximum effect then they can get that pregnant "man" and the two faced indian baby.

Man, let me tell you, my wife is pregnant and CNN's autism fest has given me such anxiety. It is one thing to be so tolerant and accepting of others misfortunes, but I can't deal with the thought it might happen to me so for now, thank you Bill but no thank you, just paint me as pretty a picture as you can.

April 9, 2008 1:51 PM

blackton said:

jesus jacob, get a grip. that is just foul. if you want to say something crude fine, but don't go there.

April 9, 2008 1:59 PM

jacobt1 said:

Go where?

April 9, 2008 2:19 PM

williamyard said:

Hey, Blackie, congrats to you and the OBAC (Old Ball and Chain)!

Teach the kid to blog. He or she piss away most of his or her life, but save a fortune on psychotherapy.

April 9, 2008 2:26 PM

psantillana said:

Congrats and good luck.

April 9, 2008 2:34 PM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

jacobtl seems to blend right in with pccostello, kirchick, and O'Channy in the sense that these boys can barely contain their toothgrinding annoynace with Obama and how his candidacy stands conventional politics  - and conventional notions of political advertising - on its head. White people identified and strategically placed in an ad!  What an outrage! That shouldn't be!  Don't these people know the rules???

I would love to be the choreographer who has the gleeful task of putting one of these thin skinned boys in the back of the rainbow bus. I have always wanted to see a head explode...

April 9, 2008 3:44 PM

newdex said:

The only "error" here is being the certain democratic nominee for president.  Of course this stuff goes on at all or most, or at least lots, of campaign events.   But since Obama is The Candidate of Racial Diversity, and a Democrat to boot, there will be more and more stories from now on, most of them completely out of context, questioning his image and showing what a phony he is.

My question to Jason Zengerle (or Mark Ambinder): Surely you must know that this sort of image coordination is normal in politics.  So if you have to talk about this kind of non-story, why not mention that fact?  Why is it an "error" on Obama's part that some reporter decided to emphasize an aspect of an Obama rally that, surely, any reporter could chose to emphasize about virtually any rally by any candidate, but for whatever reasons usually don't?  

April 9, 2008 4:27 PM

blackton said:

jacob, I would not say anything that noxious about Hillary. I could not even imagine her harming a child, nor can I possibly imagine anyone would excuse her if she did. Can't you have the same decency? At worst Hillary haters call her a vampriss, but that is harmless. And you can call Obama a fraud or charlatan or what have you. That is all fair game. You can even say if Obama took a dump on an Obamacans table, would they frame it? Gross, but not really offensive.

April 9, 2008 5:28 PM

Hungarian Great Bela Tarr said:

I'm afraid that many of you are missing JacobT's point, which is a valid one:

Because of the color of his skin, the Obama campaign demanded that a college student leave the premises; he was forbidden even to remain in the room to hear the speech. In fact, if you read the entire article, they actually escorted him out of the building and asked him not to attend any future Obama events until -- and I quote -- "[his] skin was a little lighter."

This touches on a subject that the Obama-adoring media -- and TNR's resident Obama cultists -- have been unwilling to address: Obama's fear and hatred of people of color. No, he didn't molest a child, nor was Jacob implying as much . . . but Obama does despise and distrust African-Americans and Asian-Americans. Are we really going to nominate a racist, and risk fracturing the party?

Because of Obama's racism . . . and the fact that his pastor is an Angry Black (making Obama the worst of both worlds: a black supremacist and a white supremacist) . . . and most of all this --www.huffingtonpost.com/.../bowling-blunders-matter_b_95759.html -- Obama cannot win the general election. The time for him to drop out is now.

PS, to the Obama cultists: I dare you to read the HuffPo bowling editorial and explain to me how Obama can possibly win a general election. He's Dukakis 2.0.

April 9, 2008 7:31 PM

The Interpreter said:

'Get me more white people'

April 9, 2008 7:34 PM

stgla said:

Hungarian - WTF???

Where did this come from???

"Because of the color of his skin, the Obama campaign demanded that a college student leave the premises; he was forbidden even to remain in the room to hear the speech. In fact, if you read the entire article, they actually escorted him out of the building and asked him not to attend any future Obama events until -- and I quote -- "[his] skin was a little lighter.""

I read the entire Tartan article and did not see this.  I also clicked through the huffpost piece on Obama's bowling that you linked to.  It was a horrifically illogical and confused column trying to equate Obama's low bowling score to Dukakis' ill-fated photo-op in a tank.  Again, WTF?  The author of that piece tries to argue that candidates should be themselves and not try to stretch, but goes on to criticize Kerry for snowboarding and windsurfing.

April 10, 2008 4:49 PM