TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
01.04.2008
McCain: A Soldier of the Great War

Ed Kilgore has some interesting thoughts about the biographical message John McCain is rolling out this week:

While there's nothing uncommon or surprising about John McCain's highlighting of his own military record, his decision to identify himself as primarily the product of the military ethic, by family background as well as by personal experience, is unusual, and perhaps risky in a country that has always honored professional warriors but has also insisted on civilian control of the military. It's no accident that the last Annapolis graduate to become president, Jimmy Carter, chose to identify himself as a peanut farmer rather than as a nuclear submarine officer.

McCain's insistence on establishing a distinguished pedigree is counter-intuitive as well. The current president of the United States, after all, went to inordinate lengths to create a public persona remote from his actual aristocratic background as grandson of a U.S. senator and son of a president. Another president who often touted his own military service--John F. Kennedy--did so in no small part to provide a common link to Americans who might otherwise dwell on his father's wealth and political connections. FDR's polio, and TR's cowboy-hunter-soldier machismo, offset their elite backgrounds. And most American presidents and presidential candidates have talked about their ancestors mainly to stress their humble roots, and thus accentuate their own accomplishments. In the Meridian speech and elsewhere, John McCain seems to be visibly struggling, even today, to live up to his family's martial tradition. It's all pretty remarkable.

I think this is definitely a risky strategy for McCain. While Ed rightly points out that McCain's offering a "more appealing" version of the political package Bob Dole presented in 1996, I do think he's still getting very close to Dole territory.

When I read the speech McCain gave the other day in Meridian, Mississippi, I was impressed with the stories and the writing, much like I was impressed with the stories and the writing in Faith of My Fathers. Mark Salter, McCain's speechwriter who co-wrote Fathers and who I'm assuming penned the Meridian speech, is a very gifted writer. But I wonder if Salter's particular style of writing lends itself more to books than to campaign speeches. In a way, Salter's speeches for McCain remind me of the speeches the novelist Mark Helperin wrote for Dole in 1996 (including Dole's resignation speech from the Senate): Soaring meditations on valor and honor but ones that ultimately make the candidate seem archaic and leave voters depressed rather than excited.

I was talking to one McCain friend about this a while back and he made a smart point about the effect Salter's speeches have on McCain. "He's like the last World War One veteran marching alone in the vets parade," this McCain friend said. He added, "There's a melancholy undercurrent to everything McCain says. He understands the sadness of life. That's one of the reasons the press likes McCain, writers get sadness. But your average Sprint salesman doesn't want to hear that." I don't think many Sprint salesmen are going to be won over by McCain's words this week.

--Jason Zengerle 

Posted: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:13 PM with 13 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Annabella2 said:

HUMMM... it would be curious if it worked given the claim that it hasn't in the past for Dole... but McCain is moire appealing and less dour... but military hero in a time that the US is very dubious about our current military venture... on the other hand, unlike during Vietnam, there is a real sense of support for the troops doing a job that the civilians have told them they have to go to do....Also... McCain may be sad... but Dole was dour... so it may play differently and people do like McCain and somehow trust him as a human being....

April 1, 2008 11:04 PM

Annabella2 said:

Mr. Zengerle is quite right about this speech... it is a written not a spoken one and it sounds like an honorable old man reminiscing for his grandchildren about his honorable service and his family's honorable history.  What ever political message there is is buried in long winded sentences... Everyone likes and respects McCain's bio... but a political leader in a time of trouble with this ?  Doesn't convince me and if it isn't Obama I sure want to be convinced.

April 1, 2008 11:14 PM

ryanmacd said:

I respect and honor McCain's service liberating Belgium from the evil Huns.

April 1, 2008 11:56 PM

lesserliz said:

McCain doesn't equal General McArthur, a mlitary icon with much more grandiose sevice and honorable family history. And he had to be fired by Truman cause he wanted to bomb bomb nuclear bomb China. If McCain becomes CinC who is going to fire him?

April 2, 2008 12:00 AM

raylward said:

I appreciate McCain's service and that of his family.  But service alone does not dinstinguish McCain, for it is an American tradition.  My grandfather died from wounds suffered in the Spanish American War.  My only uncle died in France in WWII.  My brother served in Turkey during the Cold War.  My brother in law was a Marine in Viet Nam.  No, my family is no more patriotic than any other.  And neither is McCain's.

April 2, 2008 8:14 AM

PeteBeck said:

Zengerle and the other comments above miss, I think, two basic points:

First, McCain's career has consisted of essentially two parts of approximately equal length:  military service (including Annapolis) and US Congress (House and Senate).  I don't think that anyone on his staff expects him to win solely because of his bio -- rather, the point is to show that  meets the threshold standard for a president since he is well qualified, experienced in the ways of the world, reliable, patriotic, 100% American, a regular guy (unlike MacArthur) and trustworthy.  By implication, both of his two potential opponents don't meet that threshold standard.

Second, they fail to appreciate the importance of national security in this election.  It will not be "it's the economy, stupid."  Rather, it will be"it's the economy, medical care and defense against terrorism, stupid."  McCain will need to convince voters that he can deal with the economy and medical care in a way that helps the broad base of Americans, which I doubt will happen.  But on the defense issue, he is miles ahead of both Clinton and Obama.

My own view is that the best way the Democratic candidate can offset McCain's bio/anti-terrorism message is have a VP candidate with equal or greater credentials.  General Clark comes to mind.

April 2, 2008 9:19 AM

bcbaird said:

How big of a demographic are Sprint salesmen?  Is it large enough to be a critical swing vote in the coming election?

All of this aside, I think McCain leaves himself open to criticism by constantly mentioning his military service.  As raylward points out, McCain wasn't the only one to serve in that war or the only one willing to make sacrifices for his country.  He's just the only one running for president.  

Will the American people buy the idea that his service makes him unique and his platform sound?  Some might.  But with more and more Americans sour on the war in Iraq (and with the memory of 9/11 slowly fading) I wouldn't rule out his hawkish stance becoming a liability.

I'm torn on Clark.  On one hand, I think he is a smart and capable strategist with unparalleled vision when it comes to the applications of force in the modern world.  But he's been a do-nothing since he dropped out of the 2004 race, mainly wasting his time fundraising, keeping a low profile and since last year, campaigning for Clinton.  Should he be dug up and ran as veep, I don't know how that will help Obama considering Clark has been Clinton's bitch for the entire campaign.

April 2, 2008 10:21 AM

spencer97m said:

One of the best comments I've read lately (can't remember where, unfortunately) is that the presidency of the US is not a lifetime achievement award - it should go to the person who will be the best choice for the future.  This is why I think Obama would do so well against McCain - he's clearly a forward-looking choice.

April 2, 2008 11:32 AM

The Plank said:

As Jason notes below , John McCain's biographical speech was a good imitation of Bob Dole, circa

April 2, 2008 11:43 AM

blackton said:

I gotta say, watching McCain on Letterman last night (a little stiff but earnest) shows he is miles above Hillary as a person. Even now when he can be sniping at non issues like HIllary does, he has been simply poking fun at Obama's positions. So far I can't recall a single moment when I have felt indignant at something he has said in relation to Obama, unlike Hillary and her cronies like Lanny Davis who seem to relish pissing off fellow Democrats.

petebeck "defense against terrorism." I dunno about that one, when peoples housing prices are melting down, I think they will have a far less tendency to worry about a Nuclear meltdown. After 7 years and two wars the only terrorist attack that occurred was the initial one. I just can't see the whole "elect me, or maybe some people in New York City might die again" being as big. Beyond that, McCain will run as a Conservative Democrat in the general (kind of like a Gov. Bob Casey of Pa. type) Socially conservative but empathetic to the working class. Even on Letterman he was all bleeding heart for poor homeowners.

April 2, 2008 11:56 AM

bcbaird said:

blackton, I don't watch Letterman any more, but did he do "Top Ten Things That Are Older Than John McCain"?  Because I might start watching again if he did...

April 2, 2008 1:20 PM

teplukhin2you said:

If inflation keeps soaring, the national security issue will be transformed from the terrorism threat to the Chinese threat. It's Chinese demand that's driving the huge runup in prices for every commodity on the planet, including wheat, corn, rice etc.

That's a huge opening for our side, but it requires a candidate who can not only connect the dots but who also cares, passionately, about his or her vision for helping Americans deal with what has always been, post-Cold War, the number one issue: how to maintain our prosperity and primacy in a world in which economic other forms of power are inexorably shifting toward Asia.

That candidate, par excellence, was Bill Clinton. I don't see that same level of analytic brilliance re economics in Obama. Economics simply doesn't seem to be his thing.

Re. McCain, he's probably going to put Romney on the ticket and have him make precisely this case-- that the GOP is better equipped to deal with the intersection of economic security and nat-sec'y issues -- to Reagan Dems in the rust belt. That would be a serious threat to our chances in the fall.

April 2, 2008 2:38 PM

The Plank said:

This new McCain web ad really has to be seen to be believed. It's basically a tribute video to the

April 4, 2008 10:34 AM