TNR BLOGS

November 20, 2008 | 11:23 AM
November 20, 2008 | 10:57 AM
November 20, 2008 | 10:48 AM

November 20, 2008 | 10:45 AM
November 19, 2008 | 11:20 PM
November 19, 2008 | 9:29 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

November 20, 2008 | 11:06 AM
November 19, 2008 | 3:17 PM
November 19, 2008 | 2:17 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
21.03.2008
Reflecting on a Bad Week for the Economy

Throughout the week, Clay Risen, the managing editor of Democracy, will be covering economic developments for us on The Plank. 

There are a lot of people putting a lot of thought into the last week's worth of business news. But if there's anything like a conventional wisdom to be drawn, it's this: 1) We're definitely in recession territory--given the vagaries of spot data, we don't know if we're just before one, in the middle, or at the tail end--and it's probably going to be worse than the last. 2) So far the worst of the damage has been limited to Wall Street banks and high-risk mortgages. 3) A combination of luck and timely Fed action has prevented things from getting out of hand, but as the brokers all say, past performance is no guarantee of future success. 4) We kind of had all this coming, and since so far things aren't all that bad, it might not be a terrible idea to let the chips fall where they may, with the federal government standing by to ease the worst of it and make sure the damage doesn't spread outward. That means aid to responsible homeowners who somehow got trapped in bad mortgages, combined with new regulations on mortgage lenders and brokers. It also means having enough foresight to intervene selectively, but not capriciously, on Wall Street; the risk of creating moral hazards is real, but so is a massive banking implosion.

What this all points to is a new balance between facilitating responsible risk-taking and government activism to limit abuse and offer a corrective hand when absolutely necessary. Think of it like medicine: There's no cure to the common cold, and an occasional cold is probably a good thing, if only as an indicator that our body is worn down and needs rest. But once we have a cold, smart people take the right steps to prevent it from worsening into a sinus infection or what have you. The government shouldn't be there to prevent recessions; those are normal, healthy parts of the business cycle, and in any case it probably couldn't if it tried. But it can help the people who are hurt by recessions, and when led by smart people, it has the capacity to prevent disorderly crunches that could lead to much worse.

--Clay Risen

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 3:57 PM with 5 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

buffaloboy said:

Wow, finally some common sense on the economy.  By all means, the looney risk takers need to know that it is possible to buy a losing lottery ticket every once in a while.  Seeing a few Wall Street brokerages and investment banks going out of business would be one of the best things that could ever happen to this country.  I haven't followed the details enough to know who should or shouldn't walk the plank, but I hope Bear Stearns isn't the last one to disappear.

A mild recession would do this country a lot of good.  A depression obviously wouldn't.  So the focus for the government should be "do no harm" - they've already done seven+ years of harm since Bush walked in the door, and overreacting could very easily make things much, much worse.

March 21, 2008 4:08 PM

roidubouloi said:

Yeah, okay. This is pretty old hat.  But the "aid" that Wall Street likes is lower interest rates.  That doesn't particularly help the people who lose their jobs.  But the money types resist helping people who lose their jobs because, according to the moneterist types, if they were in greater distress real wages would fall faster and the recession would end faster.  Plus, aid to help people who lose their jobs is deemed to encourage "dependency,"  .  .  .

Never mind.  The whole thing is tiresome.  Basically, you have to decide whose side you are on in this world, labor or capital.  While it is true that you can't have one without the other, it is also true that various policies have different effects on the allocation of risks and the allocation of income.  

Right now, we have a reasonably functional Fed that will not solve the problem because monetary policy alone cannot fix what ails us, nor can the unfettered market.  We need a sound fiscal policy and sound policy as to public infrastructure and regulation of industry to prevent abuses.  We have none of the three because the government is headed by a brain dead kleptocrat who cares only about responding to the pleas of his pals to keep stuffing more largesse into their elready gorged selves.

The polite policy chit chat should not be permitted to obscure that fundamental problem.

March 21, 2008 4:10 PM

The Ignorant Populist said:

Yea exactly right Clay. I think we've been in recession for a few months now. It's also worth noting that the Dow had a really Bullish week last week and is poised to do the same over the coming weeks with a really nice Morning Star on the weekly. Look for strength next week.

Your post made me think of my old economic professor. A real old school Prof (insisted we have spotless desks before the lecture that would reflect our uncluttered minds) he used to teach us that it was governments role to save, repay debt, or even raise taxes when the economy was good so as to avoid bubbles. Consequently, these savings and investments could then be used, either as public spending or tax cuts when the economy dipped into recession.

That's basic, text book economics. What a pity we've had two Republican administrations.

March 21, 2008 4:18 PM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

Clay,

I have not received my new issue of Democracy Journal. When does the Spring issue come out?

KGallegos

March 21, 2008 6:30 PM

jcooney said:

@ buffaloboy:

"Seeing a few Wall Street brokerages and investment banks going out of business would be one of the best things that could ever happen to this country."

I'd like to see the rest of the list...

March 23, 2008 10:24 PM