TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
18.03.2008
Todd Gitlin Reviews Obama's Speech

We reached out to several friends of the magazine to respond to Obama's big speech in Philadelphia today. Here's what Todd Gitlin, professor of journalism and sociology at Columbia University, had to say.

This speech was a triumph on so many levels, does one dare hope it will turn the trick for hordes of parsing skeptics and listeners whose eyes did not water?

First, Obama took the high road, which is also the long and demanding road. He refused to "move on" with a cursory acknowledgment that "mistakes were made." He did not acknowledge. He preached and he reasoned. The law professor was in the pulpit. He refused to settle for sprinkling what have become the automatic contemporary word-drops of "distancing." It will still be possible to parse his words for insufficiencies of denunciation, but Obama's gamble was that he could turn Wright's damnable sins into a pivot for a sermon about how the past can be overcome, about how American it would be to accomplish that hard and necessary objective. "We may have different stories but we hold common hopes"--that was the theme. I don't know if this is true, but we will find out whether it is what America needs to believe.

"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community," he said of the Reverend Wright.  "I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother--a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.  These people are a part of me.  And they are a part of America, this country that I love."  Now, the Reverend Wright's damnations were not simple expressions of racial fear. Or were they? With his little history lesson, extrapolated from black experience to everyone else's paranoia--all that white anger "grounded in legitimate concerns"--Obama was saying that those statements of Wright he rejected and denounced stemmed from a long ugly history of racial fear; and that the only people to overcome "the racial stalemate" with are the people one belongs to. Politics is crucial, politics is the only way America will improve, but the place of politics is among imperfect persons. He did not flatter America by saying the only angels of its nature are the better ones.

An interesting subtext: filial pride. Family values, you might say. Wright, a parental force, stands for him as a man who came from somewhere, an imperfect American. America, in other words, is imperfect and drives toward a higher form of imperfection. Wright's error was in speaking as if society was static! So Obama challenged his listeners: Are you, with Wright, stuck in the past, or are you ready to roll? What Obama was saying is that America is a perennially self-starting community paradoxically mired in the past, but its opportunity is to overcome that past, and its test is to strive to do that--not by demonization but on a couple of wings and a lot of prayers.

And finally, the temperature of this speech is one of its messages; or should I say invitations? Obama kept his cool and turned up the heat at the same time. For those who have not yet voted, and crucially to the superdelegates, he raised the stakes, asking them all: Can you, too, keep your cool and your heat at the same time? The Reverend Jeremiah Wright, he said, had spoken in an "incendiary" manner, but Obama offered himself as the man who rises from flames and invites you to rise from your own. He took a grievous embarrassment and moved his lesson to the plane of prophecy. Talk about hope; talk about audacity. Tears came to my eyes. I don't think I'm especially hard-hearted, but I cannot think of another time when the speech of a presidential candidate watered me up.

At his own moment of crisis, in 1952, Richard Nixon finicked his way into history accompanied by a non-returnable cocker spaniel named Checkers. In 2008, Obama chose his own game: a new hybrid of chess. It might be a game-changer. We'll find out.

--Todd Gitlin

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 8:47 PM with 13 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Telezeugma said:

Well I am a crusty old retired country judge who has sent his share of men and women to prison for life without parole, before which I was a prosecutor who brought charges against some vicious racketeers.  So, I guess I could be called "hard-hearted." But, after reading the transcript of that speech those were tears not age blurring my vision.

March 18, 2008 4:15 PM

LDuncan said:

Outstanding.  Now I don't have to slave over the keyboard to figure out how to express to my friends my admiration for that speech.  I can just email them Gitlin's analysis.  Gitlin perfectly expresses my sentiments.

March 18, 2008 4:17 PM

Wandreycer1 said:

A very moving post Telezeugma!  

Also, Gitlin nails it.

March 18, 2008 4:46 PM

Gavriel Meir-Levi said:

Amen Todd, it truly is up to us!

March 18, 2008 5:44 PM

psantillana said:

You know what has only just recently sunk into me [I saw it several hours ago, live on msnbc]? At the end, when he stopped the speech with a terse "thank you" - this was not a rousing finish, and it was delivered with a look that seemed almost sad. When I read complaints that the speech had a flat delivery, for him, I agree with Gitlin, that the tone was right for the context. But I think about that look at the end, and I also come away with this idea that Obama was forced into this by events - wrote that speech over 2 days and nights and finished it at 3:30 this morning - and even though he's sticking to his hope and his high road, he doesn't really know how this will play out.

March 18, 2008 5:49 PM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

Haven't had time to see the speech yet. Too busy trying to clean up after AH-nold's recored budget deficit here in CA...

i just quickly read it moments ago and it read well, almost too well for a culture that has the attention span of your average sugar addled two year old.

Interesting to compare this to other "watershed" speeches - Checkers, JFK's Catholic speech, the Romney non entity - and see how this affects BO's future. I think it will have a great impact.

ILiving in the Bay Area, I know people like the Rev Wright who have this angry pov. It is one that I have always moved away from and reflexively rejected. Rev Wright is not anomalous though, particularly in marginalized communities. Doesn't make Wright right, but put into context, it makes it less startling. I was also surprised to learn that the Rev was a Marine. Bad ass mother f-er. I wouldn't want to get into a fracas with the Rev. I would like to see some of these frothing FOX commentators meet the Rev, face to face. I'd pay hard cash to see that real life sh-t.  

If Obama's speech can quell the controversy, I see him moving forward. This has been the single most juiciest opportunity for folks were desperately searching for a reason to reject Obama to get their wish.  It may still work. McCain can have his set of bigots but Obama may not get that kind of pass on this one.

March 18, 2008 6:08 PM

Rhubarbs said:

The thing that I always found most endearing about Bill Clinton was that he almost always talked up to his audience, not down. If it took an hour and a half to explain his plans for the coming year, then by gum his State of the Union address would take an hour and a half and he trusted Americans to have the patience to stay tuned and the brains to follow his reasoning. Every time, the pundits moaned about how his speeches were too long, too detailed, and people didn't want to site for an hour and a half listening to a politician speaking to them like competent adults. But every time, people did have the sitting power and mental capacity of grown-ups after all, and the longer Bill spoke the more people liked his speech.

I find that quality in Obama's non-stump speeches. And it's worth remembering that every time past American politicians have managed to change the direction of public opinion, they've done so by reasoning at some length with the American people. From Jackson's public letters to Lincoln's carefully crafted legal arguments to FDR's fireside chats to Reagan's early presidential addresses, our most effective leaders have always succeeded by tackling complexity head-on and at reasoned length. Obama today was the first politician since Bill Clinton who convinced me he has the ability to do the same as president.

March 18, 2008 6:35 PM

blackton said:

cookie, that is right. the yahoo vote was going to McCain anyhow. I do admire McCain's reaction to this whole controversy, in effect saying "I want no part of it." I still believe an Obama-McCain election could be one of the best that we have had for a generation.

March 18, 2008 6:52 PM

caaggies said:

"I do admire McCain's reaction to this whole controversy, in effect saying "I want no part of it.""

And why should he? If your opponent is self-destructing, the last thing you EVER do is to pile on.

March 18, 2008 8:58 PM

adisarro said:

Easy Gitlin, enthusiasm is good, but you're coming off like Gary Busey at the Oscars.

March 18, 2008 10:34 PM

CharlesFosterKane said:

Well, the National Review has turned you into a whipping boy. Their sneering condescension on this whole speech (with a few exceptions) has driven me nuts, but I wrote about that elsewhere. The extent to which many conservatives only want to move beyond race on their own selfish terms is becoming more apparent to me now than it's ever been in the past. And they call Obama naive...

March 19, 2008 1:28 AM

The Plank said:

We reached out to several friends of the magazine to respond to Obama's big speech in Philadelphia

March 19, 2008 4:32 PM

Marshabar's answers on Yedda - People. Sharing. Knowledge. said:

Marshabar answered: re:Each and every week, there's a new Obama book and dvd and shirt as well. So my question is, why is everybody acting Obama is jesus or a savior, he's only been in office for ohhh i dunno less than 6 months and yet there's not much

June 2, 2009 10:59 PM