TNR BLOGS

January 09, 2009 | 9:00 AM
January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:50 PM
January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
18.03.2008
David Kusnet Reviews Obama's Speech

We reached out to several friends of the magazine to respond to Obama's big speech in Philadelphia today. Here's what David Kusnet, a former speechwriter for Bill Clinton, had to say.

Barack Obama isn't lucky. He makes the best of circumstances that could destroy less gifted leaders. For quite some time, he has been capable of moving beyond the usual banalities about race in America. But it took the kind of crisis that sinks some campaigns--the furor over his former pastor's inflammatory sermons--to create the occasion for the best speech about race in recent memory.

Skillfully, Obama weaved a repudiation of the Reverend Wright into a much larger theme about American history. We are an imperfect nation, consisting of flawed individuals and forever scarred by our "original sin of slavery."  But we are on a journey towards fulfilling the promise of our founding documents, which all along contained the answers for the American Dilemma. In this context, Wright's rage is one more example of human frailty, along with other instances of black rage, white resentment, the evasions of generations of national leaders, and the problems that afflict all of us, if only we had the wisdom and vision to look beyond the barriers of race.

An inspiring message it is, and Obama presented it brilliantly, referring to or riffing off of an eclectic range of sources that go far beyond the most familiar sayings of the Rev. Martin Luther King. What other national leader--much less an African American--ever illuminated a plea for racial justice by quoting William Faulkner: "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even past." While quoting William Faulkner, Obama echoed the sociologist William Julius Wilson's emphasis on race-neutral policies. Indeed, Obama's plea for "binding our particular grievances-- for better health care, and better schools and better jobs--to the larger aspirations of all Americans" recalls the social democratic tradition that Wilson frequently cites, including the labor leader A. Philip Randolph and the civil rights strategist Bayard Rustin. Lastly, by explaining how imperfect people can forge "a more perfect union," Obama implicitly invoked the Great Emancipator himself, Abraham Lincoln.

Subtly but skillfully, Obama strummed Americans "mystic chords of memory." By beginning with the words "we the people," he called to mind Barbara Jordan who also cited the preamble to the Constitution in her statement on the impeachment of President Nixon at the House Judiciary Committee in 1974. By speaking of "doing God's work here on Earth," he quoted John F. Kennedy's inaugural address. And, by acknowledging that Wright "elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America," he recalled the most quoted line from Bill Clinton's first inaugural speech.

Ironically, Bill Clinton is the only recent national figure who has spoken as effectively about race as Obama just did. During the Michigan primary in 1992, Clinton gave the same speech to a black audience in Detroit and a white audience in suburban Macomb Country. He spoke bluntly to both, acknowledging black rage at centuries of racism and white fear of crime and resentment of welfare. But "we will go up or down together," Clinton warned. "This has to be a country for everyone." There was the same bluntness to Obama's acknowledgement that some have claimed his campaign is "based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap."

As with Clinton in Michigan, Obama's most important audience is working class whites who, as he shrewdly observed, "don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race." In yet another original touch, he concluded with the story of Ashley, a campaign worker whose mother lost her job and her health insurance while suffering from cancer. Ashley's plight aroused the compassion of an older man who also worked in Obama's campaign. But, in a twist on stereotypes, Ashley is white, and the older campaign worker is black.

Obama isn't "playing the race card" here. He's playing the hand that was dealt him--brilliantly and creatively.

--David Kusnet

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:17 PM with 21 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

psantillana said:

As somebody said on Jack and Jill Politics - this Wright ordeal was the 3AM call for Obama's campaign, and his response could not have been better.

March 18, 2008 5:59 PM

jm_rice said:

So, the Plank lines up its hand-picked Obamaphile flacks for a love fest.  What a bunch of precious twerps!

"Bill Clinton is the only national figure who has spoke as effectively about race as Obama just did."

And you were a speech writer?

Pathetic.

March 18, 2008 6:14 PM

veramehta said:

David Kusnet's review could not have put it better. It was an extraordinary speech-honest, subtle, reflective and inspiring. It served to convince me even more strongly that Barack Obama should be our next President.

March 18, 2008 6:23 PM

nturner said:

Editors at the New Republic are too busy having white guilt orgasms over Barack Obama to see that Obama is a racist sympathizer -- at least when it benefits him.  One apparently has to go to (and I can't believe I'm saying this!) the National Review for an honest reaction to Obama's loathsome speech:

Lopez says, "The more I think about this speech, the more I think Obama said: Damn straight, Rev. Wright is angry. That's how I wound up at his church. That's why I stay there. I'm mad too, I just control it better. Now let's get electing me president so we can all feel good."

Barack Obama just lost the general election.

March 18, 2008 6:24 PM

blackton said:

wow nturner, taking cues from J. Lopez on how to think? Love him or hate him his speech was the truth. Why are you such a bitter and angry individual? I downloaded this speech for posterity because it will be remembered by posterity.

nturner, when Lincoln got done with the Gettysburg address, his speech was panned by cranks like yourself. And you can read the reaction in Southern papers to MLK's speeches. His speech today, like Lincolns, like MLK's,  will be remembered, you won't be.

He may never be President, and I can accept that, but I shall not be bitter because of it, and accept that we still have a long way to go in our society, but that day will come. And I have no doubt for one such as yourself it will be a bitter day.

March 18, 2008 6:47 PM

fougasseu said:

Maybe he did just lose the general election.

He secured the nomination.

Felt good to be a Democrat today.

I listened to Limbaugh's reaction: vile. He spliced together the worst of Wright, the best of Obama, and he thought it was hysterically funny.

We don't have a serious race problem in this country?

Good speech, Kusnet nailed it.

What a strange country. A conservative Republican today told me he's going to support Obama because of his kids. Maybe Obama's fate is in the hands of America's young people. Too many of the older crowd is so cynical, they just can't listen with open hearts, open minds.

March 18, 2008 6:49 PM

blackton said:

fougasseu  that is right. When nutjob conservatives like Lopez have to rewrite the speech and then condemn their rewriting they are in trouble. the ending of his speech was sublime, "mustard and relish sandwiches" "I am here for Ashley" I mean damn, it couldn't possibly be any better than that. Even a Hollywood screenwriter couldn't write it better than that. I wonder how it will turn out for Ashley Baia, who in essence was the counterpoint of the whole speech, that we are all here so that a little 9 year old girl doesn't feel she has to eat relish and mustard sandwiches to save her cancerous mother money.

Yes, "loathsome" speech indeed.

March 18, 2008 7:24 PM

PeteBeck said:

What Obama did not say, and honestly could not say, was something like this:

    "Yes, I know Reverend Wright's views, which are not mine.  And in our private times together, I have repeatedly challenged him, hoping and praying that he could put aside the anger and, even, hatred that torment him.  Unfortunately, I was not successful."

Beyond that, Obama should have addressed this over a year ago.  Maybe he isn't such a clever politician after all.

March 18, 2008 7:36 PM

Ghost in the Machine said:

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised...

March 18, 2008 7:38 PM

blackton said:

PeteBeck, great point, I have a friend who makes anti-semitic statements a lot, not too publicly but publicly enough and I have had arguments with him about it. We have been friends for over 25 years and when I was young I myself made many such stupid statements, I outgrew it, he hasn't entirely. I am not going to not be friends with him over this issue since he has never done any action that has been anti-semitic, which is where I would draw the line. Has Rev. Wright done anything anti-American, literally done anything or has he just run his mouth?

March 18, 2008 8:01 PM

s4200 said:

Obama got the call at 3AM

One minute later, he was ready with his usual triangulation.

Can this guy move back to his fictional world, and leave us some decency?

His accidental blackness will set back the cause of the real black population by decades.

March 18, 2008 8:15 PM

aeromonas said:

jm_rice, you are a bile-filled, self-righteous prig, every bit as full of yourself--and full of shit--as you accuse Obama of being.

The other day you called Michael Crowley a fatuous son-of-a-bitch for the crime of wishing Obama success in putting the Wright affair behind him.  Please,  enough.  If the open, self-acknowledged support of some writers at this journal of OPINION galls you, please present your counterarguments without the invective, and if you prove unable to sever the direct line between your amygdala and your keyboard, then exercise your right to go away.

March 18, 2008 9:48 PM

ironyroad said:

I thought it was pretty good, all in all.  I wish he had addressed the paranoia issue a little more, however.  The paranoia among whites (Obama's a secret muslim etc etc) is matched by paranoia among blacks (AIDS was a government plot etc etc).

I wish there was more common sense and intelligence out there.

March 18, 2008 9:52 PM

matthawk said:

It occurs to me that Obama is engaged in a really big gamble; that he is, in fact, testing Shelby Steele's thesis.

Steele said that as soon as Obama addresses the issue of "race" head-on and in detail he will meltdown politically. If the comments on the blogs tonight are any indication, Steele may very well be proven right. The amazing thing is that Obama would call Steele's bluff and do exactly the thing that Steele said Obama is both politically and emotionally incapable of doing.

There has never been a more thorough or nuanced discussion of race relations in America in the political arena than Obama's speech this morning. Now it is time to see the reaction. If Steele is correct, Obama will continue to shed support from disillusioned whites who can no longer project onto him whatever inspires them. This is a test of whether or not an African American, who allows himself to be known, is electable at this point in American history.

Obama seems to believe the time has come, and that the nation has matured enough for this to be possible. There have been too many times when Obama's optimism has outstripped my doubts and he has been proven right while I have been proven wrong. I am hesitant to bet against him this time around. I'll just wait and see.

Obama’s refrain, whether talking about white slumlords profiting from inner-city misery, or black anger that feeds racial divisiveness, is to understand that people are imperfect – that we are a mix of heroism and folly. He can accept the mixed legacy of a society, just as he can accept the mix of strengths and weaknesses in individuals. His fundamental belief, however, is that America can change.

The impact of the speech, in immediate political terms, remains to be seen. The impact historically, however, is already pretty much assured.

March 19, 2008 1:56 AM

CharlesFosterKane said:

Incidentally, I just can't get that up-in-arms over Rev. Wright's statements. For one thing, they kept playing the clip where he talks about killing innocent people in Hiroshima & Nagasaki. Uh, well, hate to break it to you but that's true. Context is important and there was no point in bringing this up after 9/11 (did he making TNR's Idiot Watch?) but watching the clip, even my dad shrugged his shoulders and he's pretty much a Reagan Democrat. Though he turned right after the 80s and will vote for a Democrat-not-named-Hillary this year for the first time in a couple decades (unless you count writing in Jimmy Carter in '92 -- yeah, he's an odd kind of Reagan Democrat).

The "Goddamn America" trope was certainly cringe-worthy but perhaps I just have a double standard on this type of rhetoric. When I was in college and whiny overpriveleged white kids in dreads and Che shirts screamed shrilly about freeing Palestine and hating America I wanted to drop an ACME anvil on them. When a 60-year-old ex-Marine who lived at a time when "segregation was the law of the land" (oops, the eminent Derb scolds Obama for saying this, since it was only the law in PART of the land) , when someone like him says it, well, I just can't get as worked up.

Anyway, I thought Obama's response was just right save for one detail: he should have been able to say, I've spoken to him about this many times in the past, expressing my disagreement, and it's a real point of contention between us.

March 19, 2008 2:03 AM

Wandreycer1 said:

Important point CharlesFosterKane about context.  

All of these ofay prissy vapors over this amuses me.  I agree with Wright on his point damning America - any country that allows its conservative intellegensia to create a prison industrial complex that makes them even wealthier - while putting out memos about "harvesting" new prisoners - well? Sounds damned to me.  The whole faux outrage over what Wright said makes me sick really - pay attention to what is really sickening people.  The truth hurts.

March 19, 2008 5:34 AM

fougasseu said:

I worry that Obama made the Jimmy Carter "mistake" of talking to us like adults.

And Obama's speech has curious parallels to Carter's. It was Kennedy who first attacked Jimmy Carter (like Hillary giving campaign lesson to McCain) for saying America was in a "malaise" instead of talking about America's bright future. Reagan jumped on that. The rest is history. A history of sunshine and bullshit from all of our political leaders.

(Reagan set the tone for decades.)

All over Talk Radio they're having a tantrum after being told America is imperfect, we all have flaws, we have work to do, and so on. And to be told all of that by the friend of an America-hating black man! What's this need to be treated like children all about?

March 19, 2008 8:11 AM

s4200 said:

Obama iss not going away easily.

There are enough confused whiners in this country, who will support him.

There are also many decent and educated supporters in his camp, but they are blind to his lack of honor.

Honor can not be generated in one or two generations, even in America.

Howard Dean, John McCain and few others have got the fine ear for honor. Not Obama.

He was a good student, but became only a faint shadow of a real adult.

Obama's words mean very little, and he is listening to his accusers with a tactical answer in his mind ready for counterattack.

March 19, 2008 10:40 AM

ndmackenzie said:

s4200 writes:

-- Honor can not be generated in one or two generations, even in America.

whiskey, tango, foxtrot.

Yeh, honor depends on being able to show all the generations of your ancestry back to someone on the Mayflower.

March 19, 2008 1:16 PM

The Plank said:

We reached out to several friends of the magazine to respond to Obama's big speech in Philadelphia

March 19, 2008 4:32 PM

ironyroad said:

s4200, are you about fifteen years old or something?  This is like the stuff that you cringe at reading when your mom hands over the old notebook she found in the garage.

March 19, 2008 5:39 PM