TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
11.03.2008
Television's "Booby Trap"

An interesting article in yesterday's Times probed the intersection of predation and profit in entertainment. Since the hand-crank days of COPS, Candid Camera, and Temptation Island (even that dreck now seems painfully analog), reality television has gone through an industrial revolution of sorts, producing a robust market for regular people behaving very badly. Some documentary-style contests have been wonderfully meritocratic--the original Iron Chef, the Emmy-winning Amazing Race, and Project Runway come to mind--but these days, most reality shows thrive solely on debasement.

The traffic in shamelessness could cause some tricky math among studio heads. A court ruled last month on the suicide of a man electronically ambushed by television producers and exposed as a pedophile on-air, giving the man's sister standing to sue NBC--to the tune of $100 million. The Times cites the recurring segment as

based on an ugly premise. The show lures people into engaging in loathsome activities. It then teams up with the police to stage a humiliating, televised arrest, while the accused still has the presumption of innocence.

Of course, this particular case (oddly appropriate today) stinks of entrapment--but isn't this the genesis of all reality television? Z-listers offer up their "services" freely, or at least in pursuit of some oversized victory check. Delighted producers discover that the “talent” is increasingly willing to do or say anything (at cost!), inching closer to the conduct described in the NBC lawsuit as

so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.

Kind of like this?

Anyway, the New York judge has opened the door--and payback is a bitch. Here I’m happy to be able to reference Cheaters, potentially the most shameless show on television. The Cheaters host, while exposing one horrified adulterer after another, often exhibited the same smug expression worn by, say, Eliot Spitzer until yesterday morning. When he was stabbed on-air in 2005 by an irate participant (contestant?), it was one hint that even the most debased of the televised hordes may avail themselves of a warm rush of schadenfreude.

--Dayo Olopade

 

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:00 PM with 12 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

jemerk said:

Another rationale for severly limiting tort reform - or not.

March 11, 2008 12:27 PM

Andrew Davis said:

I think a lot of conservatives think that liberals think that this kind of cultural crud is okay.  We need to be clear and loud in our denunciations of the cultural debasement we are witnessing.

Just because its profitable doesn't make it okay.

March 11, 2008 12:28 PM

jkolic said:

I could not agree more with the assertion that reality TV thrives on debasement that helps bring down the already ailing American culture. It does not matter to me whether contestants themselves offer their own dignity up for grabs in return for a hefty payment and passing glory since scenarios seen on countlesss trashy TV shows definitely constitute one example where people need to be saved from themselves, not to even talk about saving the public from having its collective IQ lowered from witnessing the airwaves being glutted with their disgusting behavior.

I would have a lot more respect for the charity work and political viewpoints of Jerry Springer f I did not know he runs one of the most cringe-inducing shows in the history of television. As far as Joey Greco is concerned, I have just as much sympathy for his having been stabbed as I am required to by my sheer humanity. He does, however, richly deserve a bitch-slap and I would in no way be sorry to see someone grace him with one.

I hope payback proves to be a tremendous bitch. Maybe after having its profits drowned in the cost of lawsuit, NBC will think twice before going the vulture route in its quest for viewers.

March 11, 2008 12:51 PM

CharlesFosterKane said:

Andrew,

Yeah, I never got how cultural conservatives associate this kind of crap with the Left. Because of permissiveness? Uh, ok. But the milieu these shows wallow in (kindly described as "white trash") and on the other end, the type of people reaping the profits, hardly fit a "progressive" profile. Not to mention various other contingencies, such as, who are the ones limiting the funding for higher-quality public counterprogramming? Who are the ones fostering a culture and society that puts getting rich, by any means necessary, ahead of all other benchmarks of success? Who are the ones asking the public not to take any responsibility in their country, preferring that they spend, spend, spend, distract themselves endlessly, and let the government take care of public business behind closed doors?

Even making room for their censorious streak, I'd say it's the GOP that could be blamed for fostering trash TV, not the Democrats.

March 11, 2008 1:04 PM

Rhubarbs said:

Actually, we need to make the argument that it is conservative values that encourage this debasing dreck, not liberal values. It's conservatives who encourage the commodification of all aspects of civic life by valuing capital over individuals or society as a whole. Conservatives consistently argue and act against any notion of the common good and frame the individual's role in society as one of passive consumption (even going so far as to replace the word "citizen" with the word "taxpayer" in their vocabulary). "Go shopping," the president said after 9/11. Might as well have said, "Watch some TV."

One of the biggest applause lines when I've seen Obama speak in person has been when he talks about families and education and encourages parents to help their children by turning the TV off. Now, that's not really the proper subject for a presidential platform. But progressives do need to develop some meaningful solutions for helping to transform our culture into one in which the TV _can_ be turned off. I don't know what those solutions are, but I do know they will not come from the conservative ethos of letting profits dictate the limits of our morality.

March 11, 2008 1:11 PM

drdannyu said:

The manner in which American common culture has declined so precipitously in recent years is a genuine cause for concern.  One need look no further than the vogue of Paris Hilton, whose prime claim to fame is her very public fornications, and "starring" in a "reallity" show, in which she evinces sneering disdain for the kinds of lives lived by most Americans.  The willingness of Americans to subject themselves to unbelievable debasement (to say nothing of the unwitting subjects of "To Catch a Predator") in pursuit of "fame," our society's most coveted and fleeting commodity, is astounding.  

Who, for the love of God, goes on national television knowing he or she may be caught in a marriage-destroying lie?  Who are the people who lack either sufficient self-awareness or honest and courageous friends, ending up on the opening weeks of "American Idol"'s new seasons, mocked by the arch and cruel Simon Cowell?  It apparently works well enough for some; eat some kind of invertebrate on national television, and you too might escort George Clooney to the Oscars.  Contemporary reality programming makes Andy Kaufman look like Minnie Pearl.

It's all becoming too much like a certain David Foster Wallace novel.

March 11, 2008 1:44 PM

Andrew Davis said:

Rhubarbs -- Part of the whole Progessive ethos is the creation of voluntary associations such as the YMCA.  I think thats our answer -- get off the couch, go the the Y.

CharlesFosterKane -- Couldn't agree more, but I doubt the Country Club crowd thinks of themselves as morally decadent.

March 11, 2008 1:44 PM

jm_rice said:

Law & Order even had an episode, "Public Service Homicide," which alluded to NBC Dateline's "To Catch a predator".  It was about entrapment that lead to death.  In L&O the producers weren't just sued but prosecuted for manslaughter.  Irony of ironies, L&O is NBC.

Rhubarbs, that's the big problem:  Not just that we should turn off the TV, but how do we get ourselves to turn off the TV?  I guess we should look at addiction pathogy for the answer.

March 11, 2008 2:00 PM

blackton said:

drdannyu, it kind of scares me you know what goes on in Paris's show. Truthfully since I watched Candid Camera as a child I don't think I have ever sat through one reality TV show. Besides spending time watching Spongebob with my kids, there are way too many good shows or movies on TV. I am watching the Nat Geo special now about Jared F. Diamond's Gun, germs, and steel. And I could spend every day watching anything by David Attenborough. There is so much great stuff out there, let the riff raff enjoy their circus.

March 11, 2008 2:00 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Not a chance in hell that our party will make any serious effort -- ie more than a few token lines on the stump about how parents should turn off the TV-- to displace this swill with quality cultural offerings. Two reasons:

First, those offerings require PUBLIC INVESTMENT. Symphonies aren't profitable, never will be. Ditto for quality children's theatre. To ask an increasingly child-phobic public of aging adults to invest in not just kids but kids' cultural offerings takes more courage and imagination than our pale imitation of leadership can summon.

Second, guess what industry is the biggest and most reliable source of funding for the Democrats? Guess what types of shows generate the lions' share of the networks' operating profit?

Neither party is pro-family. They're both up to their elbows in the great American cultural sewer. Neither Tweedledum nor Tweedledee will tell Americans that it's their own crap taste that's to blame here, and that the only way to save them from it is to adopt the elitist, state-subsidized high culture approach that enables vastly poorer countries like Russia to raise millions of their poor citizens with a solid appreciation of Tchaikovsky and Moliere and Mozart.

March 11, 2008 2:42 PM

Rhubarbs said:

Two thoughts.

First off, "reality TV" is actually a European import. Maybe we could get the conservatives to join us in a jingoistic crusade against this un-American invasion from the decadent Europeans? I mean, we're talking about _Dutch_ culture here. What's next, mandatory pot in the schools and a naked, government-licensed hooker on every streetcorner?

Second, I've noticed that you can divide families into two classes: Those with one television set in the house, and those with more than one television set in the house. In families with only one television set, the parents usually control (and limit) television-watching. In families with more than one television set, parents have no effective control over television-watching. (Though I know any number of parents who _think_ they control and limit television-watching in their three-TV households. We should not mistake their delusions for the reality of their situation. One has only to speak to their children for just a few seconds to discover the truth about who is watching what.) Anyway, the point is that if we could only persuade people to limit themselves to a single family TV set, we could make huge strides toward reclaiming control of our national culture.

March 11, 2008 2:51 PM

Andrew Davis said:

This, the American Family:

A T.V. set in the Family Room for watching Dancing With the Stars . . .

A T.V., DVD player, or laptop computer in each bedroom so everyone can hide away and watch porn without anyone else knowing.

USA USA!

March 11, 2008 5:15 PM