TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
27.02.2008
How Hillary Should've Played the SNL Card

I agree with Chait that Hillary made a fool of herself in last night's debate when she cited a Saturday Night Live sketch. But that's just because I think she cited the wrong one. Rather than call attention to the sketch that lampooned the media's love affair with Obama, she should have pointed to an SNL sketch that was actually evidence of that love affair. I'm talking about this sketch from last year:

So, basically, you've got a sketch that portrays Hillary as a witch whose own husband can't stand her . And you've got Obama essentially giving this Hillary caricature his stamp of approval by appearing in the sketch. And, yet, I can't recall anyone in the press criticizing Obama for this. In fact, he was praised for his SNL appearance. You don't have to be Howard Wolfson to think that Hillary could never have gotten away with a similar move--by appearing in an SNL skit that caricatured Obama as, say, a Manchurian candidate. 

Of course, I don't really think Hillary should have tried to reference a months-old SNL bit in last night's debate. That actually would have been worse that what she did do. But I still think it's kind of interesting, in light of the Clinton campaign's constant carping about the press, that no one batted an eye at Obama's SNL appearance. In other words, I think the Clinton people--sour grapes aside--have a bit of a point. 

--Jason Zengerle

Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 3:24 PM with 14 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

CharlesFosterKane said:

In cultural terms, Manchurian candidate does not = witch whose own husband can't stand her. One implicates a single person, the other a whole group of people (Americans of African descent, or who were raised partially in other countries). Rule of comedy is generally that you can be mean, but on an individual basis, rather than in a generalized way. Offend one, not many, unless you're willing to go after everyone (like South Park does).

February 27, 2008 4:05 PM

check said:

her comment was puzzling to my family.  what pillow? was he a child or something we thought.  her mistake was to start out with this as part of her lauded kitchen sink barbs and most of us didnt even understand it.  the next day it was oh yes as we watched the snl outtakes,  that show is so lame.   maybe it appealed to the babysitters on saturday night.  

February 27, 2008 4:11 PM

japsheeh said:

ummm, I don't think so.

February 27, 2008 4:12 PM

ralphnelle said:

I say we let humor be humor. After all, someone here (was it you, Jason?) suggested that the joke of the costume party skit was on Obama, not Clinton, because it was making fun of Obama's narcissism. Moreover, yesterday a talkbacker pointed out that a pre-writers-strike SNL skit, featuring Brian Williams himself, portrayed Hillary as the media favorite.

Obvisouly nothing follows from these skits, certainly not deep truths about the media's bias one way or the other.

New Rule: sometimes a joke is just a joke.

February 27, 2008 4:17 PM

EricWitte said:

What CharlesFosterKane and ralphnelle said.  

And anyway, the best joke of this sketch was at Biden's/Dodd's expense.

February 27, 2008 4:38 PM

WoodyBombay said:

Hillary wasn't the villian in that earlier SNL skit. It doesn't portray her as a witch, it protrays a bunch of jerks (Bill especially) calling her a witch. In fact, the only person who says anything nice to her is ... Barack Obama.

In that skit, she was the victim.

(So she probably approved of it.)

February 27, 2008 5:38 PM

williamyard said:

Is that the one where they put the fish in the blender? That was a good one.

February 27, 2008 5:53 PM

ChanRobt said:

Perhaps you guys have not noticed after sixteen years, but neither of the Clintons has a sense of humor.

They are joke challenged.  Mirthfully tone deaf.

Dead parrots, both of them.

What they do, is like androids:  when they see humans laugh, they laugh, too.  Their timing is so good, they often look like they get it.

February 27, 2008 6:04 PM

cubs08 said:

If Obama's major theatre of operations is somewhere between audacity and hope then Hillary is at the corner of denial and delusional. Painted in a corner, she's lurching. And, like John Kerry (see: swiss cheese on a Philly Cheesesteak) and Mitt Romney (see: small varmints and many other regrettables) and others, her lurches are more marmy and martyr than funny and facile. Where's Lloyd Bensen when you need him: Senator, I've heard Mr. Obama be funny, and Madam, you are no Barack Obama. The distinguished New York Senator should do has her state mates sang years ago and "Slip Slide Away."

February 27, 2008 8:19 PM

Aces Full of Links said:

I enjoyed SNL's return last weekend. If you don't like SNL, you probably wouldn't have liked it, but I thought that the post-strike debut with Tina Fey hosting was contained a satisfying number of laughs. I think Tina Fey is...

February 27, 2008 8:30 PM

asnevitt said:

Okay, I just watched that sketch and I thought it was sympathetic to Hillary Clinton. It portrayed her as being unfairly characterized as a witch by stupid misogynistic white men. And it portrayed Obama as humorless and self-absorbed. At least he recognized her costume for what it was and was a gentleman.

Seems to me that SNL is betraying it's pro-Hillary bias. At least in this latest one they "endorsed" her so that we know where they're coming from.

February 28, 2008 12:15 AM

jet said:

I'm with WoodyBombay and asnevitt on this one.  This sketch is generally sympathetic to Hillary for the reasons both of them cited.

February 28, 2008 12:52 AM

guyminuslife said:

"Perhaps you guys have not noticed after sixteen years, but neither of the Clintons has a sense of humor."

I heard a story from Joe Lockhart on C-SPAN...their former press secretary, so you can't really trust him...but he seemed to say that while Bill is able to deliver a joke and have it be funny, he really *doesn't* have a sense of humor and half the time he doesn't even get the joke. "Is this funny?" he'd ask people after receiving a speech. "Okay, good." Whereas Hillary isn't as funny or charismatic, but will actually laugh at jokes genuinely when the cameras are off. (He claimed that it had saved his ass in a particular PR campaign.) As in, Hillary's a human who comes off as a robot and Bill's a robot who comes off as human.

Again, that's Joe Lockhart and you have to figure he has an angle, and I'm sure he probably didn't want it to come out that way, but to the extent that a former press secretary can be honest, it was very telling.

February 28, 2008 4:25 AM

ChanRobt said:

guyminuslife, that's an interesting insight from an insider, and it sounds credible to me.

One thing for sure, Bill Clinton was no Jack Kennedy.  Eight years in the White House, all those press conferences, and the man never said a witty thing in the entire time.

February 28, 2008 11:20 AM