TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
13.02.2008
You Had Me at "Working Families"

Barack Obama is speaking in Madison, Wisconsin. And one of his first lines was a note of gratitude to the state's Democratic governor, Jim Doyle. Nothing too exciting there, I know, except for the way he introduced Doyle--Obama thanked him for “working tirelessly on behalf of the working families of wisconsin.”

Those of you who have read my comments after earlier primaries know that one of my main concerns with Obama is that he talks too much about his movement--too much about change for change's sake--and too little about concrete issues.  Policy seems like an afterthought, which is fine if you like great oratory (and, to be clear, I do) but not so fine if you want your presidential candidate to start building a mandate for particular reforms.

So while an early shout-out to working families may be boilerplate for most candidates, for Obama it actually has some significance.

Still, let's see how the rest of the speech goes.

Update: Yup, I'm liking this speech.  Lots of talk about standing up for workers, giving them a purpose.  

--Jonathan Cohn 

Posted: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 2:41 AM with 9 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

drdannyu said:

The speech was a marvel.  It was inspiring, and also discussed the hard work that would need to be done.  It was a master at work.

But boy, does McCain sound joyless and small-minded by comparison.

February 12, 2008 10:14 PM

kindlight said:

this speech is transcendent. The reference to the pioneers, talong with the first wave in the civil rights movement. The reference to Exxon profits , without granting it more than a glancing --- and therefore significant --- place. Real Genius. Incredible balance and harmony. Simply put --MAGIC. I go to sleep tonight delighted that I live in these United States.

February 12, 2008 10:17 PM

jmc@420 said:

Maybe its just me, but some of that speech seemed to be a tip of the hat to Edwards...he threw in a line about a steel mill in Chicago which I don't recall hearing previously...

He also, seemingly, brushed aside Hillary and her campaign to assume the mantle of the Dem. nominee.  

Oh, and I totally dug the switch from Obama's speech to McCain's speech.  The visual and oratorical juxtaposition was classic stuff...    

February 12, 2008 10:18 PM

virginiacentrist said:

John McCain said "Fired up and ready to go" at the end of his speech.

"Fired up and ready to die of natural causes" is probably a more appropriate line.

February 12, 2008 10:21 PM

Jonathan Cohn said:

drdannyu-

Yea, no kidding.  What a contrast!  

February 12, 2008 10:26 PM

drwohl said:

JMC--Obama has been using the organizing at steel mills in Chicago trope for quite some time (e.g., when I saw him in Phoenix, at the Virginia J-J dinner).  

February 12, 2008 11:58 PM

Rhubarbs said:

I watched Obama in Richmond on Saturday, in Alexandria on Sunday, and on TV from Madison on Tuesday, and I've heard an impressive development of the same basic speech over just three days. Not exactly as outstanding as Lincoln sharpening his arguments from one Lincoln-Douglas debate to the next, but possibly in the same league. The "fat" of rhetorical flourish -- which I love, by the way -- has been pared way back. Many of his sentences have fewer adjectives, and he's using fewer transitions. He has added specific references to John McCain. Extemporaneous answers from Sunday's Q&A session found their way into his Tuesday night remarks.

Overall he's made a quick transition to a much leaner, faster-paced stump speech that hits harder on policy detail and candidate contrasts without losing any of the sense of elevation and national aspiration. And he delivered at least two of these three speeches without a teleprompter or notes. So we're seeing his mind at work, and it's a truly impressive sight.

February 13, 2008 9:59 AM

cspencef said:

He does sound an awful lot like he's trying to hit certain notes that were part of Edwards's campaign.  Not to say they weren't necessarily there before--I know the shuttered steel mill reference has been in the speech for a while--but perhaps he's forwarding them more, giving more emphasis.  They seem to stand out now.  

It is fascinating to watch his rhetoric evolve, to see more specific policies drop in--the college tuition reference was the first to jump out at me some time last week--and to see how he never fails to remember where he is, whether saluting Doyle or talking trash with the Maryland women's basketball team.  Yeah, it's what a candidate should do, but it's not easy to do, or to make sound natural and organic to the speech.  Public speaking is not at all easy, and he makes it look very natural.  

February 13, 2008 11:49 AM

psantillana said:

Public speaking is incredibly hard.

February 13, 2008 9:27 PM