TNR BLOGS

July 05, 2009 | 4:05 PM
July 05, 2009 | 12:13 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:18 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 05, 2009 | 12:02 PM
July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
07.02.2008
The Future of Mitt Romney

Bidding adieu to ol' Willard, Jon speculates:

In the 1950s and 1960s, George Romney made some his greatest contributions as a private citizen, whether it was rescuing the Detroit schools or rewriting the state constitution.  Mitt has already proven a success in similar endeavors, most famously when he took over the failing 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City.  Now that his presidential campaign is over, perhaps he can return to projects of that sort, where his many talents can be best put to use.

The difference, of course--as Jon knows better than I--is that George Romney never cast away his old, moderate persona the way Mitt Romney has. And, much as I'd like to hold out hope for a reversion to Romney Mark I, I fear his bitter, partisan speech at CPAC today--with its talk of America turning into France and a Democratic victory amounting to a "surrender to terror"--is pretty clear evidence that he still thinks he has a future in the national GOP, and that his problem to date is that he has not committed himself fully enough to his evolution as a shrill, divisive, pandering hack.

--Christopher Orr

Posted: Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:24 PM with 10 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

virginiacentrist said:

I hope Mitt Romney sticks with his new arch-conservative personality. Somebody has to do something about the homosexuals!

February 7, 2008 10:09 PM

fougasseu said:

May he always return, and become the nightmare of the GOP, a well-funded spoiler. Can you imagine, Ralph Nader with a trust fund?

February 7, 2008 10:21 PM

clifton said:

fougassen,

He won't always be a spoiler.  Right now no one thinks he's sincere in his conservatism, but if he keeps it up for 8 years, people will start to believe.  Then he'll have a legitimate chance at the nomination.

February 7, 2008 11:11 PM

Chris Orr said:

But he'll still be a Mormon and--sad to say--it looks like that was what doomed him most with southern conservatives...

February 8, 2008 12:04 AM

CharlesFosterKane said:

Buchanan & others keep talking about him being the "new Reagan", making a big speech at the convention, cementing his position as the darling of conservatives, and waiting in the wins till 2012 when he rides in on a white horse to resurrect the Cause and vanquish Queen Hillary.

Say what you will about Reagan, the man had principles and his appeal was as much about the big ideas of Goldwater conservatism as it was about him. Part of the problem with conservatism today is that they achieved most of the big things Reagan was going for. If Romney's a latter-day Reagan (no pun intended) he has to update the conservative cause for the 21st century, he needs to determine what the components of that cause would be. Ever more tax cuts, substituting "terrorists" for "communists," and continuing to pay lip service to social issues the GOP establishment never honestly gave 2 shits about just won't cut it.

Besides the obvious fact that Romney has NO history as a conservative spokesman the way Reagan did...until he ran for president, he was the personification of the Rockefeller Republican, the kind my old home-state rag the Union Leader used to illustrate as a Rhino in editorial cartoons (get it...RINO...Republican in Name Only...) What a joke.

February 8, 2008 12:55 AM

guyminuslife said:

One wonders what would have happened if he had decided to go the other way and rebranded himself as the "liberal Democrat."

"You know, I became disillusioned with the Republican party and I started buying organic vegetables from a farmer's market. And I started believing in equal rights for everyone regardless of whether they're terrorists or they've committed crimes. That's the great thing about America---you never have to walk far to find a Starbucks with a soymilk latte where you can discuss solar energy with Buddhist yoga instructors."

February 8, 2008 3:30 AM

Robert Powell said:

Nonsense, Chris. Given the choice between a typical slick, shape-changing Yankee talking out of both sides of his mouth, and a Baptist preacher from Arkansas with a ten-year record of conservative governance, the South did the right thing. You think it's because he was a Mormon? Please.

February 8, 2008 5:38 AM

butchie b said:

True, Robert, but give him a few more years of burnishing those conservative credentials, and people will forget about his "Massachusetts period."

Trouble is, he'll still be a Mormon.  That may still play, hard to say.  And Huckabee is a populist, which is slightly different from conservative when it comes to economics.

February 8, 2008 11:09 AM

ironyroad said:

Agree enthusiastically with guyminuslife above:  Dude, you got it!  That's the real danger to watch out for --  Mitt entering the race for the Democratic nomination in 2012!

February 8, 2008 11:54 AM

cspencef said:

Off-the-wall prediction: Mitt gets a show on Fox News.

February 8, 2008 5:06 PM