TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM
July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
28.01.2008
Romney After Florida: He'll Keep On Rollin' Along

So, Mitt Romney might not win Florida tomorrow. It's being suggested that, if McCain wins, Romney is finally cooked. But I don't think this is true. Romney is the evil* Energizer Bunny that will just keep robotically rolling forward, methodically and relentlessly picking up delegates, even after it looks like he should be crushed for good. The tortoise in this classic Tom Toles cartoon? Should be labelled "Romney."

Today he released his official support committee for Virginia, a state that votes on February 12. It's a smart addition to his potentially genius delegate-amassing project.

The Romney endorsers make up quite a "substantial list" that heavily represents the "very conservative element of the [state] party," as a friend of mine in Virginia GOP politics puts it. And it's a list that boasts big-name activists in the state's hottest electoral topic of late: immigration. Romney co-chair Corey Stewart is the infamous county pol who pushed through one of the most extreme resolutions to deny services to undocumented immigrants in the country. Delegate Jackson Miller, another Romney co-chair, designed the Virginia bill to strip charities like the Salvation Army of funds unless they verified they were not providing services to illegal immigrants. Bob FitzSimmonds, a Romney Steering Committee member, made a name for himself by running for state Senate last year on a hard-line immigration stance.

It's easy to say endorsements like this don't matter. But in a state like Virginia that's not used to making any difference in presidential primaries, it's the hardcore conservatives and dedicated activists that are more used to voting -- people Stewart, Miller, and FitzSimmonds can probably turn out handily.

And at the micro level, I think these kinds of endorsements do matter. Look at South Carolina. Romney lost. It seemed like the big-name endorsements he got in S.C. -- say, Bob Jones III -- made no difference for him. But look at the 27th precinct in Greenville County, the precinct directly serving Bob Jones University. Romney got 29% there compared to only 17% in the county as a whole. It's hard not to conclude BJ3's endorsement did make a difference at ground zero.

Picking up a lot of very conservative, activist-y endorsements throughout Virginia -- to create as many of these little "ground zeroes" as possible -- strikes me as a good strategy.

* Evil as in can't be turned off, like in a science fiction movie. I actually share Jon's sympathy toward Romney.

-- Eve Fairbanks

Posted: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:32 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

cspencef said:

Is there any particular reason for the first sentence--some new poll or bit of research which suggests that where Floridians are concerned, Mitt isn't it?  Or just a nice rhetorical grabber to draw attention?

For now I'll take Dave Barry's "analysis" of the Florida primary:

www.miamiherald.com/.../395207.html

Best line:  "Bringing up the rear is Rudy, who needs a win and has been frantically courting Florida voters. He's mowing your lawn right now."

January 28, 2008 5:41 PM

primwallflow said:

"Classic" cartoon? It's not even a week old!

January 28, 2008 5:47 PM

Rhubarbs said:

Here's what I wonder. The Virginia GOP's conservative activists decided last year not to let primary voters have a say in the nomination of a successor to retiring Senator John Warner. The Gilmore crowd feared that moderate Republicans and independents in Tidewater and Northern Virginia might once again force the GOP to nominate a center-right candidate who could win in November instead of Gilmore.

So the really interesting local race, the one in which the people Romney is trying to reach have the most at stake, isn't on the Feb. 12 ballot. How does that affect his ability to translate activist endorsements into primary votes?

(I should say that the chatter I hear among gun owners in Virginia regards Romney and Giuliani as barely more tolerable than Hillary -- and rural gun voters play a big role in Virgnia's conservative activist community. Crossover appeal to rural sportsmen has been key to most recent successful Virginia Democrats; how does a Republican win a primary without them?)

January 28, 2008 6:01 PM

lymon1 said:

Complete tangent: George Allen Jr. must be kicking himself watching this race -- he could have run away with the GOP nomination it if he hadn't been such an idiot.  

January 28, 2008 6:12 PM

drdannyu said:

Well, endorsements like these matter for a different reason.  They come from people who are advocating ugly, xenophobic policy.  Yes, yes...illegal immigration is going to topple American society, or something.  Whatever.  A policy that penalizes charities for failing to turn away illegal immigrants in need is depraved, and anyone who flaunts his association with people who would advocate such a policy is utterly unqualified to be president in my estimation.

But then, I would never have voted for him anyhow.

January 28, 2008 6:28 PM

williamyard said:

You know those Kinoki Detox Foot Pads advertised hither and yon on the tube?  The ones that you stick to your feet before you go to bed, and in the morning they've turned black and are filled with "toxins" and "parasites" and what not?

I'm thinking that if we put some on Romney, the next morning there'd be all kinds of junk on them: sandwiches, faded Polaroids, lag bolts, tadpoles, linseed oil putty, and so forth.

I bet that lost trunk key from my old '64 Fairlane would turn up.

January 28, 2008 6:29 PM