TNR BLOGS

January 09, 2009 | 9:00 AM
January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:50 PM
January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
24.01.2008
Farewell, Kucinich

He's out. Formal speech to come tomorrow. And I have to see this as a shame; based on all the (dubious) candidate-matching rubrics available online, here was the man for me: A committed, principled progressive, a 6-term representative who needed to apologize for none of his votes on the trail, and--at least until Mike Gravel cherry-picked his role as the righteous, wacky outsider--a leftward force in the dialogue. 

I will add that at the TNR offices there is a large reprint of the helpful New York Times chart of candidate stances on major issues. We've been X-ing their bright and shiny faces out as events warrant. But on the democratic side, it seems layout concerns (and a latent media bias?) left room for only six candidates, which, sadly, didn't include Dennis the Menace. A theoretical X then, for an improbable run.

Update: Thumbs down to Kucinich's pro-Serb, pro-life stance in early incarnations of his ideology. Thumbs up to commenters for pointing this out! Our democracy must be alive and well.

--Dayo Olopade

Posted: Thursday, January 24, 2008 9:44 PM with 13 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

teplukhin2you said:

So long. Could you leave your wife behind? For photo-ops with the saucer, anyway?

January 24, 2008 5:16 PM

stanmvp48 said:

"here was the man for me: A committed, principled progressive, a 6-term representative who needed to apologize for none of his vote"

I assume this post was a joke as was the above quoted comment.  How about his votes against abortion for his entire career.  How about his vote against any resolution criticizing and Arab state or Iran for anything.  How about his support for Serbia.  How about his determination that every American be required to buy every piece of garbage produced by Detroit for whatever price they could get away with.  What was progressive about this ludicrous little man?

January 24, 2008 5:17 PM

bcbaird said:

There was certainly nothing progressive about his haircut.

January 24, 2008 5:37 PM

boneill said:

I am with you, tep.  I am not well-brushed on my Nordic mythology, but it isn't often an elf gets to wed a Valkeryie.  Well done, Dennis!

January 24, 2008 5:37 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Hi hairline was progressive. Downward, over his face.

January 24, 2008 5:42 PM

rozenson said:

Awww, now I have to vote for a REAL candidate . . .

January 24, 2008 5:45 PM

drdannyu said:

Everything I have ever heard about his economic ideas struck me as absurd.  (Did he really say that the American government should guarantee employment for all well-educated Americans?)

Well, this should change precisely nothing.

January 24, 2008 5:47 PM

boneill said:

But which candidate will pick up his vote?

January 24, 2008 6:00 PM

jhildner said:

He seems like a nice enough guy, but I would be very worried about his foreign policy.  I hated the Iraq war, and still do, but I distrust peaceniks -- ideologues who strain to suggest that peace is always the answer.  It's not, and that's a dangerous way to think.  It's dumb to be for dumb wars, but it's also dumb to be against all wars, and K-Nich struck me as the latter kind of dumb.

January 24, 2008 6:15 PM

norval13 said:

Gee, does this mean he'll actually have to go back to being a congressman now?  The people of Cleveland should now demand a little work out of him now, however unglamorous . . .

January 24, 2008 6:17 PM

Lundell said:

I'm guessing he's the favorite for Secretary of Extraterrestrial Affairs.

January 24, 2008 6:43 PM

porkido said:

Kucinich was a force in the dialogue?  Which dialogue?

January 24, 2008 7:17 PM

amidut said:

Kucinich was the only candidate to advocate true universal health insurance, i.e. extending Medicare to all. The other candidates just tap dance around what must be done.

January 24, 2008 9:35 PM