TNR BLOGS

September 07, 2008 | 2:54 PM
September 06, 2008 | 4:31 PM
September 06, 2008 | 3:43 PM

September 05, 2008 | 2:53 PM
September 05, 2008 | 3:45 AM
September 05, 2008 | 12:25 AM

September 06, 2008 | 5:57 PM
September 06, 2008 | 5:54 PM
September 06, 2008 | 3:14 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

September 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
September 03, 2008 | 1:01 PM
September 02, 2008 | 6:20 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
21.01.2008
Freedom's Watch Gets Busy

The Washington Post reports that Freedom's Watch—the new conservative non-profit funded by billionaire Sheldon Adelson—could spend as much as $250 million in the 2008 elections. (To put that in context, MoveOn spent just $21 million in 2004.) And the group's already making a splash:

Adelson personally wrote an $80,000 check to Freedom's Watch on Dec. 7, according to Federal Election Commission documents, just four days before the election that gave Republican Robert Latta the House seat representing the district around Bowling Green. Behind a blood-red foreground, the group's ad showed Latinos hurrying under fences and being frisked by police as a narrator accused Democratic candidate Robin Weirauch and "liberals in Congress" of supporting free health care for illegal immigrants. ...

Democrats are particularly concerned about the impact these groups can have against vulnerable incumbents from rural districts, where TV advertising is less expensive. "Those are congressional districts where a little bit of money can go a long way," Van Hollen said.

As an appetizer, Freedom's Watch took out full-page ads last fall in the local newspapers of seven freshman House Democrats from rural districts, targeting their antiwar votes and linking them to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

So far the DCCC has been out-raising its Republican counterpart by a wide margin—$31 million vs. $2.3 million—but Freedom's Watch could swamp that advantage easily. By the way, the latest issue of Mother Jones has a short-but-colorful profile of Adelson that, if anything, understates how Ahab-esque the guy is—especially his obsession with attacking labor unions (among other things, he once took a case all the way to the Supreme Court, trying to argue that sidewalks were private property, just so he could charge union picketers with trespassing).

--Bradford Plumer

Posted: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:53 PM with 7 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Bukharin said:

Couple this "Freedom Watch" rubbish with the free air-time Fox will provide, then one can see the general election is far from a cake-walk for any Democratic candidate.

January 21, 2008 3:20 PM

The Ignorant Populist said:

What an obnoxious prick.

January 21, 2008 4:03 PM

achester99 said:

Adelson also does a lot of good, so I'm sort of torn.

Just cuz you don't like someone's politics doesn't make him a prick.

January 21, 2008 4:08 PM

Brad Plumer said:

Well, I'm not fond his monomaniacal obsession with union-busting (or any of his other positions), but whether one agrees or not, his tenacity is remarkable. Not the sort of guy I'd ever want to clash with.

January 21, 2008 4:28 PM

The Ignorant Populist said:

Trying to privatise public space to stop legal pickets?

An obnoxious prick.

January 21, 2008 5:36 PM

Bukharin said:

Brad Plumer said:

his tenacity is pretty remarkable. Not the sort of guy I'd ever want to clash with.

So it goes.  And well said.  Just the same Adelson is on the side of fear mongering @ immigration, et. al.  and disinformation @ economics., et. al.  It’s my hunch Bush, Rove & Co. have exceedingly overplayed their (very) partisan hand...  This notion of (from the Mother Jones profile) a “never-ending-campaign” is precisley which has led to Bushes well deserved undoing.  That is the politicizing of EVERYTHING.  Ergo it won’t be easy.  Nevertheless, information - sound, critical and well played out analysis - will be the end of these cretins.

January 21, 2008 5:59 PM

blackton said:

on a more somber note, he is pretty old and this is probably one of the last Presidential elections he can mess around with. He might swing a few congressional races but nowhere near enough, the fundamentals for the house and senate look way too weak for republicans. He has his work cut out for him, it will take some savvy marketing to convince people who might lose their house, or have seen their home price plummet that the Republicans who created the mess can divert people from this issue by talking about Iran.

January 21, 2008 6:23 PM