TNR BLOGS

November 20, 2008 | 12:55 PM
November 20, 2008 | 11:23 AM
November 20, 2008 | 10:57 AM

November 20, 2008 | 1:06 PM
November 20, 2008 | 12:03 PM
November 20, 2008 | 10:45 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

November 20, 2008 | 11:06 AM
November 19, 2008 | 3:17 PM
November 19, 2008 | 2:17 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
15.01.2008
Bob Johnson Isn't Making Sense

Bob Johnson gives an interview to the WaPo in which he offers his further deep thoughts on Obama and race:

"We've always said we need a perfect, well-spoken, Harvard-educated black candidate who would prove we've transcended race," the billionaire African American businessman and supporter of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) said in an interview yesterday. "Well, now we've got him and nobody knows how to campaign against him."

Except, of course, by insinuating that he was a crackhead. 

"What has happened, in my opinion, is that what we have created is the quote-unquote 'perfect candidate' that's like in the movies, that has absolutely no blemishes," a vision that is unrealistic, said Johnson, who started Black Entertainment Television and has been a friend of the Clintons for two decades.

Which is why he needed to allude to the drugs--because nobody's perfect. 

He said Obama has avoided talking about race, a tactic that Johnson said made him acceptable to the largely white electorate of Iowa. Obama won the state's Democratic caucuses on Jan. 3. "White America is saying, 'He's safe for us, he should be safe for you guys,' " Johnson said, referring to blacks. "We're letting other people pick our leaders."

Because Obama isn't running for President of the United States, just President of Black America. 

"The Obama campaign -- win, lose or draw -- is going to have to address race," Johnson said. "If we don't have this debate about race within the Democratic Party . . . we could find ourselves with a division in this party as we go up against whoever the Republicans put up."

Because there's a lot of latent African-American support out there for McCain or Romney.

--Jason Zengerle 

Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:06 AM with 13 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

blackton said:

how can such a stupid man become a billionaire and why can't I be stupid in that same way? yeah, lets have both a racial and sexual debate within the party, let us rip ourselves to shreds completely alienating each others supporters because that will help the Democrats win. Will someone somewhere put me in a coma until after the election is over?

January 15, 2008 11:00 AM

Eos said:

NOTHING the Clintons have said is remotely racist. What they are doing is attacking Obama and defending themselves. THAT IS NOT RACIST. It is legitimate political conflict. Obama's drug use is fair game, just as Bill Clinton's marijuana use was fair game. You may remmember that cocaine use was also raised against George Bush.

There is an attempt by Obama's campaign to get us to a point where any criticism of Obama is seen as morally illegitimate. What Obama supporters had best realize is that the nation will never vote for a candidate to whom the electorate can't speak openly and freely. Nor should they in a democracy. If people are afraid to voice their thoughts and feelings and intuitions because they fear being accused of racism, based on a standard of racism that no one can understand or anticipate (e.g., Biden being snickered at for racism by Robinson and others for calling Obama "articulate"), then they will choose not to vote for that person about whom they can't speak freely. And they will be absolutely right in making that choice.

January 15, 2008 11:01 AM

drdannyu said:

Well, to hear Andrew Sullivan tell it, if Clinton is the nominee, we can expect a huge groundswell of support from the black community for Huckabee.

andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/.../clinton-loses-a.html

Not that Sully is...how shall one say this...particularly rational on the subject of the Clintons.

January 15, 2008 11:06 AM

Androscoggin said:

Let me see if I've got this right:

Ostensibly Johnson would like to see a black president. But he doesn't seem to want a black president who doesn't place race at the center of his campaign. Of course, any black candidate who places race at the center of his campaign is going to fare poorly in a national election, which makes sense given that we as a country face many problems that aren't related to race at all. So although Johnson would ideally like to see a successful black presidential candidate, in practice he would actually prefer a suitable white candidate to a highly-qualified black candidate with the ability to appeal to voters of all races. Bizarre.

January 15, 2008 11:22 AM

dbhuff said:

Once again, the headline is not news...

Johnson is as much a racist as someone who would never see a black man in office, because for him the issue IS race.  

"Because Obama isn't running for President of the United States, just President of Black America. "

--well said.

January 15, 2008 12:10 PM

ChanRobt said:

The Democrats have been playing the racial and gender identity cards for close to 40 years.  Now they're paying for it.

You have a worthy black candidate who had stayed above the race thing.  Until the going got tough, and now he (through surrogates) is descending into it.

You're got a female candidate (not so worthy) who has pretended all along to be run on her own merits.  

But, of course, she was always riding on her husband's coattails.  And now that the going gets tough for her, she's playing the race card in the negative.  

My Democratic friends, don't act so damn surprised at the blowback.  You have been baiting the race and gender traps for decades.  Now they're snapping shut on you.

If the Democrats manage once again to seize defeat from the jaws of victory this year, race and gender political manipulation will be the reason for it.

January 15, 2008 12:48 PM

ChanRobt said:

TYPOS CORRECTED

The Democrats have been playing the racial and gender identity cards for close to 40 years.  Now they're paying for it.

You have a worthy black candidate who had stayed above the race thing.  Until the going got tough, and now he (through surrogates) is descending into it.

You're got a female candidate (not so worthy) who has pretended all along to be running on her own merits.  

But, of course, she was always riding on her husband's coattails.  And now that the going gets tough for her, she's playing the race card in the negative.  

My Democratic friends, don't act so damn surprised at the blowback.  You have been baiting the race and gender traps for decades.  Now they're snapping shut on you.

If the Democrats manage once again to seize defeat from the jaws of victory this year, race and gender political manipulation will be the reason for it.

January 15, 2008 12:53 PM

ChanRobt said:

Well, there was still (frustratingly) a typo in the above.

I'll just have to live with it.

January 15, 2008 12:56 PM

ChanRobt said:

Well, there was still (frustratingly) a typo in the above.

I'll just have to live with it.

January 15, 2008 12:58 PM

blackton said:

channy, Obama did not comment on Hillarys stupid comment on MLK and LBJ, others did, and people who have have not even endorsed him, like Donna Brazile. As I said in other posts, Hillary could have made the same point saying that Susan B. Anthony and the suffragists did great work, but it took Woodrow Wilson and Congress to pass the 19th amendment. Doing so would have not offended anyone, but she chose to use MLK and has to answer why. Hillary is practicing a scorched earth policy to secure the nomination, and I refuse to vote for her because of it.

January 15, 2008 1:22 PM

psantillana said:

So is nobody in the kiss-ass press going to ask Johnson about the "community organizer" lie? To me that was the most offensive part. And the Clinton campaign issued the statement, proving yet again that they're LYING SACKS OF SH*T.

January 15, 2008 3:02 PM

drdannyu said:

*sigh*  I DO have to admit that the Clinton campaign has been behaving in a really unseemly manner, and I'm feeling less good about the possibility of supporting her (if it comes to that) in November.

That being said, Chan my man, the GOP is hardly free of issues related to various bits of its base having at one another over ideological issues.  Try to convince me that every single one of the major GOP candidates isn't flawed to some significant part of the base.  Please.  Every single one is an apostate from some perspective or another.  So, while this internecine "he implied, she implied" crap is utterly tiresome, I don't see the GOP sailing on smooth waters just now, either.

January 15, 2008 3:26 PM

cspencef said:

Bob Johnson, Bob Johnson...oh yeah, he's the guy who named a crappy NBA team after himself.

I'm supposed to take him seriously ... why?  Becuz he's rich?

Oh, never mind...

January 15, 2008 11:35 PM