TNR BLOGS

November 20, 2008 | 3:55 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:45 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:06 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

November 20, 2008 | 2:15 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:52 PM
November 20, 2008 | 11:06 AM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
07.01.2008
Why Does the Media Love McCain?

Commenting on my McCain post, WoodyBombay talks back:

Did media members hoist him on their shoulders and carry him out of the room like he was Vince Lombardi?

It’s a fair question, although, for the record, the answer in this particular instance is no: McCain exited the town hall on his own two feet. Still, there’s no denying that the media absolutely loves McCain, and I’d imagine many readers wonder why that is.

The simple explanation is: McCain affords the press access like no other candidate. In the McCain campaign, there’s no barrier between candidate and reporter. If you have a question for McCain, you don’t have to bother going to his press secretary; you simply go ask him. On some days, you literally spend eight hours with the candidate, just riding with him in the back of his bus peppering him with questions on everything from Pakistan to his philosophical thoughts about suicide. Toward the end of the day, this amount of unfettered access to the candidate can actually be a bit of a problem, when you start to run out of questions for him and there are awkward silences. But, on the whole, it’s hard to overstate the sort of goodwill this access engenders among reporters.

Still, I do wonder why McCain allows this sort of access, given all the risks it entails. Today, on the ride from Salem to Nashua, a reporter basically asked McCain that question, and I thought his answer was fairly telling. McCain said:

Because we’ve always done it. And if I had stopped it, we would get crucified. I enjoy it. Believe it or not, I enjoy it. I enjoy the back and forth. We can fully explore issues that way. I’m not going to be standing up in a room just giving five- and ten-second answers. . . . I really believe that presidents run into difficulties when they don’t communicate all the time with the American people, and I believe that the media is obviously a prime way of doing that. . . . And also I learn, these questions make me think. . . . I think it’s intellectually stimulating to me.

I’d imagine there’s some truth in the second part of that answer and McCain wasn’t just flattering his interlocutors about how they stimulate him. But I also think that the first part of the answer—that McCain would be crucified if he suddenly cut off access, as, in fact, he sort of was back when he was the frontrunner and was running an incumbent’s campaign with a more buttondown approach to media relations—may be more true. In a way, McCain may be trapped in his love affair with the media.

P.S. Speaking of McCain and the media, I was at a dinner tonight with various political reporters who are up here to cover the happenings, and it was pretty funny how giddy/relieved they were at the prospect of a McCain-Obama general election campaign, as opposed to, say, a Romney-Clinton one. Suddenly, the next 11 months of their lives look a whole lot more enjoyable.

P.P.S. With all of the love between the media and McCain, I do sometimes wonder if voters feel like a third wheel. At yesterday's packed town hall in Salem, which was in a middle school gym, I witnessed several confrontations between voters sitting in folding chairs on the floor and the reporters who were standing in the aisles blocking their views. In one such showdown, a 50-something white guy (whose face could appear next to the word "flinty" in the dictionary) gave Robert Novak a good shove in the back to move him out of his way. Novak turned around and leaned over to say something to the guy, but, before things could escalate, a heads-up McCain aide scurried over and quickly found a seat for the prince of darkness in another part of the gym.

--Jason Zengerle

Posted: Monday, January 07, 2008 5:27 AM with 25 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

teplukhin2you said:

For the same reasons that smart-pants undergrads love the hip and irreverent professor whose door's always open: he makes them feel daring and cool. and he gives them a level of access that the other candidates don't.

January 7, 2008 1:33 AM

ZACummings said:

The righteous part of me screams to journalists like Jason "Where's your professionalism? Where's your objectivity?" But as a young journalist-in-training, I can empathize with Jason, etc. on this score. It's not so much that journalists give the McCains and Obamas positive coverage in return for their candor. The candor leads to a sense of trust, which in turn leads to a glowing report. I'm not saying it's right or professional, but I think it's important the media point out which candidates are cooperative and which aren't. It lets the regular Joes know what kind of communicator and team leader a candidate is.

On a related note, it's encouraging to see media-friendly candidates surging in the polls. Hopefully future political candidates take notice of the rewards.

January 7, 2008 1:35 AM

teplukhin2you said:

Plus, McCain's _funny_ and fun to be around. World-class teaser, japester.

January 7, 2008 4:36 AM

dbhuff said:

Reminds me that people worried about the objectivity of embedded reporters in Iraq, are these guys 'embedded' with McCain?

January 7, 2008 8:52 AM

dbhuff said:

Not to say I don't love the comment about Presidents need to communicate, especially with the nearly complete lack of pressers with the current President...

January 7, 2008 8:53 AM

jacksondyer said:

"P.P.S. With all of the love between the media and McCain, I do sometimes wonder if voters feel like a third wheel."

You meant "With all of the love between the media and Obama, I do sometimes wonder if voters feel like a third wheel" didn't you?

January 7, 2008 9:13 AM

drdannyu said:

Being that "McCain" and "Obama" are spelled and pronounced totally differently, I imagine that Jay-Z (sorry, Jason, but it seems like a good nickname to me) meant "McCain."

January 7, 2008 9:37 AM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

Jason,

Yes, the open access could very well be the reason for McCain's popularity among journalists. I do however, have another suggestion: Most journalists I have met - you being the exception of course - are incredibly geeky dweebs who are just putty in the hands of a guy like McCain. McCain, even in his present mummified condition, is a He Man and the kind of guy - strong, manly, mean, courageous, strictly missionary protocols - that your typical journalist, as he picked up towels and carried buckets on the sidelines while a decidedly younger iteration of McCain ran towards the goal lines, dreamt about becoming.

And even politicians of this stripe  - Joementum being a classic example - fall in man love with McCain.

It is one of his greatest assets I think...getting this kinds of dreamy, no varsity sweater but tops in the class kinds of boys to carrying his shoes....

January 7, 2008 9:44 AM

Robert Powell said:

Media love is unreliable. I think it's pretty clear that it is currently being applied to both McCain and Obama, if for different reasons. In a pick-up at the bar sort of way, it's based on the same dynamic.

Voters who watch the process with bemusement, though more understanding than the elites of the politico-media class imagine about humans like Huckabee. McCain, and Obama, are not third wheels, but score-keepers.  We award the only points that count.

January 7, 2008 9:53 AM

jacksondyer said:

"Being that "McCain" and "Obama" are spelled and pronounced totally differently, I imagine that Jay-Z (sorry, Jason, but it seems like a good nickname to me) meant "McCain.""

If he didn't he should have since the flirtations between the press and McCain are not compared to the media's embrace of Obama.

The former is a family movie, the latter an X rated flick.

January 7, 2008 9:59 AM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

hee,hee...

that's pretty good jack...and you're right.

January 7, 2008 10:05 AM

mmathog said:

Yeah 'sex and violence' is what these things seem to come down to.

Would be nice for more direct focus on what say, McCain would actually do as President.

January 7, 2008 12:15 PM

boneill said:

On the flip side, the way reporters act toward the candidates are probably kind of similar to how we would relate to the candidates, which, while not of prime importance, isn't totally irrelevant either.  

But, regardless: everyone is missing the really important part of this piece.  Some guy was going to kick Robert Novak's ass.  Why didn't that happen?

January 7, 2008 12:52 PM

jacksondyer said:

mmathog said: "Would be nice for more direct focus on what say, McCain would actually do as President."

As opposed to the clear detaiiled program Obama has laid out? Where can I read about it?

January 7, 2008 1:18 PM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

bone,

that was an interesting sidebar. Did you hear that one of Obama's body guards - a strapping brute listed as 6' 8" and about 275 - nearly got into it with Bill O'Reilly?  The Factless reportedly grabbed him and the body guard nearly went after him. Now, that is my idea of important.

January 7, 2008 1:19 PM

TimSlavin said:

These political reporters should look up Stockholm Syndrome. More to the point, if these journalists don't like covering anyone but McCain and Obama, what prevents them from getting another beat? I'm surprised their editors have not reassigned them or fired them.

This matters, of course, because of the destruction wreaked by the last media darling during an election, George Bush. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people are dead and have had their lives destroyed in part because of the media swooning over Bush, not once but twice. Hey, he's a regular guy, what harm could he do? If you want closer to home, how about illegal spying prior to 9/11? Or the federal response to Hurricane Katrina (plenty of Section 8 housing for those affected but instead they line the pockets of their contributors by buying thousands of mobile homes). How about locking up Americans without trial for years, torture, no lawyers?

I'll give you credit Jason for at least being honest enough to provide this context. I'm saddened that the media is so biased and that it has a destructive effect. And no one cares, not least the journalists who apparently think only of themselves and their careers, not voters or people impacted by the policies of the people the media effectively elects by cutting off (or skewing) coverage of other candidates.

January 7, 2008 1:21 PM

teplukhin2you said:

One more thing: irony being the intellectual man's revenge on politics, journos love irony in a politician more than righteousness or earnest passion or any other attribute. They'll prefer a Eugene McCarthy to a Nader type any day, even if their natural instincts line up with the crusader, because the journalist's first priority is to be skeptical, cool, disdainful of bullsh*t in all its nefarious guises.

When McCain does his Straight Talk routine, he's as Cookie/JB would say the coolest kid in the class. I'd argue that a large part of Obama's appeal is his projection of a JFK-style cool that makes journos think that underneath the tie and jacket he too is a skeptical, ironic intellectual.

January 7, 2008 1:37 PM

thejauntyboulevardier said:

Does anyone else find McCain's use of "my friends" to be annoying, especially when he is addressing someone like Romney, who is decidedly not his friend...

January 7, 2008 3:53 PM

teplukhin2you said:

Maybe it's just an old white sunbelt male's way of dissing someone. Shades of Perot. "Mah friends, time is not on our side. Mah friends, time is big 'n' mean 'n' ugly and is gonna chew yore ass up and spit it out like a peach pit!"

/ dana carvey voice

January 7, 2008 4:58 PM

williamyard said:

I saw a bit of McCain being interviewed by Tim Russert yesterday, and it totally creeped me out.

Russert was saying something along the lines of "Look, Senator, you talk about how foreign policy experience is necessary, but Reagan and Clinton and [insert name here] didn't have any experience and they figured things out..." and before McCain responded his eyes flashed at Russert in this Hannibal Lector-like glare, just for a split second. It reminded me of that old Roman Polanski film "The Tenant," where Polanski also plays the protagonist, who is the only one who sees the split-second snake tongues flicking out from the mouths of his friends and neighbors as they bend over him after he's fallen through a skylight.

I've seen this flash in McCain's eyes before. In contrast, his "straight talk" seems almost pathological.

Not that he is any worse than any of the others, on either side.  There are many choices this incumbent-less time around, and we so want them to be good choices, but the older I get the more they come down to men and women not so different from the rest of us except wielding a hell of a lot of power, and that so often works out not so well for plenty of folks bereft of lawyers, guns, and money, sea to shining sea and beyond, everyone's best intentions be damned.

January 7, 2008 6:18 PM

jacksondyer said:

"... and before McCain responded his eyes flashed at Russert in this Hannibal Lector-like glare, just for a split second. "

First we had Hillary as Medusa and now McCain as Hannibal Lector.

You guys need to get out more.

You have obviously been watching too many movies.

January 7, 2008 8:00 PM

williamyard said:

True, jackson. However, I did watch a high-def "Yule Log" for a couple days, just to settle down some (my cable provider offered it all last week!).

January 7, 2008 8:52 PM

The Plank said:

A couple of days ago, a few of us here were trying to figure out just how McCain came back from the dead

January 30, 2008 10:50 AM

The Plank said:

As someone who freely acknowledges the media's love for John McCain, let me say that I think it's

February 5, 2008 2:27 PM

The Plank said:

Once upon a time, John McCain flattered political reporters for "intellectually stimulating"

August 28, 2008 10:59 AM