TNR BLOGS

January 08, 2009 | 8:20 PM
January 08, 2009 | 8:00 PM
January 08, 2009 | 6:03 PM

January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:13 PM
January 07, 2009 | 9:41 AM

January 08, 2009 | 6:31 PM
January 08, 2009 | 4:13 PM
January 08, 2009 | 2:50 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

January 08, 2009 | 5:12 PM
January 08, 2009 | 3:25 PM
January 08, 2009 | 1:16 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
06.01.2008
McCain Keeps His Cool

Somewhere On the Road Between Salem and Nashua, New Hampshire--John McCain was drinking a cup of coffee. This wouldn’t normally be all that noteworthy; McCain, after all, drinks a lot of coffee. But he was drinking this particular cup in the back of his campaign bus on Sunday afternoon, with just hours to go until he participated in the final GOP debate before the New Hampshire Primary. That made it an unusual cup of Joe.

 

You see, after stumbling badly in the first few debates of the ’08 campaign, McCain came up with a couple of new debate-day rules. Rule Number One: always do a town hall meeting on the day of a debate in order to loosen up; he’d just done one in front of an SRO crowd at a middle school in Salem, so he was okay on that score. Rule Number Two: don’t drink coffee on the afternoon of a debate, because it makes him edgy, jumpy, or, as he put it in a conversation a few weeks ago, when he has “four cups of coffee before a debate, I go out there and I’m like, Argh! Argh! Argh!’” And yet, here McCain was, sipping from his paper cup of Dunkin Donuts’ finest and flagrantly flouting one of the rules that have carried him to the precipice of a remarkable political comeback.

 

That’s just how confident McCain is at the moment.

 

McCain’s carefree attitude toward caffeine is particularly interesting because, in a way, the biggest obstacle he faces in New Hampshire right now—and maybe in the entire race—is staying on an even keel. For the past few weeks, ever since McCain started rising in the polls here, Mitt Romney’s campaign has seemingly been going out of its way to try to make him angry—whether it’s mailers that misrepresent McCain’s views on immigration or press releases that make an issue out of McCain’s temper. The Romney campaign has even gone so far as to compile “A Top 10 List” of the times McCain has attacked Republicans. (Number 8: “Sen. McCain Repeatedly Called Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) An “A**hole”.) If McCain didn’t like Romney before, he loathes him now.

 

But McCain has had to keep those feelings in check. One of the big lessons he and his advisors took away from the 2000 campaign was that, when McCain lost his cool in the face of the Bush campaign’s attacks on him in South Carolina and lashed back, running an ad that compared Bush to Bill Clinton (which, incidentally, is number 9 on that Romney campaign Top 10 list), he only hurt himself. “The lesson was, just run your game, communicate your message,” McCain’s longtime aide Mark Salter explained to me.

 

And so that’s what McCain’s trying to do. On the bus, he repeatedly refused to take the bait when reporters attempted to goad him into saying something nasty about Romney. “I’m going to respect my opponents,” he said, before taking an indirect shot by mentioning how much he respected Mike Huckabee and Rudy Giuliani. And when McCain has gone after Romney directly, he’s made sure to do so with a smile. In the Saturday night debate, he drew a glare from Romney but laughs from the audience when he quipped, “I just wanted to say to Governor Romney, we disagree on a lot of issues, but I agree that you are the candidate of change.”

 

Indeed, there’s very little that seems capable of knocking McCain off his game right now. Earlier in the day, his town-hall meeting in Salem was repeatedly interrupted by a group of protestors who were demanding more money for HIV/AIDS treatment. The crowd booed them lustily, but McCain was unfazed. After some of his staffers ushered a group of them out at the beginning of the meeting, after they interrupted McCain's opening remarks, he invited them back in. “This is the purpose of town halls,” he explained, “to have the exchange of ideas and views and I don’t think I’ve ever had a town-hall meeting where I didn’t try to listen to everybody.” And when the protestors accepted that invitation but continued to interrupt the meeting, McCain calmly asked them to wait their turn to ask him a question. When that didn’t work, he jokingly threatened, “I’ve got some old veterans here. . . .Wilford Brimley is here!” (It turns out Noa Briqualon is a former Marine. Who knew?) And McCain’s aides ushered the group out again.

 

Amazingly, the protestors were let back into the meeting again and they thrust their hands in the air as McCain took questions from the audience. I assumed McCain would simply ignore them. But as the meeting went into its second hour and dozens of hands remained in the air, McCain, with time for one final question, turned to a protestor and said, “Yes, maam, go ahead.” The protestor promptly launched into a speech and McCain gently interrupted, “Do you have a question? Then please state the question.” She did and McCain answered it. The rally ended and, as McCain stood in the middle of a large scrum of admirers, he looked as placid as could be.

 

--Jason Zengerle

Posted: Sunday, January 06, 2008 7:41 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

WoodyBombay said:

Did media members hoist him on their shoulders and carry him out of the room like he was Vince Lombardi?

January 6, 2008 8:21 PM

alexharris said:

Jason,

McCain may be doing a better job of keeping his cool, but I think he hurt himself on Russert's show today.  Not because he lost his cool (he didn't), but because in response to a direct question, he unequivocally stated that going into Iraq would have been the the right decision, EVEN IF WE HAD ABSOLUTELY KNOWN that Saddam didn't have any WMD.  If this is what the man really believes, than he has lost something far greater than his cool -- he has lost his mind, or at the very least his judgment.  

He repeatedly stated the problem wasn't the decision to go into Iraq, but rather the initial execution.  He was directly channeling Bill Kristol on this one.  McCain didn't even attempt to make the nuanced (and essentially truthful) justification:  "the intel was severely compromised, but most experts believed that Saddam had probably reconstituted his programs, even though they lacked hard evidence".  He only made a passing mention of the more base (and factually misleading) argument:  "the best intelligence at the time indicated Saddam had WMD".   Rather, he focused on the crudest of defenses:  "Saddam was bad, so invastion was the right decision in any circumstance".

Having watched analysis of the Administration's efforts to make the case for WMD BEFORE the war, I have always taken a dim view of people claiming that "no one knew the intel was cooked" (I recall a very good pre-war article in this magazine which pretty thoroughly shredded the publicly-presented intel on the issue at that time).  At the same time, however, I can understand the argument that while we didn't have any good intel on the subject, we all really expected that WMD were there.  (I opposed the invasion, but was pretty certainly Saddam had WMD).  BUT, at that time the inspectors had, in fact, gotten unprecedented access, and by their very presence were undermining Saddam's regime.  Whether that and other efforts to undermine Saddam would have been effective, can never be known because Bush was too trigger happy to let the inspections proceed, lest his chance to play "war president" be made moot by success via some means less satisfying to his ego.  McCain's adoption of Bush's crudest rationale for the war should, and hopefully will, cost McCain any chance of wooing independent voters to his candidacy in the general election.

January 6, 2008 8:44 PM

ZACummings said:

I have been a fan of McCain (though not a supporter) way before this campaign started. But if alexharris' account of McCain's Meet The Press interview is accurate, then I can't root for him anymore.

Which is a shame for the GOPers. He was their last hope.

January 7, 2008 1:22 AM

boxofrox said:

If a McCain-Obama matchup comes to fruition get ready for an honest discussion about Iraq and the Middle-east. The shape of which will surprise those of us who allowed outlook to become colored exclusively by Bush hatred and the desire to exact revenge for years of biting at the heels of a Clinton/Democrats administration.

January 7, 2008 9:51 AM

meekstvsu said:

On alexharris's comment above, Sen. McCain's judgment could rightly be challenged if he accepted the premise that certain knowledge of Saddam lacking WMD in 2003 is an appropriate way to judge the' decision to invade .    But he rejected if that premise  (see www.msnbc.msn.com/.../3 ). Rather, he said that "better information that we have changes your decision-making process," .that Saddam was still a serious threat (for multiple reasons), that the question of perfect information posed would have been moot if prosecution of the war had not failed, and that the premised perfect informmation was at variance with intelligence agency judgments across the world.   In light of these, "[t]he war, the invasion was not a mistake.  The handling of the war was a terrible mistake."  

January 7, 2008 3:29 PM

The Plank said:

Well, at least one thing went well for Mitt Romney tonight. When he came out to give his concession speech

January 8, 2008 10:34 PM