TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM
July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
19.12.2007
Dana Perino's Strange NYT Response

Shorter Washington Post, on the White House's reaction to this morning's big New York Times story: "We might have told the CIA to destroy the interrogation tapes, but we definitely didn't lie about it afterward!" I'm not sure exactly how this is supposed to make the administration look better, although now that Perino mentions it, I guess it's true that most instances of Bush administration misconduct have been accompanied by efforts to mislead journalists.

It seems like Perino's really being overly defensive here--the Times didn't accuse the administration of misleading the press. It just said that the administration had yet to publicly acknowledge the extent of its lawyers' involvement in the discussions about whether to destroy the tapes. In any case, it's well worth reading the whole story. Bottom line:

At least four top White House lawyers took part in discussions with the Central Intelligence Agency between 2003 and 2005 about whether to destroy videotapes showing the secret interrogations of two operatives from Al Qaeda, according to current and former administration and intelligence officials.

This story isn't going away anytime soon.

--Josh Patashnik 

Posted: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:59 AM with 3 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

ejbenjamin said:

I've really enjoyed all the wild, irresponsible speculation around the web about what was on those tapes.  For those of us waiting for one of the Bush administration's scandals to really take them down-- it has to happen!-- this one feels like the day before Christmas.  Only the week leading up to the Fitzgerald case / Libby indictment was more exciting.

December 19, 2007 11:26 AM

jet said:

Could there have been a "You Tube" rationale to the whole decision?

December 19, 2007 12:35 PM

Beltway Confidential said:

(ap) Dana Perino, not taking it personally. (Honk!) Morning reading list: Presser! President Bush is having one this morning. We strongly suspect at least mild gloating. Ciao, Tancredo: The bellicose congressman from Colorado is dropping out of the race

December 20, 2007 10:19 AM