TNR BLOGS

November 20, 2008 | 3:55 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:45 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:06 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

November 20, 2008 | 2:15 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:52 PM
November 20, 2008 | 11:06 AM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
26.11.2007
Condi Media Watch

Today's edition comes courtesy of Elisabeth Bumiller, whose front page NYT story discusses Rice's "evolution" on the matter of U.S. engagement in Middle East peace talks. Bumiller's piece has all the hallmarks we've come to know and expect from gushing Condi profiles. First, an early sentence (which the author must know is grossly exaggerated) about Rice's committment to some particular cause:

Nearly seven tumultuous years later, Ms. Rice, as secretary of state, has led the Bush administration to a startling turnaround and is now thrusting the United States as forcefully as Mr. Clinton once did into the role of mediator between the Israelis and Palestinians. [Italics Mine]

Bumiller really believes this? Next, we have the supposed "causes" of Rice's views:

Ms. Rice’s thinking on the Middle East changed for several reasons, her aides said. She has been under increasing pressure to get involved in the peace negotiations from European and Arab leaders whose support she needs for the campaign of diplomatic and economic pressures on Iran. She considers it equally important, her aides said, to shore up the moderate leadership of Mr. Abbas, who is facing a sharp internal challenge from the more militant Hamas faction.

Then, the all-too-telling anecdote:

Ms. Rice, who had heralded the election as a symbol of the new stirrings of democracy in the Middle East, was so blindsided by the victory that she was startled when she saw a crawl of words on her television screen while exercising on her elliptical trainer the morning after the election: “In wake of Hamas victory, Palestinian cabinet resigns.”

“I thought, ‘Well, that’s not right,’” Ms. Rice recalled. When the crawl continued, she got off the elliptical trainer and called the State Department.

“I said, ‘What happened in the Palestinian elections?’” Ms. Rice recalled. “And they said, ‘Oh, Hamas won.’ And I thought, ‘Oh my goodness, Hamas won?’”

Oh dear. Finally,  the belated admission that the reasons behind Rice's "maturation" are very easily explained. 

Since then, Ms. Rice has made eight trips to the region, and her supporters say she remains determined against the odds. “She knows very well if she doesn’t do anything, she will be Iraq,” a European diplomat and a friend of hers said.

For the best/worst example of this sort of hagiography, be sure and check out David Samuels' profile from last year.

--Isaac Chotiner

Posted: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:57 PM with 8 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

teplukhin2you said:

Condi who?

November 26, 2007 6:06 PM

purcellneil said:

Bumiller seems to specialize in this sort of kiss-up journalism.  Her byline is a waste of time.

November 26, 2007 6:27 PM

teplukhin2you said:

What the f*** is she doing in Annapolis? Why isn't she shuttling to Tehran, Moscow, Delhi and Beijing?

November 26, 2007 8:56 PM

The Plank said:

Earlier I alluded to David Samuels' dreadful profile of Condoleezza Rice in The Atlantic last year

November 26, 2007 9:36 PM

sabaka said:

If I didn't know that Ms.Rice is a bright star  in the field of international politics and foreign relations,  I'd say that she's totally clueless and one of the worst incompetents in the Bush administration.  But since I know better, I confidently predict that, due to her efforts,  Israeli-Arab peace will follow shortly.  Then the coalition of US, EU, UN, Israel and moderate Arab states will present a unified front against Iranian nuclear ambitions  forcing the latter to join the fight against  global warming instead.  

And if that doesn't happen,  it will be Israel's fault anyway.

November 26, 2007 11:50 PM

blackton said:

sabaka. lol. and after this she will seduce Musharraf into giving up Osama, and convert Pakistan to Christianity.

November 27, 2007 10:37 AM

stanleybrown said:

Even after re-reading the article, I don't think it's fair to describe it as "gushing" or "hagiography".  Yes, that tossed-off remark about being involved as forcefully as Bill Clinton is silly, but the article as a whole is reasonable.  It clearly quotes what Rice and her staff would like to portray as her evolution and does not present their description as objective fact.  It quotes a prominent and well-informed critic (Dennis Ross), as well as unnamed critics who characterize Annapolis as "an elaborate photo opportunity."  As you quote, it cites the incident (which I hadn't read about previously) of her being so surprised by the result of the Palestinian election (which struck me as strong evidence of the ill-informed nature of the Bush administration in general and her in particular).  This is followed by a reference to her "credibility [being] further damaged."  This is hagiography?  Seems to me this is reasonable journalism.  Maybe you'd only be satisfied if the article ended with a demand for her resignation, but that's not the role of a reporter for the New York Times

November 27, 2007 6:48 PM

mstier said:

Ok, so we're expected to believe that the secretary of state hears the Palestinian election results on TV? She doesn't send a cable, or e-mail, or whatever they use these days, to our ambassador instructing that she get a call when there's a clear result?

November 27, 2007 9:42 PM