TNR BLOGS

August 29, 2008 | 4:54 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:44 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:42 PM

August 27, 2008 | 11:42 PM
August 27, 2008 | 6:45 PM
August 27, 2008 | 6:43 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

August 29, 2008 | 6:47 PM
August 29, 2008 | 4:44 PM
August 28, 2008 | 6:37 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
05.11.2007
Winners Win, Losers Lose

Campaign superblogger Marc Ambinder tosses out a scenario in which the GOP presidential nomination could remain up for grabs until March:

Mitt Romney wins Iowa; Mike Huckabee is second; Rudy Giuliani is third; Fred Thompson is fourth.

Giuliani wins New Hampshire, followed by Romney or Huckabee or McCain.

Romney wins Michigan; Huckabee or McCain is second.

Thompson wins South Carolina, followed by Giuliani. Romney is third....

Ambinder is following the race far more closely (and astutely) than I am, but there's simply no way that Fred Thompson finishes fourth in Iowa, and third or (very likely) worse in both New Hampshire and Michigan, and nonetheless wins South Carolina. It Just Won't Happen. The primary season is extremely dynamic, and candidates who win states (or significantly exceed expectations) get a huge boost at the expense of those who--like Ol' Fred in this scenario--look like losers. That's the whole problem with the primary calendar: Once small, unrepresentative states such as Iowa and New Hampshire create a political narrative for the race, it's very hard to break free of it. If Thompson really wants to have a shot at winning South Carolina, he's going to have to do better in the earlier states than he does in the scenario above.

 --Christopher Orr

Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007 4:54 PM with 4 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

virginiacentrist said:

Yeah. If I'm Romney, I'm running ads in all of the post-NH states with Mitt Romney making an acceptance speech in Iowa/NH with big headlines that say, "Romney wins" and tons of balloons falling. Voters will say: "Duhhh....me like winners and balloons....me vote for Romney...."

Same deal with the dems after Iowa. If Edwards or Obama manage to win, they need to run ads IMMEDIATELY in NH that basically have Obama or Edwards with balloons and confetti falling giving speeches and holding their arms up and what not while using the word "winner" and maybe the phrase "look at those shiny balloons" over and over. Then they'll win NH by 20% as old people travel to the polls and write in "Barack Balloons Obama" or "John Confetti Edwards"

Primary voters are dumb.

November 5, 2007 5:50 PM

Robert Powell said:

Why has Talkback been killed? Nothing has been posted in over four days. Hell00000!

November 6, 2007 3:09 AM

sullydog said:

ROBERT, I'M WITH YOU

It's time for the loyal online readers of this magazine to stage a revolt. This new website is a TOTAL PIECE OF SHIT.

As to post itself, yeah, I'm in agreement. Even more so, I'm in agreement with virginacentrist: primary voters are DUMB. But then, voters are dumb in general.

November 6, 2007 10:13 AM

The Stump said:

For all the attention Rudy Giuliani got with that Pat Robertson endorsement earlier this week, the numbers

November 9, 2007 10:33 AM