TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
18.10.2008
The End of Nixonland

Rick Perlstein's Nixonland brilliantly covers a period that is finally coming to an end.

Perlstein's book focuses on Richard Nixon's runs for the White House, beginning in 1966.  Democrats, facing a voter backlash over rioting, crime, and the Vietnam War lost 47 House seats in 1966.  Nixon rode that revolt into the White House two years later and exploited it while in office to win re-election in a landslide in 1972. 

Perlstein correctly states that Nixon came "to power by using the anger, anxieties, and resentments produced by the cultural chaos of the 1960s," and defines Nixonland as the state of total political warfare over class and cultural conflicts.

Nixonland, the book, ends in 1972, but Nixonland, the place, endured, through the 70s and 80s, up until George W. Bush's re-election in 2004.  Welfare queens, Willie Horton, Swiftboats; all Nixonland tactics, all designed to cleave Americans along racial and cultural lines.  Perlstein writes, "What Richard Nixon left behind was the very terms of our national self-image: the notion that there are two kinds of Americans.  On the one side the "Silent Majority"...On the other side are the "liberals." 

The politics of Nixonland proved very successful for the Republicans, if not for America.  Of the ten Presidential elections between 1968 and 2004, Republicans won 7.  The only two term Democrat elected in that period was hamstrung for three-quarters of his Presidency by a Republican Congress.  In Nixonland conservatives mostly set the agenda and framed the debate.  When Bill Clinton famously declared "the era of big government is over" in 1996 he was conceding the obvious -- in fact it had ended at least a decade earlier.

Nixonland was fought over by World War Two Veterans, and their children, the baby boomers.  Among Bill Clinton's talents was a particular ability to understand Nixonland's rules, and in 1992, to win despite them  Running as a "new kind of Democrat," Clinton grasped the need for Democrats to move to the center on crime and welfare.  By the time he was re-elected in 1996, they had. 

In retrospect Clinton's ability to take two of the hottest button issues away from Republicans began to signal the end of Nixonland, but it was not until 2006, when Democrats won 31 seats in the House and six in the Senate that the period that began with a Republican rout 40 years earlier came to an end.  

Barack Obama's speech at the Democratic convention in 2004, where he proclaimed that "there's not a liberal America and a conservative America — there's the United States of America" was a direct challenge to Nixonland and demonstrated an early understanding that its politics were waning.

John McCain, raised in Nixonland, calls Senator Obama a socialist, trots out a plumber to stoke class and cultural resentments, and employs his Vice-President to question Obama's patriotism by linking him to terrorists.  Nixonland 101 -- and if its rules still applied, Senator Obama would be in trouble. 

But they don't.  

Between the Iraq War, and Katrina, and the collapse of Wall Street, the underpinnings of Republican dominance have been knocked away.  Pre-emptive war and deregulation have been discredited.  Republican bankers are practicing socialists, begging for direct government intervention in their businesses.  The most popular General since Eisenhower has endorsed Senator Obama.

And America looks different: in 1970 84% of Americans were non-hispanic whites  -- today that percentage is 68%.  The nation is more diverse and more tolerant.

The old tactics aren't working and the American public is ready for change.  Senator McCain seems old, and tired, as if he is speaking an ancient language. 

Barack Obama is headed for a big win, and he will be able to work with large majorities in the Senate and the House.  Nixonland is dead.  Obamaland, anyone?

 

Howard Wolfson also blogs at GothamAcme.

 

Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2008 5:44 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

parnest said:

Great post! "Nixonland" captures the moment in one word (something the GOP is supposedly better at).

October 20, 2008 5:23 PM

lesserliz said:

Uh not so fast-as Messala said to Ben Hur as he lay broken and dying after the chariot race, "It goes on, Judah, it goes on." It's not an ending it's just a big pendulum that swings back and forth. The ever encroaching and all consuming central planning state with its always ongoing-war-somewhere continues to take over the body of our Republic like The Blob. Nothing really changes just the two parties who get to take their turn when a particularly bad eruption occurs on the others watch.

When Nixon got in did he stop LBJ's war or expand it? And he was an even  bigger welfare-stater than LBJ. Did the Dems stop Bushes War when they took Congress in '06. When Obama gets in, well we'll get a top tax rate of 39 1/2 instead of McCains 35-a veritable French Revolution!  They both voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act and Obama will just move soldiers to  different fronts-no scaling back of the MI complex. The plutocrats like Paulson and his former financial market colleagues, along with activist central bankers, led by Bernanke, will continue to absorb and distort markets while blaming the damage caused on the failure of free markets.

A perfect metaphor for this is Colin Powell. He now switches from the Repugs where he has been from the My Lai massacre to Iran-Contra, from Washington's long and murderous collusion with Saddam to its long and murderous campaigns to remove him, Powell has been instrumental in perpetrating or covering up atrocities and abominations on a gigantic scale. Now he goes on to advise Obama to...Pakistan? Iran? Syria? Georgia? Oh well the more things change... Wonder what the real end will look like when it finally comes-Zimbabwe...Weimar...Rome? Now those would be real endings.

October 20, 2008 11:00 PM

TLaBorn said:

You know this whole do-nothing congress meme is tiresome.  The Dems did not get 2/3's of the senate/congress which makes it impossible for them to push stuff past good ole Bush.  We ended up with the same BS the Republicans do every time which is stonewall real progress to keep their bellies fat and their wallets lined.  I am so tired of these corrupt incumbents.  Don't get me wrong I believe this two party system is complete garbage and believe an approach where people vote with their heads and not their dicks / wallets would go a long way to fixing America.

October 21, 2008 7:26 PM

mjhollerich said:

Perlsteinis my bedtime reading.  He's a talented writer, and of course I'm enjoying revisiting the world of my college years.  Like re-reading scads of old newspapers.  I think Perlstein's basic story line is correct. But I would add, as Sam Tanenhaus did some weeks ago, that he's left out the ideas aspect of the story.  Though liberals may not like to admit it, for a couple of decades the conservatives, or the neo-conservative rebels against their own liberalism, did have a monopoly on the new ideas.  That they've overplayed their hand is irrelevant.  I remember when a guy like Moynihan caught heat for telling the truth about the downside of welfare liberalism.  Re-read his and Glazier's Beyond the Melting Pot.  They saw the problems with the complacent, bloated, socially obtuse, tone-deaf liberalism that sent the Democratic Party into cryogenic slumber for a couple of decades.  

October 22, 2008 3:56 AM

fougasseu said:

Great post, and the demographic shift since '70 says it all. In '70 84% of Americans were non-Hispanic white, today that number is 68%, and falling. Unless the GOP figures out how to build a bigger tent, they are on the verge of extinction.

October 22, 2008 9:12 AM

jdcarteriii said:

The Elefantes have one place to go.  To a large group, maybe in the the South(west), who share many values, like religion, traditional family values, and work ethic.  Hmm, what was that again?

"non-Hispanic whites".  How about Hispanic whites?

We are gonna be the biggest swing vote reagan democratish tent builders with or without new republic and snide east coast libs.  if Obama loses its cause we stay home.  Viva Clinton!

October 28, 2008 9:57 AM