TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 5:02 PM
July 03, 2009 | 4:51 PM
July 03, 2009 | 4:35 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
05.10.2008
It's Over: Why Bill Ayers Won't Save John McCain

Perpetually fretting Democrats will not want to accept it. The campaigns themselves can't afford to believe it. Many journalists know it but can't say it. And there will certainly be some twists and turns along the way. But take it to a well capitalized bank: Bill Ayers isn't going to save John McCain.  The race is over.

John McCain's candidacy is as much a casualty of Wall Street as Lehman or Merrill. Like those once vibrant institutions, McCain's collapse was stunning and quick. One minute you are a well-respected brand. The next you are yelling at the messengers of your demise as all around you the numbers start blinking red and stop adding up.

McCain's road was difficult to begin with: the President of his party has had record-low approval ratings for two years and the number of Americans who say the country is heading in the wrong direction is stratospheric. He also had the misfortune to be pitted against an exceptional candidate running an extremely well-executed campaign.

Still, before Wall Street's collapse Senator McCain was ahead. His approval ratings remained high, his VP pick had generated excitement and interest, and his campaign operatives were capable, on any given day, of winning news cycles and giving their opponents fits. And then the underpinnings of American capitalism begin to sink -- and with them sunk McCain.

An election dominated at its inception by the war in Iraq is now overwhelmingly focused on the economy. More than half of voters in polls say that the economy is their top concern and Senator Obama enjoys double digit leads among voters asked who can better fix our economic mess. Put simply, there is no way Senator McCain can win if he continues to trail Senator Obama by double digits on the top concern of more than half of voters.

State polls are beginning to reflect this. If the election were tomorrow, Obama would win all of the states John Kerry carried and add Iowa, New Mexico, Colorado, Virginia, Nevada, Ohio and Florida. Barack Obama is campaigning in Indiana, which last went for a Democrat in 1964 and North Carolina, which has gone for a Democrat only once in thirty-four years. At the same time John McCain has pulled out of Michigan and Sarah Palin has been forced to visit Nebraska.

This dynamic is very unlikely to change. John McCain's goal in the first debate was to discredit Senator Obama as a credible Commander in Chief and elevate the issue of foreign policy and national security. He didn't come close. Absent a domestic terror attack the economy will remain the number one issue in the race, and there is little Senator McCain can do to make up his gap with Senator Obama on it. Oh, Senator McCain will try to make issues of Bill Ayers and Tony Rezko and Rev. Wright, and that might hurt Senator Obama around the margins -- but it will not prevent him from winning.  The economy is simply bigger than the rogues gallery that John McCain is conjuring up.

Why is this?  Why won't the swiftboat tactics work this year? 

Its easy to lose sight of it in the day to day coverage, but the collapse of Wall Street in the last weeks was a seminal event in the history of our nation and our politics. To put the crisis in perspective, Americans have lost a combined 1 trillion dollars in net worth in just the last four weeks alone.  Just as President Bush's failures in Iraq undermined his party's historic advantage on national security issues, the financial calamity has shown the ruinous implications of the Republican mania for deregulation and slavish devotion to totally unfettered markets.  

Republicans and Democrats have been arguing over the proper role of government for a century. In 1980 voters sided with Ronald Reagan and Republicans that government had become too big and intrusive.  Then the economy worked in the Republicans' favor.  Today the pendulum has swung in our direction.  Republican philosophies have been discredited by events. Voters understand this. This is a big election about big issues. McCain's smallball will not work. This race will not be decided by lipsticked pigs. And John McCain can not escape that reality. The only unknowns are the size of the margin and the breadth of the Democratic advantage in the next Congress.

 

Howard Wolfson also blogs at Gotham Acme

Related:

The Resentments of Sarah Palin by Noam Scheiber

Howard Wolfson on the Palin-Biden Debate

 

Posted: Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:41 AM with 27 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

satyendra said:

"He also had the misfortune to be pitted against an exceptional candidate running an extremely well-executed campaign. "  I'm glad to hear someone finally attributing Obama's success to his competence, rather than dumb luck.  Even though his IL Senate opponents were initially Jack Ryan, whose tastes for public sex the Chicago Tribune exposed after demanding his divorce files be unsealed.  Then along came Alan Keyes, carpetbagger extraordinaire.

As far as Ayers goes, does that even play any more? Sorry, it's just not an up to date representation of your terrorist.

October 6, 2008 9:09 AM

kj_593 said:

You nailed it.

October 6, 2008 10:37 AM

fougasseu said:

As for Zogby, the post-debate numbers are bad for McCain/Palin. Looks like she hurts more more than helps.

More Palin!

October 6, 2008 11:00 AM

timteeter said:

Mostly correct, but I disagree to this extent: Obama's poll numbers were improving before the Paulson freak-out, and likely would have continued to improve even without the collapse of Lehman brothers.  Wall Street has just made more profound a victory that was coming anyway.

October 6, 2008 11:09 AM

baxterjones said:

Please don't say "it's over" until Nov. 5th!!!  There are plenty of pitfalls in the next few weeks, starting with the two remaining debates. I believe Obama is ahead, but I suspect the race is closer than the polls suggest, partly due to conservatives' suspicion of "the media" and polling organizations. Let's not relax.

And if Obama does win, let's keep the celebration dignified, with snark and triumphalism put aside. If elected, he will face historic challenges, and will need the goodwill of those who did not vote for him but are willing to see how he performs (yes, such people exist, at least outside Washington).

October 6, 2008 12:24 PM

blackton said:

baxter, Obama will keep it dignified, myself I am going to rub it in the face of every right wing idiot I can find. They will get over it soon enough as we had to get over Bush.

October 6, 2008 1:29 PM

MichLib said:

This is a little too assumptive. Sure, Obama's ahead but it does not help Democrats to declare victory, a la GWB on the airforce carrier, just yet.

And want to know my prediction? Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites and causes huge turmoil in the Middle East which will bring foreign policy back to the forefront. Obama could still win then, too, but don't count John McCain out.

October 6, 2008 3:09 PM

basman said:

Barring some radical event, I cannot see Obama losing. For those who would want to "...rub it in the face of every right wing idiot ..." they can find, my advice is to go easy, and have a little rachmoness on your fellow man or woman with difffering points of view.

One of my doubting Thomas friends says in the end the "Bradley effect" will save McCain. I can't see that at all, and you all having a black (to some extent) president has even manyof  us north of the 49th parallel defrosting ourselves with the warm satisfaction of anticipating that particular prospect, the doubts of some of us about Obama notwithstanding.

October 6, 2008 4:56 PM

nturner said:

Howard,

For the sake of this country, I hope to God you're wrong.  I supported Hillary Clinton in the primary, but Barack Obama is shockingly, horrifyingly wrong on so many fundamental issues.  He's downright dangerously inept when it comes to foreign policy.  Clinton's criticisms of him weren't just good politics, they happened also to be right.  I really wonder how you could have forgotten all of this.  When it comes to the "game" of electoral politics, you may be correct to say that Obama is winning.  But this election is much more important than gamesmanship, and an Obama "win" will be an American loss.  Of that much, I am absolutely sure.

October 6, 2008 5:32 PM

maxblum13 said:

Fellow Young People: Don't listen to this guy.  get off your ass and vote.

October 6, 2008 5:38 PM

arsonplus said:

Just want to second what Maxblum13 said!!!!

And if, like myself you happen to have parents, grandparents or aunts and uncles in a swing state [read: a free bed and breakfast in FL, VA, NC, IN, PA, OH or CO] take a week off, take a road trip and volunteer at the appropriate Obama campaign office.

Turnout will determine the winner of this election.

October 6, 2008 6:19 PM

tdwis said:

"I supported Hillary Clinton in the primary, but Barack Obama is shockingly, horrifyingly wrong on so many fundamental issues."

And so your hope is that Howard Wolfson is wrong and McCain wins? What kind of Hillary Clinton supporter are you? I suspect you are in fact either Hillary, Bill, or Harold Ickes, posting under the pseudonym nturner.

October 6, 2008 6:46 PM

jellisdga said:

nturner -- Every one of your posts has indicated extreme and irrational hatred of Obama, without any substantive reasoning.  I can not for the life of me understand why you would have actually voted for Hillary Clinton (if, indeed you really did) -- whose policy positions virtually mirror Obama's on every major issue -- and now support John McCain.

What do you believe in?  Because based on your writing, I would suggest the number one issue you care about is the race of your candidate -- as that is about the only common trait shared by both Clinton and McCain.

October 6, 2008 6:47 PM

psantillana said:

My suspicion is that nturner was never pro-Clinton, but always just anti-Obama.

October 6, 2008 7:16 PM

nturner said:

I don't buy for one millisecond the notion that Barack Obama will protect Israel.  There will be a fundamental shift in our foreign policy with respect to Israel, and I guarantee it won't make Israel, the Middle East, or the United States a safer place as a result!  Furthermore, Obama will be tested by our enemies in the first 100 days of his presidency.  They'll look at him like the naif he is.

The racial invective that gets thrown at anybody who even suggests Obama isn't appropriate for the job is thoroughly repulsive.  Political liberalism is supposed to be about free and open discourse, yet you frauds try to shut it down with the most offensive of insults.  I have never suggested anything negative about Obama's race, and you loons know it!  This place is becoming DailyKos II.  I HAVE frequently criticized his debate arguments (meeting with dictators), his policy proscriptions (anti-growth economics), and his legislative record (or lack thereof).

And psantillana, just because I didn't follow you into the cult of personality like the rest of the leftist whackjobbery doesn't for a second undermine my claim to being a genuine Hillary Clinton supporter.  I volunteered for her, I gave her ever penny I could spare, and I would have cried tears of joy to see her inaugurated.  But just because Obama gives lip service to some of her positions doesn't make me believe he'll have either the inclination or the political talent to institute them as president.  Couple that with the fact that Obama is a blame-America-first, leftist radical and you've got NO DEAL.

October 6, 2008 8:11 PM

virginiacentrist said:

Howard:

The one thing you fail to mention is that the Democrats nominated a likable candidate this year. That's why the smears won't stick. They nominated a candidate who young people could relate to, and a candidate who the voters see as a saint (look at his recent favorability ratings in the 60s).

That's why the attacks don't stick.  People don't want to believe something negative about a candidate that they like or relate to. On the other hand, when you're dealing with a polarizing candidate who doesn't connect with voters, pretty much everything tends to stick.

That is the great lesson for Democrats. Charisma and character over calculation. Hard work and innovation over legacy.

nturner: Did you just utter the words "Blame America first"? Do you actually pay for TNR so that you can come on the message boards and spout that stuff?

PS: I'm sorry Hillary lost. But she's a horrible human being, so actually I'm not!

October 6, 2008 8:24 PM

virginiacentrist said:

Blackton: It's not about rubbing in the faces of Right-wingers. That's not going to feel good. What's going to feel good is rubbing in the faces of these nutcase Hillary supporters (all 3,000 of them nationwide) who refuse to support Obama. And their entire argument was that he was unelectable. How pathetic!

October 6, 2008 8:26 PM

Nusholtz said:

Nturner

   I would really like to understand why Israel will be worse off under an Obama Presidency than a McCain presidency, assuming that McCain will duplicate Bush's efforts,  Prior to Bush's election, Israel was closer to peace than it is today and anti American sentiment is high enough to cause any politician who runs against the U.S to get elected.

October 6, 2008 9:24 PM

sleepyavl said:

Israel will do not do anything rash before the US elections, precisely because it does not want to be be seen interfering with it. We Israelis know that Democrats are supporters of Israel, not any less than Republicans.

October 6, 2008 10:07 PM

basman said:

...What's going to feel good is rubbing in the faces of these nutcase Hillary supportesr...

Don't rub anybody's faces, I repeat: it's so, so, umm, unObama like.

October 6, 2008 10:24 PM

JEFF FREY said:

Good advice, basman, but it is going to be hard to follow. As you know, the other side has no compunctions about rubbing our faces in it.

October 7, 2008 1:37 AM

mikel95003 said:

Do Not Take Anything for Granted. We live in a country where voting machines are easily tampered with in many states, with little oversight, and no paper trail.  Get off your ass and vote is correct, and get your wallet out and send in a contribution to Barack Obama so we can get this country back on track before we drop into an abyss from which we can never recover.

October 7, 2008 2:42 AM

basman said:

Jeff : there is a latent truth here about the nature of the world and the difference between politics and what is ideal. What is ideal is an untrammeled purity; politics is the hurly burly of all that people are and do for good and for ill, sometimes great good and sometime great ill. That goes to the snippet I keep reproducing on Machiavelli and to why Socrates drank the cup of hemlock: the intractability of man as he is. Take a look at the last lines of Wallace Stevens's poem "Poems Of Our Climate" about the imperfect as our paradise, in that bitterness delight.

What can I tell you?

Over and out!

October 7, 2008 11:32 AM

Wandreycer1 said:

Good to hear that sleepy.

October 7, 2008 11:59 AM

fougasseu said:

Ayers' prosecutor speak out, supports Obama:

www.nytimes.com/.../l10ayers.html

October 10, 2008 4:50 PM

sportdoc62 said:

Some of us went into this election thinking the GOP had nominated the McCain who once was--the guy they passed over in 2000, passed over precisely because he was too moderate.  We believed the country had moved decisively away from Bush.  We thought, should Obama lose a close election to THAT McCain, there were worse things that could have happenend.  That perspective is no longer possible.  McCain has disqualified himself for the office in the past month.  He has breathed life into the worst remaining elements of the Bush Administration and is presiding over one of the most destructive presidential campaigns in US history.  It does not appear that we have seen the worst of it and the rabble that shows up to his campaign events may well get out of control.  John McCain is personally responsible for all of it.  He has erased any respect his venerated career might have earned him.   I no longer "honor his service."  Any venom that will be directed his way starting on November 6 will be well earned, and I, for one, will not mind at all participating in the party held on his political grave.  

October 10, 2008 6:36 PM

Nusholtz said:

I agree with Sportdoc62 and if McCain loses, I would like to hear his take on why, particularly if he agrees with it being the decisions that we all think were wrong.

October 13, 2008 8:14 PM