TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
27.11.2008
There Will Be Acid

Over the past few days, scientists have released a series of studies suggesting that the world's oceans are acidifying much faster than anyone thought possible. As an increasing amount of carbon-dioxide gets emitted into the atmosphere, the oceans have, in turn, been absorbing more of it, which causes the pH of the water to fall. Lower pH makes it hard for marine organisms to build shells out of calcium carbonate, a potentially deadly problem for shellfish, coral, and some kinds of plankton. (Last week, the Center for Biological Diversity sued the EPA over this very issue, using the Clean Water Act as a pretext.)

So how fast are we talking about? The ocean off the coast of Washington State is acidifying ten to 20 times faster than existing climate models had projected, according to a new paper published by researchers at the University of Chicago. The researchers found that the decreasing pH of ocean water at their monitoring site corresponded with a decline in mussel populations, presumably because the mussels had difficulty building shells.

The Southern Ocean around Antarctica is also acidifying at a distressing rate, according to a new paper by two Australian researchers. The study predicts that a tipping point in Southern Ocean acidification will take place when atmospheric carbon-dioxide levels reach 450 parts per million (see here for a recent debate among climatologists over what constitutes a "safe" level of CO2 in the atmosphere). At that point, the researchers argue, seasonal pH minimums will be low enough to disrupt the life cycle of several important species of hard-shell plankton. These plankton are at the base of the Antarctic marine food chain, so anything that harms them could eventually harm a lot of other species, including penguins, which have joined polar bears on the list of charismatic polar species put at risk by global warming.

Shockingly, oceans aren't the only bodies of water growing more acidic. Researchers in Kansas recently discovered that even groundwater is absorbing large amounts of carbon dioxide and becoming more acidic as a result. Groundwater that's more acidic dissolves rocks more quickly and picks up naturally-occurring heavy metal contaminants in the process. So rising atmospheric CO2 levels could make some people's well water unsafe to drink. If there were a prize for the least-expected unpleasant consequence of climate change, this is a discovery that would surely be a contender.

--Rob Inglis, High Country News

Posted: Thursday, November 27, 2008 7:12 PM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Wandreycer1 said:

Rob - great, thanks - I'll add this to my reasons to descend even deepr into despair.

November 28, 2008 8:31 PM

aeromonas said:

Bad news, good journalism.  The Vine is getting to be the only worthwhile part of TNRD.

In this line, I just read the Times review of Malcolm Gladwell's new book, and thought I'd like to take another look at Richard Posner's Gladwell smackdown in these pages.  Of course, TNR's "search" bar is a search bar in name only.  I type "Posner" and get zero hits.  "Please refine your search terms."  Hehe.  I remember the days when you could pull up an alphabetical list of TNR contributors and read just about every article each of them had written at least since TNR Digital came into being.  

So then I go to Google to search for the review there and still can get it, but I do get to a Plank thread from early 2007 in which Posner's review was mentioned by the late, great teplukhin.  I read the thread just for old times' sake and what struck me was that it was, like, smart.  And funny.  It was like an interesting, entertaining conversation between somewhat competitive friends.  Those were the days.  Nowadays it seems that the only threads that build any momentum are the ones that get hijacked by monomaniacal trolls such as jacobt and the recent entrant George Walton.  The fall-off in quality comments since Nov 4 is all too apparent.  The election juice had TNR Talkback on artificial respiration.  Of course, the real trauma came in October 2007.  

Seriously, I wish somebody would tell me, is TNR Digital making more money since the '07 revamp?  Is it even possible that it is?  Because for this subscriber, it's value has declined markedly as a result of last year's changes.  The election buzz kept me coming back, and I do very much appreciate The Vine, but I'm starting to think I ought to vote with my feet and cancel my subscription.  You guys don't seem to listen to anything else.

November 29, 2008 6:36 AM

cspencef said:

OK, what's going on with the link to the Kansas groundwater research?  Username and password?  Huh?  If something is up with my groundwater I'd like to be able to read it...

November 30, 2008 5:08 PM

Brad Plumer said:

Coding snafu. It should work now.

November 30, 2008 10:17 PM

Brad Plumer said:

aeronomas -- I'll pass along your comments to the web folks. Site improvements are rumored to be on the way, though to be honest, I'm not entirely sure...

December 3, 2008 2:32 PM

cspencef said:

Dang, now I'm wishing you hadn't fixed this link.  Now I'm no scientist, but doesn't this kind of result have to have some impact on the whole idea of carbon sequestration technologies, for example?

December 4, 2008 1:00 PM