TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
20.11.2008
Waxman Pulls Off An Upset

Wow, Henry Waxman actually managed to dislodge John Dingell from his perch atop the House energy and commerce committee. The full Democratic caucus approved the change this morning on a 137-122 vote. Dingell had seniority and, befitting a guy who's been toiling and backslapping in Congress since 1955, considerable sway in the chamber, so it was always outlandish to think that anyone could challenge him for the chairmanship—let alone win. Waxman no doubt benefitted from his close relationship with Nancy Pelosi, who has lately been skirmishing with Dingell over fuel-economy standards and climate legislation (she even set up a new select committee on global warming in 2006 to try to circumvent him). But the leadership largely stayed aloof from this particular feud.

It appears Waxman won, in part, because Democrats are increasingly focused on global warming and think now's the time to act, to make a decisive break with the do-nothing Bush years. Barack Obama just reiterated his intent to pursue a nationwide cap on greenhouse-gas emissions. In the Senate, both Jeff Bingaman and Barbara Boxer want to move forward. That just left the House, where, according to his critics, Dingell had been dragging his feet on the issue. His recent climate bill was attacked by many enviros—including one of Obama's top EPA transition officials—for being too flimsy and loophole-ridden. Dingell's caution was understandable: He represents Dearborn and the auto industry, and even though he's a genuine liberal who's done a lot of utterly indispensible environmental work (authoring the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act, for one), it's hard to support robust action on carbon while simultaneously sticking up for the more parochial interests of Ford, GM, and Chrysler.

Waxman has fewer constraints in that arena, and generally supports a much more aggressive stance toward climate change and curbing greenhouse-gas emissions. His own cap-and-trade bill is certainly ambitious, with far stricter targets than the Lieberman-Warner bill debated in the Senate over the summer, and he's even called for moratorium on new coal-fired plants that can't sequester their emissions. On environmental issues, at least, this is a massive policy shift, and one that a majority of House Democrats just endorsed. Whether Waxman can actually make these things happen remains to be seen.

--Bradford Plumer

Posted: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:06 PM with 4 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Handful of Sand said:

Now this may seem like major inside-baseball stuff, but when energy and health care reform are at the top of a new President's agenda, the House Energy and Commerce Committee is an important place. And for about 300 years, the...

November 20, 2008 11:59 AM

The Plank said:

Henry Waxman has succeeded --somewhat surprisingly--in his challenge to unseat John Dingell as chair

November 20, 2008 12:09 PM

lsernoff said:

Obama will rue the day.

November 20, 2008 3:36 PM

ironyroad said:

Why?

November 20, 2008 4:01 PM