TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
19.11.2008
Can The Power Industry Bail Out Detroit?

Major electric utilities are mulling over whether to buy up—well, preorder—thousands of electric cars from U.S. automakers, reports The Wall Street Journal. Now, it's no surprise that utilities would love for plug-ins to become the future of transport—it means they can sell more electrons without having to build tons of new plants. (One federal study found that 73 percent of the nation's light vehicles could be recharged using existing infrastructure if the cars were plugged in overnight; doing so would replace about 52 percent of America's current oil imports.)

But, right now, utility execs appear worried that GM's collapse and the general financial malaise among carmakers could set back work on the electric car. So the idea is that power companies would buy up tens of thousands of vehicles for their own company fleets to help give Congress confidence that there will actually be a market for the cleaner cars that a bailed-out Detroit would have to promise to make. (Indeed, that's one lingering question in this debate: Even if Congress gave the automakers $25 billion and required the companies to build more fuel-efficient cars, who's to say anyone will actually buy the new models?)

Of course, utilities aren't necessarily just thinking about supporting plug-ins to prop up GM. One interesting point the Journal piece gets into is that utilities want to play a much bigger role in managing the shift to electrified transport, to ensure that it doesn't put strain on the grid the way that the sudden burst in popularity of air conditioners did after World War II, taking the power industry by surprise. Anyway, these talks are all very early and it's unclear whether anything will come of this—but it's worth keeping an eye on.

--Bradford Plumer

Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 4:42 PM with 4 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

maxblum13 said:

Could Exxon Mobile make a play where they agree to loan Detroit money on a regular basis in exchange for a commitment to produce cheap inefficient vehicles?  It seems to me like they have as much a stake in this outcome as anyone else, only their interests swing the other way.

November 19, 2008 12:56 PM

cspencef said:

Hinted at in the last paragraph, but still left me wondering: is the electric industry actually afraid of an upgrade in the power grid?  I know I'm dumb, but I'm not seeing something here.

November 19, 2008 1:29 PM

Brad Plumer said:

I think they'd love help upgrading the grid--it's more that they'd like to get a jump on figuring out how an electric transportation infrastructure would interact with the current grid (so that they could assess what needs to be improved/changed).

November 19, 2008 1:51 PM

lsernoff said:

The bull.... flows like vitage wine.  The big three, and the UAW, made either no case or a weak case for a bailout.   The environmental left of the D party wants to re-design the transportation industry; the advancement of Henry Waxman today has advanced their agenda.  Poor Obama!  Hopefully not poor America!  

The right way to influence automobile design is to lay on a gradually growing gas tax, coupled with a tax credit that will make such a tax "neutral" for most Americans.   Both parties find this obvious solution unbearable.  Why?  We had a great economic "natural experiment" this summer on consumer reaction to a gas price hike; they quickly changed their usage an personal purchase habits ( a data set that is clearly complicated by the rest of the economic bad news still developing).  

We are going to bail out the domestic auto industry in the end; the economic pain would be more than the new ruling political class could endure.  The obvious, to me, route is to combine a bailout with a gas tax.  Make it as revenue neutral as possible from a tax/revenue perspective.  The second part has to be a "special" bankruptcy  for the big three that spreads pain among the UAW membership (particularly retirees), the overblown dealership compex, and rids us of the heritage management.

A dose of truth-seeking about costs, looking forward, would help to form a political consensus.  A little hyping of the truth about the improved  quality of the vehicles that Detroit is producing would help. We could do this, on a bipartisan basis. Will we?  Opponents have at me.

November 20, 2008 7:45 PM