TNR BLOGS

July 03, 2009 | 7:55 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:37 PM
July 03, 2009 | 7:12 PM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
04.10.2008
Solar Lining in the Bailout Bill

Yesterday, in addition to passing the once-doomed Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, otherwise known as "the bailout," the Senate and House did a very good thing: Lawmakers extended and modified the federal investment tax credit for residential and commercial solar energy development. Such tax credits, originally enacted in 2005, are generally recognized to be essential to help the younger industry compete against the (readily subsidized) coal, nuclear and oil industries, and to allow increased competition to drive solar products down the cost curve.

The industry has been thirsty for a show of government support for the many months during which the 30 percent tax credit was set to expire; the long, uncertain flirtation threatened the 60,000 people working in the solar industry, $230 billion in investments, and to reverse the doubling of solar electric capacity achieved between 2006 and 2007. Foot-dragging may even have artificially depressed US market demand during that time, sending big solar companies to nations like Germany, which has passed 20-year supports for sun energy. For those in the know, winning this extension--to last eight years, no less!--has been a hard slog. So when the bailout news broke, Wall Street may have been merely relieved--but Silicon Valley, incubator for some of the most exciting solar breakthroughs, was reportedly in full swoon:

 Some executives hauled out Champagne. Solar power advocates in San Francisco threw an impromptu party at a downtown bar.

"It's a fantastic day for the renewable-power industry," said Julie Blunden, vice president for public policy at SunPower Corp. of San Jose, after picking up a bottle of bubbly. "This is one of those few times when you can tell you're at a turning point."

Though the bailout ended up with a less than desirable number of legislative hangers-on (cf. the arrow-factory earmark that 337 members of Congress felt was necessary), this was a crucially important addition, geared at stopping the number of new solar projects from plunging, Dow-style, over the next several years, and to keep the notion of green job creation viable as the country's unemployment numbers tick up. A one year production tax credit also applies to other energy sources such as geothermal, biomass, hydropower, and wave energy--a new category. The only snag: Tax breaks for wind production were only extended for a single year. So although an encouraging amount of track has already been laid, we may be fighting this battle all over again in 2009.

--Dayo Olopade

Posted: Saturday, October 04, 2008 1:04 PM with 8 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

williamyard said:

This is terrific news for me personally because I'd hoped to add a PV system to my little Northern California ranchero but ran out of bread somewhere between a failed septic leach field and a busted well pump. Without the tax credit, the possibility of adding solar next year was beginning to slip away, even as my electric bill pushes toward $400/month and beyond.

Now it's back on the front burner--you're the bearer of great news, Dayo!!

October 5, 2008 7:04 PM

dhauck said:

Dayo -

I often read on this site about huge fossil fuel subsidies, especially when we're discussing subsidizing alternative energy methods.  But I've been trying to find some indication of that on the web (using the highly scientific method of googling "coal subsidies" and sifting through as far as "Gooo" before I got sick of it) and what I mostly find are articles on other environmental blogs, which also mention "huge subsidies" without actually mentioning specifics.  I did find several links to proposed subsidies for coal liquefaction, but these have not gone through yet.  So what subsidies, exactly, are we talking about?

Mind you, I'm not arguing this point, per se.  You live in this world, and I don't, so I'm sure you know more about it than I do.  Moreover, I can accept the possibility of heavy subsidies for fossil fuels.  It's just that this notion (like that of huge subsidies for highways over public transportation) is often put forth on this site without verification, as though it is basic knowledge I should already possess.  True or not, this just bothers me.  So could you please pass along some links to reports from non-partisan publications detailing some of these huge subsidies that the coal industry is getting and the alt-energy industries are not?  Thanks - I absolutely promise not to bother you again... until the next time I do.

October 6, 2008 3:16 PM

singlespeed said:

dhauck...

"subsidies" for oil, nuclear or coal tend to take the form of huge tax credits and loopholes which amount to a subsidy. Where the discrepancy lay is the disproportionate level of tax credits that are available to fossil fuels versus renewables like wind and solar. The original goal of the tax credits to fossils was to foster growth but in this day and age the foot hold that oil and coal have in the energy sector really amounts to the tax credits to be largess in the form of tacit subsidies.

As far as nuclear goes. That industry has never been able to operate day one without some form of tax subsidies from the govt. whether it be operational, fuels, waste disposal.

Most proponents of renewables (ethanol notwithstanding)  have argued that the tax credits and subsidies for fossil fuels and nuclear disadvantage solar and wind because they can't compete with the operational / startup costs whereas oil/coal/nuclear and even hydro have benefited from direct Federal and State financing  and / or subsidization as well as preferred regulatory and permitting issues. But the field is being leveled with this type of solar development credit. Which...if done right would really kick start an American industry that could export design, development and implementation technologies abroad.

October 6, 2008 6:22 PM

dhauck said:

Thanks, single.  I'm still looking for hard data, though.  Lemme try Google again, but with "tax breaks" instead of "subsidies", and see if I can turn something up.  When I argue, whether with people here or with my "Drill, baby, drill" Republican family, it's nice to have a stack of papers I can (metaphorically, at least) wave in people's faces.

October 7, 2008 4:58 AM

teplukhin2you said:

Lots of solar linings out there. Good time to consider investing in solar companies that have decent cash flow.

October 7, 2008 3:37 PM

Brad Plumer said:

dhauck -- Here's the most recent EIA report on federal energy subsidies, from 2007:

www.eia.doe.gov/.../index.html

Chapter 5 will probably have most of what you're looking for, and there are some historical tables in the appendices somewhere. Other reports will offer higher estimates, depending on whether they count things like the Price-Anderson Act (without which nuclear plants couldn't get insured) or even home heating programs like LIHEAP (which is an indirect subsidy), etc. The 2000 version of the EIA report had a helpful round-up of alternative estimates:

www.eia.doe.gov/.../table_a2.html

October 8, 2008 11:05 AM

dhauck said:

Thanks, Brad.  From my quick perusal, that's what I'm looking for, all right.  And yes, Chapter 5 seems to be the best source, as you say.  I'll have a read - I'm sick of the 24-hour elections coverage anyway.

October 8, 2008 12:38 PM

Environment and Energy said:

As Dayo noted earlier, the final version of the bailout bill was sprinkled with goodies for renewable

October 14, 2008 2:43 PM