TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 6:29 PM
July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
10.09.2008
Are White Roofs A Big Deal?

Is there a quick and handy way to cool down the planet? Maybe—and it might just take a few buckets of white paint and a little extra concrete. Fine, more than a few buckets, but still: The Los Angeles Times reports that Hashem Akbari, a physicist with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, has crunched the numbers and estimated that if the 100 biggest cities in the world simply turned all of their roofs white and used more reflective material for the pavement in their sidwalks, parking lots, and roads—concrete instead of asphalt, say—the cooling effects would be tremendous:

Globally, roofs account for 25% of the surface of most cities, and pavement accounts for about 35%. If all were switched to reflective material in 100 major urban areas, it would offset 44 metric gigatons of greenhouse gases, which have been trapping heat in the atmosphere and altering the climate on a potentially dangerous scale.

That is more than all the countries on Earth emit in a single year. And, with global climate negotiators focused on limiting a rapid increase in emissions, installing cool roofs and pavements would offset more than 10 years of emissions growth, even without slashing industrial pollution.

Keith Johnson of the Wall Street Journal pours a healthy bit of cold water on the idea, noting that "[t]he scale and cost of any program that would re-top all the roofs and paved surfaces in cities the size of Los Angeles, Mexico City, New Delhi, and Tokyo simultaneously" might well dwarf anything Al Gore's proposing. True. On the other hand, roughly three-quarters of all the buildings that will exist in the United States in 2035 either haven't even been built yet or will soon be renovated, so that's one easy place to start. (Presumably the figures are even higher for China and India.)

One side-benefit of painting roofs a blinding white—or installing vegetation-heavy green roofs—is that it can cut down on the need for air-conditioning in the summer: Buildings with green roofs are typically 30 percent cooler than their blacktopped counterparts. California, for one, has already revamped its building codes to require white roofs on all commercial buildings. Using more reflective material on roads and highways sounds more contentious, though the concrete industry is certainly keen on the idea.

--Bradford Plumer

Posted: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:47 PM with 7 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

robinmb said:

We live in Philadelphia in a house with a flat roof which we had converted to white last summer. This summer our electricity usage was 15-20% lower.

September 10, 2008 4:52 PM

singlespeed said:

Brad...keep the good posts coming.

But quoting the WSJ? Keith Johnson doesn't even offer anything remotely realistic in his response as 'cold water' except the standard whiny conservative position to any solution regarding sustainability, climate change or even common sense. Instead he says "But like with most grand plans, the devil is in the details. In many places, local zoning regulations strictly dictate architectural styles, including roof colors. Where white roofs are allowed or even required, progress comes piecemeal."

What? So because the yahoos in the Hamptons and covenant controlled gated communities want black tile roofs and high cooling costs the rest of the country shouldn't do anything?

Keith Johnson is fine example of why we find ourselves in the mess we're in and linking to the WSJ as a counter-opinion doesn't even do the word opinion justice. It's simply contrarian and defeatist.

September 10, 2008 5:08 PM

JEFF FREY said:

If the Wall Street Journal editorial page is against it, there's a good chance that it is a very good idea.

September 10, 2008 9:23 PM

reganad said:

Why would you have to repave with concrete?  Can't asphalt be painted (like, you know, with stripes to indicate lane lines)?  I bet paint is cheaper than concrete, even if it has to be renewed every year or two.

September 11, 2008 12:53 PM

tnmats said:

Regand, the labor costs would be ridiculous to paint those roads.  Plus, the paint would not hold up for that long.  Markers in roads don't take much heaving pounding unlike a driving lane.

September 12, 2008 11:50 AM

Environment and Energy said:

"White roofs" are, as I've mentioned before , one of the easiest ways to cool down the

January 7, 2009 1:55 PM

Environment and Energy said:

British reporters (and Matt Drudge) have been having gentle fun with Energy Secretary Steven Chu's

May 27, 2009 10:47 AM