TNR BLOGS

September 07, 2008 | 2:54 PM
September 06, 2008 | 4:31 PM
September 06, 2008 | 3:43 PM

September 05, 2008 | 2:53 PM
September 05, 2008 | 3:45 AM
September 05, 2008 | 12:25 AM

September 06, 2008 | 5:57 PM
September 06, 2008 | 5:54 PM
September 06, 2008 | 3:14 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

September 05, 2008 | 1:35 PM
September 03, 2008 | 1:01 PM
September 02, 2008 | 6:20 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
23.07.2008
About Those Evil Speculators...

So the Senate held a test vote yesterday on a bill to regulate "speculation" in the oil futures market, and it passed 95-0. Now, it seems unlikely this bill's going anywhere, seeing as how Republicans want to tack on a slew of drilling amendments that will no doubt bog the whole thing down—in fact, I'd give even odds that Congress doesn't pass any new energy bill before the August recess. Still, anti-speculator sentiment is quickly becoming as popular as the belief that the United States can drill its way out of high oil prices. 

The irony is that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission—the very same agency that would be empowered to restrict futures trading under the Senate bill—has concluded in an interim federal task force report, co-written with six other agencies, that investors aren't responsible for the recent spike in oil prices. The run-up, rather, has been "largely due" to boring old fundamentals: more people are burning oil and energy supplies are growing at a sluggish pace. One notable finding: Many speculative investors have been changing their position after prices move—not before—suggesting that they're "responding to new information—just as you'd expect in an efficiently operating market," rather than driving the price.

--Bradford Plumer

Posted: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:31 PM with 8 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

bigfish said:

But...but...if we can't blame environmentalists or Wall Street speculators for our gas price woes, how can either party promise a quick and painless fix just in time for the November election?  Why must this economic hardship be fixed by boring long-term things like reducing our use of oil and developing alternative energies?

July 23, 2008 2:55 PM

cspencef said:

How credible is the Commodity Futures Trading Commission?  Is it legit, or just another office stacked with a bunch of Bush cronies?  This naturally will affect how seriously to take their report...

July 23, 2008 3:24 PM

Brad Plumer said:

It seems pretty credible. The CFTC led the task force, but they had staffers from the Fed, the Depts. of Energy, Treasury, and Agriculture, the FTC, and the SEC. I guess they could all be a bunch of administration hacks trying to protect hedge funds and so forth, though I'm pretty sure the task force was set up by Reed and Levin…

July 23, 2008 3:29 PM

cthulhu2008 said:

Don't forget the debasement of the dollar...

July 24, 2008 1:03 PM

GSpinks said:

Lets not be coy, the Republicans' friends in Big Oil don't want to drill because producing more barrels of crude would invariably drive down prices, especially if it was domestic crude. They *do* want to allow the Big Oil to monopolize all of the federal lands in order to control the market of domestic crude to make sure that prices are not driven down.

July 24, 2008 5:56 PM

jyunis said:

Yes, debasement of the dollar, and insecurity over Israel/Iran.

July 24, 2008 6:12 PM

zaiquiri said:

Bigfish,

Well, how could we expect the pols to solve the problem anyway, seeing as how they created it.  I mean, I dunno about you, but my congressman personally held a gun to my head, and told me if I didn't buy a huge, energy inefficient house way out in the suburbs, and a huge, gas guzzling SUV to commute to and from it, that it would be LIGHTS OUT!!

And now, looks like it will be lights out anyway.

In a slightly different way of course, but oh... the irony!!

July 24, 2008 7:42 PM

bigfish said:

Well, zaiquiri, if my congressman personally held a gun to my head, I would do some mad jujitsu I saw on a movie once, pin him to the ground, and turn the gun on him.  Then, I'd take the tape recorder out of my pocket and politely remark that since I now have evidence of him pulling a gun on me, now would be the perfect time for him to sponser the "Bigfish Economic Stability Act."

July 25, 2008 9:10 AM