TNR BLOGS

November 20, 2008 | 3:55 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:45 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:06 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

November 20, 2008 | 2:15 PM
November 20, 2008 | 1:52 PM
November 20, 2008 | 11:06 AM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
30.06.2008
Permission to Contaminate, Sir!

The Pentagon is resisting the EPA’s orders to clean up its contaminated military sites, the Washington Post reports today. The danger? The Defense Department owns more Superfund sites than anyone else, as well as more than 25,000 contaminated sites nationwide, where the department's toxic legacy could pose serious risks to public health and the environment.

 

While the Post calls its recent pushback against the EPA’s regulatory efforts “unprecedented,” the Pentagon has been trying to grant itself the license to pollute and contaminate during the entirety of the Bush administration. The Pentagon sought sweeping exemptions from the Clean Air Act, tried to exclude explosives and munitions from being classified as hazardous waste, and attempted to deny compensation to state authorities when DOD sites contaminate public resources. Defense officials have argued that it needs such exemptions to control costs and enable the military “train as we fight,” and the EPA’s gutted budget and declawed regulatory capabilities have sapped its ability to push back.

 

The Pentagon may well be trying to go green to save on fuel costs, experimenting with alternative-energy projects like these nifty wind turbines at Guantanamo Bay. But when it comes to toxic missteps that have only human costs, it continues to shirk from its responsibility to clean up after itself. In a recent Senate committee hearing on Perchlorate--a substance in rocket fuel that has leaked from military bases nationwide--Defense officials were accused of trying to bury information about the chemical’s toxic properties to the endocrine system. Why? Well, according to the National Resource Defense Council, the substance’s widespread release has contaminated the drinking water of an estimated 20 million people. Without adequate regulation, such culprits appear to know few bounds.

 

­--Suzy Khimm

Posted: Monday, June 30, 2008 6:28 PM with 1 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

WaltB said:

What, no one thought about this before????  Does everyone think nuclear weapons come by way of a magic wand?  The real problem lies in DOD getting the funding to clean up sites and no one in Congress or the White House will belly up to that bar.  Just like Bush's wearing out every vehicle, ship and aircraft in his stupid war, but people saying how they can 'easily be replaced' - where's the money for that going to come from?  Who's going to pay?  You want green, you've got to pay for it.  You want security, you've got to pay for it.  No free lunches coming anytime soon.

July 1, 2008 10:17 AM