TNR BLOGS

July 04, 2009 | 11:58 AM
July 04, 2009 | 11:32 AM
July 04, 2009 | 8:16 AM

March 09, 2009 | 5:19 PM
March 09, 2009 | 5:16 PM
January 07, 2009 | 12:20 PM

July 01, 2009 | 10:33 PM
June 30, 2009 | 8:42 AM
June 29, 2009 | 9:09 AM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

July 03, 2009 | 10:13 PM
July 02, 2009 | 12:57 PM
July 01, 2009 | 7:02 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
29.04.2008
Do I Hear $200/Barrel?

Jad Mouawad of The New York Times has a very informative story wondering why, as oil prices approach the stratosphere, producers don't just pump out more oil:

A key reason that supply is not rising to meet demand is that producers outside of the OPEC cartel—countries like Russia, Mexico and Norway—have been showing troubling signs of sluggishness. Unlike the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, whose explicit goal is to regulate supply to keep prices up, the other countries are the free traders of the international market, with every incentive to produce flat-out at a time of high prices.

But for a variety of reasons, like sharply higher drilling costs and nationalistic policies that restrict foreign investments, these countries are finding it difficult, if not impossible, to increase output. They seem stuck at about 50 million barrels of oil a day, or 60 percent of the world’s oil supplies, with few prospects for growth. ...

Analysts at Barclays Capital said last week that non-OPEC supplies were “seemingly dead in the water.” Goldman Sachs raised similar concerns last month, saying that growth in non-OPEC supplies “can no longer be taken for granted.”

Normally, OPEC would pick up the slack, but even that's not a given anymore. Saudi Arabia has signalled that it might not be able to boost production as much as people once thought. Especially as long as the violence in Iraq persists, OPEC as a whole will struggle to keep up with global demand, which keeps rising and rising, undeterred by the price spike. No wonder some analysts are predicting oil prices to top $200/barrel by 2012 or earlier, which would mean $7-per-gallon gasoline here in the United States.

P.S. An amusing catch by Andrew Leonard. At what point does the phrase "peak oil" become ubiquitous? Soon?

--Bradford Plumer

Posted: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:29 PM with 3 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

virginiacentrist said:

Let's hope our land planners start seeing this as a signal that new development is better off as infill within 5 miles of the urban core.

April 30, 2008 9:09 AM

sdmcleod said:

Lowell at Raising Kaine says that current prices are a result of supply limits. NPR Market Report last night blamed speculators. President Bush blamed Congress. The fingers are pointing everywhere. Those non OPEC exporters have been milking their wells for cash and not reinvesting. But even if they had, it would just delay the end. All that oil the wingnuts say we have is locked up in formations with serious technical, economic, and environmental issues. ANWAR is a drop in the bucket, but something that Dubya can understand. The low hanging fruit has all been picked. Demand in China and India is growing fast as Lowell pointed out. The speculators went from the dollar to commodities when the FED dropped interest rates. They will be cashing in soon and demand for crude will drop a little so the price of oil will come down some by election day. Everyone will be relieved that the price of gas is off the front page. In 2009 the price of gas will resume its relentless rise and the next President will get the blame.

April 30, 2008 12:22 PM

Environment and Energy said:

Remember when $200-per-barrel oil looked inevitable ? Or, at the very least, a $100-per-barrel plateau

September 16, 2008 5:56 PM